Asses the View That Interpretivist Methods Are the Most Appropiate Methods for Researching Society

In: Social Issues

Submitted By merscp
Words 1381
Pages 6
“Asses the view that interpretivist methods are the most appropiate methods for researching society”

Bryman argued that Interpretive Sociology, also known as Phenomenological approaches, is set out to understand varieties of human behaviour by being able to emphatize with it. In order to do this, interpretive sociologist use interpretivist methods. This essay will asses wheter these methods are the most appropiate ones for researching society, focusing on Ethnographic research, Focus groups and Sampling.

First of all, it is important to understand why do interpretive researchers prefer interpretivist methods, also known as qualitative methods. Qualitative methods are any type of methods that aim to undercover the meaning of social action rather than measuring it. Qualitative research allows to search for the meaning for participants of events, situations and actions. Interpretivist argue that a full understanding of society can only be presented by understanding how individuals build up their patterns of interactions. This type of research usually studies small scale groups in specific situations, which allows the researchers to preserve the individuality of each in their analyses. This provides them with a detailed understanding of the events, actions and meaning. In contrast to positivist research, qualitative researches dont necessarily have an idea of what they are looking for in a research, but instead, start with a particular area of interest and follow the lead, which leaves them much more open for the unexpected and fresh ideas; This is refer to as “grounded theory”. Lastly, interpretivist researchers are interested in the actual dynamics of the situation, the process, rather than patterns that could be generalized.

The first interpretivist method to be analyze is Ethnographic research, also known as Observational research. In order for it to…...

Similar Documents

Examine the View That Theoretical Issues Are the Most Important Factor Influencing Sociologists’ Choice of Research Methods..

...Many sociologists argue that practical factors are the most important factors to affect choice of method. It is important to understand the topic or group being studied. For example, if the topic is sensitive, such as domestic violence, bullying, grades at school etc. For sensitive information, unstructured interviews would be the best research method as the researcher can build up a rapport with the participant, meaning that the participant would be more likely to open up to the researcher. For example, Dobash and Dobash carried out informal interviews on women who had experienced domestic violence. Another practical factor that affects choice of method is the social characteristics of the researcher. For example a 30 year old man from the upper middle class would find it impossible to pass off as a 17 year old female sixth form student from a working class area. This would mean that they wouldn’t be able to use covert participant observation as a research method. In stead, they should use questionnaires for information if they need quantitative data (e.g. roughly how many hours they do homework for) or semi-structured interviews if they wanted qualitative data (e.g. to talk about if they were happy with their subject choice). Some researchers may have a lot of time and money to invest in a study; this is another practical factor which may lead them to choose qualitative methods such as unstructured interviews because they allow participants to talk at length about a...

Words: 968 - Pages: 4

Appropiate Sampling Method

...simply conducted. To conduct research on employee turnover first the company would have to rely on a sampling frame. The sampling frame is the target population regarding what your research is based on. The sampling frame that will be used would be the employees who have left the company voluntarily or employees who have been terminated. The most appropriate sampling method over finding out why employee turnover is so high in a company is by doing an exit interview to the people who have left the company for an unknown reason. In the interview, the interviewer, which would be a human resources manager, would ask a couple of questions to get an honest answer out of the employee who left his or her job. The employee would be asked a series of questions regarding his or her comfort level in the workplace, if management was helpful when needed, if the schedule they had bothered them, or mainly if the working environment was positive to determine the morale of the employees in the company. By asking questions in the interview the company will get to find out what is exactly bothering employees and making them leave their job. Another sampling method that would also work regarding employee turnover would be by sending random questionnaires or surveys to people who have quit their job at the company through mail or by a telephone interview....

Words: 336 - Pages: 2

Methods

...assessed this subject and have been trying to explain a certain problem in this broad topic. I’m trying to give a clear view and provide new insights on the entry mode choice and cultural distance between countries. This paper will provide useful information for managers of global firms who are thinking of or in fact entering a foreign high risk market with a high cultural distance. 1.4 Research design and data collection This will be literature review based thesis. By researching firm and country characteristics and cultural differences and the coherency between these factors I’ll try to fulfil my research objective. To answer my research questions I’ll rely on secondary sources like academic papers and books. The University database also contains research papers which can be used to answer my research question. 1.5 Structure Chapters 2, 3 and 4 will answer research questions 1, 2 and 3. Chapter 5 contains an analysis of how to manage cultural differences that influence the entry mode choice. After these chapters the main question is discussed in chapter 6 followed by conclusions. The final chapter contains future recommendations and the limitations that apply for this thesis. 1.6 Methodology The research is based on preliminary researches. The sources of this research consist of papers published in several journals. The disadvantage of this method of researching is that the research relies on secondary data which are the opinions of other scholars instead of facts......

Words: 3670 - Pages: 15

Examine the Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Both Positivist and Interpretivist Methods of Research (20)

...positivist and interpretivist methods of research (20) Positivism is a theoretical point of view which concentrates on social facts, scientific methods and quantitative data. The research methods that are commonly used by positivists are questionnaires, structured interviews, structured non-participant observation and official statistics. These methods are used as they are objective and reliable. One sociological study that used positivist methods was Durkheim’s Suicide Study. Durkheim used official statistics to study suicide and demonstrate society as a science with its own distinct subject matter. One advantage of using positivist methods of research is that the data is that the data is easy to analyse. Using quantitative data means that there is less information which makes it easier to categorise and therefore makes it easy to create tables and graphs allowing easy analysis and making trends more identifiable. Also with the data being easy to analyse and categorise it also makes it easy for comparisons to make against existing research and data. A second advantage of using positivist methods of research is that the data is high in reliability. Positivists often use questionnaires and structured interviews to test reliability as the questions are controlled and therefore can be repeated. Research is considered reliable if other researchers can find similar results asking the same questions and showing consistency within their research. Also positivist methods of......

Words: 821 - Pages: 4

Assess the View That Positivist Methods Are Inappropriate for Investigating Society.

...Assess the view that Positivist methods are inappropriate for investigating society. There are two types of sociologists Positivists and Interpretivists. Positivists assume sociological explanations should be like those of natural sciences and sociologists should use logic, methods and procedures of natural science. They also use structural approaches in their work like how society controls individual behaviour. On the other hand Interpretivism was developed from the work of Weber, Dewey, Cooley, Thomas and Mead. Weber’s ‘Verstehen’ (empathetic understanding of human behaviour) sociology emphasised the meaning of social action as understood by the social actors involved. Mead (1934) emphasised the concept of self in understanding social action. Interpretivists tend to prefer analysing individuals and groups that play an active role in creating society. Therefore necessary to understand their individual meanings and motivations, involving a micro or small scale approach. Whereas Positivists think that society acts as a constraint on individuals and is therefore necessary to examine these social structural constraints, involving a macro or large scale approach. Positivist’s methods could be inappropriate for investigating society because they are associated with structural perspectives. Positivists see society as puppets on a string and say that we are controlled and constrained by social forces. Individuals represent behaviour at the institutional level of society and......

Words: 1115 - Pages: 5

Key Differences Between the Most Popular Methods, the Npv Method and Irr Method

...Key differences between the most popular methods, the NPV Method and IRR Method, include: * NPV is calculated in terms of currency while IRR is expressed in terms of the percentage return a firm expects the capital project to return; * Academic evidence suggests that the NPV Method is preferred over other methods since it calculates additional wealth and the IRR Method does not; * The IRR Method cannot be used to evaluate projects where there are changing cash flows (e.g., an initial outflow followed by in-flows and a later out-flow, such as may be required in the case of land reclamation by a mining firm); * However, the IRR Method does have one significant advantage – managers tend to better understand the concept of returns stated in percentages and find it easy to compare to the required cost of capital; and, finally, * While both the NPV Method and the IRR Method are both discounted cash flow models and can even reach similar conclusions about a single project, the use of the IRR Method can lead to the belief that a smaller project with a shorter life and earlier cash inflows is preferable to a larger project that will generate more cash. * Applying NPV using different discount rates will result in different recommendations. The IRR method always gives the same recommendation. (Wilkinson 2013) It makes this adjustment using a "discount rate" that takes into account inflation, the risk of the project and the cost of capital -- either interest paid...

Words: 533 - Pages: 3

Examine the View That Theoretical Issues Are the Most Important Factor Influencing Sociologist’s Choice of Research Methods.

...Examine the view that theoretical issues are the most important factor influencing sociologist’s choice of research methods. Many sociologists argue that theoretical issues are the most important factors to affect choice of method. Theoretical issues refer to what we think society is like and if we can obtain an accurate and truthful picture of it. There are four different concerns regarding theoretical issues which influence sociologist’s choice of research methods. Validity is a method that gives a true or genuine picture of what something is really like, which helps the researcher easily find out the truth. Sociologists argue that the use of qualitative methods such as Participant Observation gives a more valid, truthful account as it provides us with a deeper insight through firsthand experience. The next issue that influences sociologist’s choice is reliability which comes from Latin, replica meaning an exact copy of something. This results in the method being able to be repeated and creates a less bias and more accurate research again and again. Quantitative methods such as written questionnaires can be used as they are more reliable results than qualitative methods such as unstructured interviews. Another theoretical issue is representativeness which refers to how much of the characteristics you are looking for is represented by the people being studied. For example if a sociologist is researching single parent homes, you will not interview nuclear families,......

Words: 834 - Pages: 4

Research Methods

...AS RESEARCH METHODS (UNIT 3) REVISION NOTES A. QUALITATIVE PRIMARY SOURCES (Used by Interpretivists) CASE STUDIES |Advantages |Disadvantages | |Enables you to arrive at a comprehensive understanding of a group under |Not possible to generalize on the basis of its findings. Solutions = carry | |study (Ken Pryce = single West Indian Community in Bristol. Blackman |out a number of case studies of the same type of phenomenon (Zuboff ’88 = | |(’97) = detailed study of homeless in Brighton.) |case studies of 8 organizations to discover the impact of I.T.) | |Generate new hypothesis which can be tested against other data or in | | |later studies (P. Willis = produced a no. of hypothesis about the | | |relationship between education & capitalist societies.) | | LIFE HISTORIES |Advantages |Disadvantages | |Allows the researcher to see the world from the social actor’s point of |Questions raised about the......

Words: 1209 - Pages: 5

Assess the View That Interpretivist Methods Are the Most Appropriate Methods for Researching Society

...with it. In order to do this, interpretive sociologist use interpretivist methods. In this essay I am going to assess the view that Interpretivists methods are the most appropriate method for researching society by using Interpretivists and positivists debate, ideas such as individual behaviour is influenced by interactions in society, their methods which include personal documents, unstructured interviews and participant observation that creates qualitative data and their belief in verstehen which is to understand what goes on in the lives of people from their particular perspective so that there is a better understanding of how things work in society in a bigger picture. Positivists argue that sociology should use the methods of the natural sciences. They also believe that sociologists should use quantitative methods and aim to identify and measure social structures. They use methods such as questionnaires and surveys, structures interviews, structured non participant observations, secondary data such as official statistics. Interpretivists however argue the opposite. They argue that human beings think and reflect, scientific methods are inappropriate for the study of society. Unlike objects in nature, human beings can change their behaviour if they know they are being observed. So Interpretivists argue that if we want to understand social actions we must look at the interactions between individuals. They use methods such as unstructured interviews, participant......

Words: 1227 - Pages: 5

Research Methods

... |1. Informed consent |• Positivists – experiments are good because of| | |in an artificial environment. |work with science. Society is an open system |2. Harm to subjects - everything, including |their reliability. This is because | | |• There must be two groups , an experimental |where the factors cannot be controlled. |risks, must be explained but what if you are |they can control the variables, produces | | |and control group. |2. Individuals are complex – it |Milgram? |quantitative data and is detached. However, it | | |• We can discover cause and effect |is hard to ‘match’ the members of the control | |can’t be representative. | | |relationships this way. |and experimental group. | |• Interpretivists – experiments are bad because| | |• They are rarely used in sociology. |3. Studying the past – Cannot | ...

Words: 3418 - Pages: 14

Asses the Marxist Views on Society

...Assess the Marxist views of society (33 marks) When looking at the Marxists views of society there are three main theorists to look at, Marx, Gramsci and Althusser. All of these theorists focus on how capitalism has been maintained in many societies and how eventually it will be over thrown. Both Gramsci and Althusser’s ideas originate from the works of Karl Marx who, unlike functionalist Emile Durkheim, saw no evolutionary progress of society but a gradual change in which capitalism would increase human misery. Marx suggested that capitalism needed to replaced by ideas such as communism. He looked at historical materialism and suggested that our society is altered by forces of production from the base and the superstructure. He argues that capitalist production forms the economic base and this ultimately shapes our superstructure, like institutions, religion, law and education. However, Althusser criticises this for being too simplistic and suggests a more complex two way causality model. He argues there are three levels; Economic level: comprising all those activities that involve producing something in order to satisfy and need. Political level: comprising all forms of organisation. And the Ideological level: involving the ways that people see themselves and their world. He believes each level can affect each other and impact different choices and beliefs on each level. This approach discourages political action because it is the role of structural forces rather......

Words: 1004 - Pages: 5

Assess the View That Interpretivist Methods Are the Most Appropriate Methods for Researching Society

...Interpretivist sociologists would argue their ideas of methodology are the most appropriate methods for researching society. They believe behaviour is influenced by situations in society, and use qualitative data gathered by unstructured questionnaires, unstructured interviews and participant observation. They believe in verstehen- the process of putting yourself into the participant’s shoes. They prefer validity to reliability; they collect qualitative data that creates statistical evidence. There methods include unstructured interviews, questionnaires, and participant observation. There are many strengths but interpretivist methods also can be criticised other perspectives such as positivism.  They argue that people cannot be studied like inanimate objects, and they look at the deeper means and motives behind people’s actions. They argue that people cannot be studied unless you put yourselves in that persons or actors shoes. Going along with Webers’ theory of verstehen-, this is observing through participant observation. Through verstehen  the researches places themselves into the life of the person they are studying/researching, by doing this they can collect qualitative data and get a deeper meaning and understanding of peoples actions. They are also more likely to get a better understanding of people’s means and motives, and also why things happen and they will get a better understanding of how society influences people’s actions. It is also filled with rich data, and...

Words: 1343 - Pages: 6

Are Positivist Methods the Most Useful for Studying Society

...likely to commit crimes e.g. the working class. But others say the crime statistics are only a small part of all the crimes committed and you cannot base a sociological theory on them because of the dark figure of crime. interactionists think positivist methods are inappropriate for studying society because what sociologists look at is very different from what other scientists study. It is not possible to isolate people in a laboratory and experiment on them. Also there is no single cause of why people act the way they do. Take the example of crime. We might discover that boys raised in lone parent families are more likely to commit crime than others. But we can't say that this is the cause of why they become criminal. There could be lots of other factors which we don't know about. Because they don't think positivist methods are appropriate, interactionists try to develop their own ways of studying society. One of the most popular is participant observation. This is where the sociologist becomes part of the group they want to study like a street gang or football hooligans. The idea is that by being part of the group the sociologist will gain empathy with them. This means they will be able to see things from their point of view and get a better understanding of why they behave the way they do. Interactionists believe validity is more important than reliability. Validity means something is true to life, reliability means it is easy to repeat. Positivists think......

Words: 558 - Pages: 3

Assess the View That Positivist Methods Are Inappropriate for Investigating Society.

...are opposed by interpretivists who say sociology should not attempt to use scientific methods but needs a more subjective approach with a greater concern for understanding the real life experiences of ordinary people. Sociology started in the 19th century at a time when science was being seen as the answer to all the questions posed by people. Because of this Comte and Durkheim believed that sociology should also be as scientific as possible so that it could have the same status as other subjects like physics and chemistry. For that reason Durkheim chose official statistics to study suicide because he saw them as objective facts which could allow him to develop law like statements about human behaviour. Later sociologists argued official statistics are not social facts they are social constructions. What this means is that people have been involved in producing them and so they may not have the validity that positivists often claim. A good example would be crime statistics. Some sociologists think these accurately measure the level of crime and can tell us which groups are more likely to commit crimes e.g. the working class. But others say the crime statistics are only a small part of all the crimes committed and you cannot base a sociological theory on them because of the dark figure of crime. People who would agree with the essay question would be interactionists and other groups. They think positivist methods are inappropriate for studying society because......

Words: 730 - Pages: 3

Assess the View That Interpretivist Methods Are the Most Appropriate Methods for Researching Society. (21 Marks)

...Assess the view that interpretivist methods are the most appropriate methods for researching society. (21 marks) Interpretivist sociologists would argue their ideas of methodology are the most appropriate methods for researching society. They believe behaviour is influenced by situations in society, and use qualitative data gathered by unstructured questionnaires, unstructured interviews and participant observation. They believe in verstehen- the process of putting yourself into the participant’s shoes. They prefer validity to reliability; they collect qualitative data that creates statistical evidence. There methods include unstructured interviews, questionnaires, and participant observation. Interpretivist’s argue that people cannot be studied like inanimate objects, and they look at the deeper means and motives behind people’s actions. They argue that people cannot be studied unless you put yourselves in that persons shoes. Going along with Weber’s theory of verstehen-, this is observing through participant observation. Through verstehen the researcher places themselves into the life of the person they are studying/researching, by doing this they can collect qualitative data and get a deeper meaning and understanding of peoples actions. They are also more likely to get a better understanding of people’s means and motives and they will get a better understanding of how society influences people’s actions. It is also filled with rich data, and allows the researcher to......

Words: 1190 - Pages: 5

Telécharger | Watch now! | What Is Limited Government