Assess the Contribution of Leni Riefenstahl to Her Period of National and/or International History.

In: People

Submitted By lubaba95
Words 645
Pages 3
Leni Riefenstahl was one of the most revolutionary and certainly most controversial filmmakers of the early twentieth century. The lasting influence of her innovative filmmaking techniques on twentieth century cinema is undisputed by scholars throughout history, but the exact nature of her work is surrounded by ongoing controversy. Riefenstahl’s production of the feature films “Triumph of the Will” (Source 3) and “Olympia” (Source 1) have left a lasting imprint on history; these films established Riefenstahl’s influential career as a film director under the years of the Nazi regime. Although these films are attributed by scholars and critics to be Riefenstahl’s greatest achievements they are also considered to be her greatest fault, for the political connotation attached to their purpose. Before World War II, Riefenstahl was praised for her artistic achievements of these films, however the post-war years present a hostile reception to her work, as they have since been decontextualised and criticised for their questionable propagandist content. Riefenstahl’s impact on history has changed greatly overtime, as she is remembered for both her artistic contribution to the social and cultural life of Germany and pioneering of revolutionary cinematography and in contrast, her association with Hitler and the Nazi party.
Since a young age Leni has had a passion for dance and quickly became a star pupil. Riefenstahl gained a reputation on Berlin's dance circuit and she quickly moved into films. She made a series of films for Arnold Fanck, and her fame spread to countries outside of Germany. In 1932, Riefenstahl produced her own work called "The Blue Light" (Source 2) and got a very positive response. The film attracted the attention of Hitler, and is said to have believed that the image Riefenstahl created for herself in "The Blue Light" epitomised the ultimate German woman.…...

Similar Documents

History Final

...That is correct that Stalin ordered the burning of these books in order to erase Jewish culture in the Soviet Union. Although unlike Hitler, Stalin did not target the Jews as a race, he embraced anti-Semitic stereotypes at times, such as in the infamous doctor's plot. See We learn from our text, that "Stalin forced writers and artists to use the techniques of approved 'socialist realism' for artistic and literary expression" (235). Do you think that this is comparable to the Nazi book burnings? I think Stalin, like Mark mentioned, enforced only areas of education which benefited his plans for the government and its people. There was a big change in the way that classes of people were treated; Stalin cared much less about women than the previous leader and he aimed to increase profits through industry for the already wealthy elite and the military (Goff, 2008). During this time he promoted education which would reinforce the values of hard work and discipline, but did very little for the people who worked just as hard as others, the farmers. They were living in poverty. I think that the only difference between Stalin and Hitler here is that Stalin's goals were centered around earning more wealth and making people more productive, though at the expense of certain classes' qualities of life. Hitler sought to "extinguish" an entire race of people, based on superior beliefs of a duty to cleanse the......

Words: 1411 - Pages: 6

History of Leni Riehfenstahl

...that he could control a cabinet with Hitler as Chancellor Background Family Background and Education • Born Helene (Leni) Bertha Amalie Riefenstahl on 22nd August 1902 in Berlin • Mother was a dressmaker • Father owned a successful heating and ventilation company • Family were protected from political, economic and social unrest because of their privileged status  • Leni loved dancing, gymnastics and theater • Father was unsupportive of Leni dancing on stage as it was seen as a job for lower class women • Secretly enrolled in dance and ballet lessons at Grimm - Reiter Dance School in Berlin at age 16 (1918) • Leni was supported by her mother  • Upon hearing the secret Leni's father sent her to Lohmann boarding school in Thale  • After schooling Leni working in her fathers office • With some persuasion from her mother, Leni's father enrolled her with a new dance teacher and sent her to Jutta Klamt school where expressive dance was taught  Early Career as a dancer and film actor  • The inflation crisis affected Leni only because this made her unable to pay for Dance lessons  • Her dance professor allowed her to stay at Lake Constance for free • Solo dance recital at the age of 21 at Munich Tonhalle October 1923 • Second recital at Berlin, Max Reinhardt signed her this led to Leni performing many dances as his theaters • Touring Europe as a solo dance act • Often danced bare foot with scenery...

Words: 2240 - Pages: 9

Leni Riefenstahl

...Leni Riefenstahl Historical Context • Very popular in 1920’s was ‘mountain films’ • Hitler great movie fan and caught attention of Leni in such a film • 1933 – Nazi began consolidating control through propaganda, which was very effective, using the media to present an attractive image of Hitler. • Nazi’s exploited Leni’s talents as a film director – seen in such films as ‘Victory of Faith’, ‘Triumph of the Will’, ‘Day of Freedom’ and ‘Olpympia’ Background • Riefenstahl had a comfortable middle class upbringing • Father Alfred sought to control her life, totally opposed to his daughter’s plan to go on stage • Leni conspired with her mother and took private dance lessons • When her father found out, he threatened for divorce and arranged for Leni to go to boarding school • At age 21 dance career begun – 6 months = 60 performances in Europe • Concluded in Prague when tore knee ligament • Demonstrated her resilience – posting off press cuttings to film director Arnold Fanek, as she set her mind on becoming a movie star • Secured lead in film ‘ The Holy Mountain’ – premiering December 1926 – it was well received Rise to Prominence The Blue Light • 1931 – ‘The Blue light’ was directed and starred in by Leni – meticulously planning the filming of each scene • Premiered March 1932, Leni declared – ‘A courageous women, faithful to her work and to her obsession’ • It won a Silver medal a Venice Biennale Relationship with Hitler • Touring Germany......

Words: 1156 - Pages: 5

Feminist Contributions to International Relations

...| Political Science 2I03 – Global Politics Term Paper | Feminist Contributions to International Relations | Written By: Maryam Burney Professor: Dr. Andrew LuiTA: Meagan Kinsella Tutorial Section: T06 | Introduction Feminist research in the past twenty years has been successful enough to make women in international relations more visible. Feminism within IR has now evolved to an extent where disciplinary boundaries are being challenged and new issues and voices are being arisen. Feminists have productively established how the lives of sex workers, domestic servants, home-based workers and those who undergo grueling labour without pay, are also a part of global politics and the international economy (Hutchings et al., 2008, pg. 159). Feminist theory considers the effects of male dominance and how the socially constructed idea of “gender” affects international relations and its related fields. In essence it is not only simply about women, however, it is about the affiliation of masculinity and femininity as socially constructed groups that shape how we acknowledge and experience the political world. The differences that gender makes to global politics are vital to someone looking through a feminist lens. This also requires an individual to question whether or not it is appropriate to assume the characteristics of females (Ticker, 1997, pg. 616). Feminists within are international relations are troubled with a lot of misconceptions that leads to a negative......

Words: 3019 - Pages: 13

Assess the Contribution of Functionalism to Our Understanding of Families and Households

...Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of families and households. Functionalism is a macro approach to society. It is based on a consensus that society as whole is run by and for the benefit of all its members. Early Functionalists such as Durkheim believed that society is made up of many institutions which work together to function. Regarding families, Functionalists believe that the nuclear family is best for society. Functionalists look at what the functions the family performs and they therefore say that the nuclear family is best for society. For example functionalists believe that traditional domestic roles (for the male to play an instrumental role as the breadwinner and the female to do the dual-burden) are necessary to ensure that children are socialised correctly with both male and female role models. Functionalists believe that the nuclear family is perfect for bringing up a geographically mobile workforce which allows families to move about for work easily, for example Functionalists believe during the industrial revolution nuclear families became more common as it was easier for families to move to an urban area in search of work than if it was for example an extended family. Conflict theories such as Marxism and Feminism challenge the Functionalism and the consensus of society by taking a more critical view. Social historians such as Laslett and Anderson also criticize the functionalist view of a ‘Functional Fit’ in the family. The......

Words: 3354 - Pages: 14

Assess the Contribution of Functionalists to Our Understanding of Families and Households

...Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of families and households. (29 marks) Functionalists believe that society is based on a value consensus into which society socialises its members. This enables them to cooperate harmoniously to meet society’s needs and achieve shared goals. However, other sociologists argue that contemporary society is not harmonious but is ridden with conflicts. Functionalists regard society as a system made up of different sub-systems that depend on each other, such as the family, education, religion, law and the mass media. Family and other sub-systems are often compared to the human body where if one of the body parts doesn’t function properly the others won’t either. Social structures work for you and society as a whole so if one doesn’t work correctly society will break up. Functionalists are interested in the positive functions of the family and how it contributes to a healthy society. Conversely, functionalists don’t look at society negatively or the negative effects family could have on you or society as whole. Also, Marxists see societies institutions as helping to maintain class inequality and capitalism therefore, the functions of the family are purely performed for the benefit of the capital system and do not help society function properly, they don’t work for you and society as a whole, they are only there for the bourgeoisie. Murdock (1949) argued that all families fulfil four vital functions and without this......

Words: 990 - Pages: 4

Assess the Contribution of Marxism

...Sociology essay Intro Assess the contribution of Marxism to our understanding of families and household. Marxism is the political and economic theory formed by Karl Marx and Freidrich Engels. “Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.” – Karl Marx He is trying to say religion is the drug of people. It’s what keeps them alive in these wretched times. The oppressed creatures are the lower classed people forced to work every day just to feed their families. The heartless world are the capitalist, the selfish rich people who have never labored a day in their life. The soulless conditions therefore become the terrible conditions under which the poor have to work in. Marx is trying to show the system of hierarchy in the quote. Religion is the only thing the poor can hold on to, it can’t be taken away from them. Religion is the escape to find hope and salvation in the sense that one day they don’t have to work under the rich people. Marxism is the theoretical debate on understanding of different classes in society, taking as its starting point the necessary economic activities required by everyday people to provide for their material needs. Engels and zaretskys view will be discussed as well as the new rights, functionalists and Marxist feminists. Friedrich Engels Engels (1820-1895) was a German social scientist as well as becoming the joint father of Marxism. He had...

Words: 811 - Pages: 4

Assess the Contribution of Feminist Perspectives to Our Understanding of Society

...Assess the contribution of feminist perspectives to our understanding of society. (33 marks) Feminism is a set of ideologies used to advance the cause of women’s equality and to end the sexist theory and practice of social oppression. It is a structuralist theory which is made up of several versions, but they all argue that society is patriarchal. The types of feminism I will be reviewing are liberal feminism, radical feminism, marxist feminism, and difference feminism. Aside from all agreeing that society is patriarchal, these versions of feminism disagree on two levels; the extent of patriarchy in society and also what needs to be done to create gender equality. Firstly, liberal feminism. Liberal feminists believe all humans should be treated equally; however they believe that women aren’t treated equally to men in society. Liberal feminists suggest that to create greater gender equality laws that are unfavourable to women need to be changed in order to present women with greater opportunities. Oakley distinguishes between sex and gender, referring to sex as the biological differences between males and females such as their reproductive role, whereas she refers to gender as culturally constructed differences between masculine and feminine roles and identities assigned to males and females. Liberal feminists therefore disagree with the functionalist Parsons who believed that males and females perform the roles they are biologically suited to do, contrarily......

Words: 912 - Pages: 4

Assess the Contribution of Functionalism to Our Understanding of Soicety

...Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of society. (33) Functionalism is a consensus theory. It sees society as based on agreement among people about values, goals and rules in society. The job of the family is primary socialization. The family introduces norms and values to children, who carry these on to later years, where they are reinforced by religion and education. These norms and values allow people to move up the social hierarchy. For example, children are taught to conform by the family and education, which allows them to conform to the rules of wider society and become aware of what, is socially acceptable. Education also trains by teaching the skills needed for later life, for example punctuality, and interview skills. Unlike conflict structuralism, functionalists believe that society is based on merit, and those who work the hardest will be the ones to make it to the top, ensuring jobs are filled by those most capable, with the required skills. Those who don't work, will stay at the bottom of the hierarchy, and carry out the more menial, but equally essential jobs. In sociological research, functional prerequisites are the basic needs (food, shelter, clothing, and money) that an individual requires to live above the poverty line. Functional prerequisites may also refer to the factors that allow a society to maintain social order. A key functionalist is Talcott Parsons; he saw society as working like a human body, arguing that......

Words: 551 - Pages: 3

Assess the Contribution of Functionalism to an Understanding of Society.

...Assess the contribution of functionalism to an understanding of society Functionalism is a macro, structural theory. It focuses on the needs of the social system as a whole and how these needs shape all the main features of society. It is a consensus theory being as it sees society as based on a basic consensus or agreement among its members about values, goals and rules. However because of this understanding of the functionalist theory I believe it has a generally weak contribution to the understanding of society. Because it is a macro theory it doesn’t look at the small groups or individuals in society and thus can miss very important factors. Also because it is a consensus theory it doesn’t look at the inequalities that Marxists look at, such as exploitation and the conflict between the bourgeoisie and the proletariats. It can be argued that functionalist only look at the bright side of society and doesn’t focuses on the bigger problems and issues it faces. Functionalists describe society as an organic analogy. Parsons also argues that social order is achieved through the existence of a shared culture or a central value system. He believes that cultures provide a framework that allows individuals to cooperate by laying down rules about how they should behave and what others may expect of them. Social order is only possible if members of society agree on these norms and values. The function of the value consensus is therefore to make social order possible, it does...

Words: 566 - Pages: 3

Assess the Contribution of Functionalist Sociologists to Our Understanding of the Family

...Using material from item 2b and elsewhere, assess the contribution of functionalist sociologists to our understanding of the family Functionalists believe that everyone has a role to play in society in order for it to work effectively. Not only does the family have practical uses like reproduction and primary socialisation, but also things that personally benefit each member of family like economic provision. Each individual has a different belief on the importance of family and how it impacts our lives; however, I think functionalism only covers the basic understanding of family and how we are impacted by our own. One functionalist who has a theory regarding family is George Murdock, who published his research in 1949. Murdock believe there are four functions to a family: sexual, reproductive, economic and educational. The sexual function is for the married parents. In order to stay together and uphold the traditional happy family, they enjoy a healthy sex life to prevent affairs and unhappiness within the marriage. This is important as it ensures the children of the couple are raised by their biological parents. The economic function is the means of the man going off to work in order to provide food and shelter for the rest of the family. Education is the primary socialisation of the children, they will have the expected norms and values of moral people, helping them to fit into society as they grow older. This ‘education’ will also help them learn their place in society...

Words: 833 - Pages: 4

Assess the Importance of the National Party Convention

...Assess the importance of the National Party Convention Meetings held once every 4 years by each party to select it’s presidential and vice-presidential candidates and finalize a party platform. Both major parties and some minor parties, hold them, and they usually last for 4 days in the summer of the election year, and are held in a large city, with the venue being decided by each party's National Committee. The National Party Convention is attended by the delegates (most of whom will have been chosen in the presidential primaries), and much of the national media. This function has also been lost. Not since 1956 has a National Convention actually chosen the vice-presidential candidate; nowadays, the running-mate is chosen by the presidential candidate. Indeed, in recent years, the announcement of the running-mate has been made before, rather than at, the National Convention. In 2008, both Barack Obama (Democrat) and John McCain (Republican) announced their running-mates - Joe Biden (Democrat) and Sarah Palin (Republican) respectively - just before their Conventions convened. It is therefore more accurate to state that the National Convention merely confirms rather than chooses the vice-presidential candidate. National Party Conventions are important because they promote party unity. The Convention is the only time in 4 years that the party actually meets together; at other times, the party exists merely as 50 state parties therefor any wounds......

Words: 400 - Pages: 2

Assess the Contribution of Functionalism Theories. (33 Marks)

...Assess the contribution of Functionalism theories. (33 marks) Functionalism, devised by Durkheim and Parsons, is a structural theory focusing on the needs of the whole social system and how these shape society’s main features, for example social institutions and humans’ behavioural patterns. The theory is a consensus theory in which views society as based on value consensus (agreement) between its inhabitants about their values, goals and rules. Durkheim saw modern industrial society as based on a complex division of labour which promotes differences between groups, weakening social solidarity. He argued that the resultant freedom to the individual must be regulated by society to prevent extreme egoism from destroying all social bonds. Essentially, he saw society as external and independent to individuals, being made up of ‘social facts’ that constrain and shape people’s behaviour to meet society’s functional prerequisites (needs). Durkheim further believed that if any one thing (‘social fact’) exists, it has a function which will help meet society’s needs, the key ones of which are goals (met through political institutions, e.g. parliament), adaptation (meeting members’ material needs, e.g. through the economy), integration (socialising members into the shared values and goals of society, e.g. through education and the media) and latency (maintaining society through reproduction of its members). Functionalists describe society using an organic analogy and compare......

Words: 1186 - Pages: 5

International Economic History

...situation  worldwide.   Before  the  war:    Europe  had  political  and  economic  predominance  in  the  world.    There  was  a  proper  functioning  of  the  international  payment  system.    Freedom  was  given  to  the  movement  of  factors  (labour  and  capital)    And  there  was  limited  intervention  of  the  government  in  the  economic  life.   After  the  war:   |  | The  United  States  became  the  first  world  economic  power.  Important  distortions  appeared  in  production  and  trade.  Workers  and  soldiers’  claims  started.   | |  | Poor   functioning   of   the   international   payment   system   once   the   war   finished   (lots   of   economic  problems  appeared  against  the  Gold  Standard  System)   | |  | Protectionist  policies  increased.  International  movements  of  labour  and  capital  went  down.    And  governments  assumed  an  important  role  in  economic  decision-­‐making  processes.   |   | | | War  financing   There  are  three  ways  to  finance  any  war:   1. Increase  in  taxes   2. Spoil  (botín)  obtained  in  occupied  territories   3. Government  indebtedness  through:    Public  debt  issuing    International  lending  or      Money  issuing   All   countries   used   money   issuing   (increase   in   fiduciary   circulation)   as   the   main   way   to   finance   the   war.......

Words: 7051 - Pages: 29

Assess the Contribution of Marxism to Our Understanding of Society (33marks)

...0 8 Assess the contribution of Marxism to our understanding of society. (33 marks) Marxism is a conflict theory which was developed by Karl Marx. It is a structural approach to society, meaning that it looks at the large-scale societal structure in order to see how society functions and operates. They believe that structure is categorized into two kinds of structure; the infrastructure and the superstructure. The superstructure is the culture, institutions, political power structures, roles, rituals, and norms that influence how we behave in society. The infrastructure means the basic systems and structures that a country or an organization needs in order to work properly. Marxism is useful to our understanding of society as it shows us how society is based on capitalism which caused the division of two opposed classes. Marx believed that in society we have two main classes; the bourgeoisie or the ruling class and the proletariat or the working class. The bourgeoisie are the owners of the means of production (factories e.g.). Marx argues that the bourgeoisie’s ownership of the means of production also gives them ideological and political power that they to exploit the proletariat. The proletariat are the working class in capitalist society. They own no means of production and are wage slaves who are forced to sell their labour power to the bourgeoisie in order for them to survive. The bourgeoisie construct the......

Words: 1320 - Pages: 6

recovery myfile v6 | Marcell - Firasat | 29.05.1816:32 Uhr VA - Ibiza Tech House Dance Sounds 2018 House320 kbit/s 0 / 01.748 Hits VID P2P DDL 0 Kommentare