Corrections Accreditation and Privatization

In: Other Topics

Submitted By randolph39
Words 662
Pages 3
Corrections Accreditation and Privatization
Hope Washington
CJS/230 Introduction to Corrections
June 2, 2013
John Feltgen

An accreditation program has long been recognized as a means of maintaining the highest standards of professionalism. Accreditation is the certification by an independent reviewing authority that an entity has met specific requirements and prescribed standards. Schools, universities, and hospitals are some of the most well- known organizations that are required to maintain accreditation.
Facilities that undertake the challenge of seeking accreditation reap many benefits, especially when they ultimately achieve accreditation. Staff training and development are mandated under the standards and usually far exceed training requirements in place in unaccredited facilities. Preparation for an accreditation audit requires a comprehensive internal review of institutional programs and services, followed by an objective assessment by the ACA auditing team. This process often reveals the need for improvement in some programs and services, while identifying those that work well. Medical services, food service, and "quality of life issues" such as the extent of institutional violence, the fairness disciplinary and grievance procedures, and overall quality of life for staff and offenders are key considerations. The process also helps to identify the need for operational improvements and provides clear criteria for measuring progress. Often, such intensive scrutiny of a correctional facility results in a safer environment for staff and offenders. And as correctional officers work toward compliance with standards that represent the profession's best practices, the staff takes increasing pride in their work and their professionalism. There are other benefits to accreditation that are more easily quantified. For instance, accredited facilities often enjoy…...

Similar Documents

Corrections Accreditation and Privatization Paper

...The corrections accreditation is a organization of confirmation that correctional organizations follow, go by, or even to meet the terms with the national standards set aside and set forth by the group American Correctional Association, and is only attained by assessments, costing, reviews, and trials. If the association wants or needs certification they will have to survey an arrangement of steps. These steps are: Pre accreditation assessment Application status Correspondent status Standards compliance audit Accreditation hearing accredited status, and Reaccreditation. Some of the furthermost as well as recurrent explanations for an accreditation is ensuring there in obedience with the national ideals and to prove to attentive parties that they are functioning at satisfactory expert levels. The procedure is to, set up to correctly impart our corrections constables on what’s acceptable and what is not acceptable. It is as well meant to deliver an anodyne atmosphere. Some welfare of endorsements are comprised of the assessment of a facility’s ability's assets as well as their weaknesses, putting into practice the state-of-the-art guidelines and techniques, assistive in the protection of ludicrous litigations, and a advanced level of operative skill, proficiency optimism as well as morals . Some say privatization in our prisons systems are fundamentally private establishments that have had government agreements to operate and run our prisons, they have been responsible for...

Words: 351 - Pages: 2

Corrections Accreditation and Privatization

...Corrections Accreditation and Privatization Carl Aguilar CJS/230 November 25, 2012 Lester G. Julian Corrections Accreditation and Privatization Correctional accreditation is a program that gives public and private organizations the ability to evaluate their operation against national standards provided by the American Correctional Association. By prisons getting their accreditation through the American Correctional Association will help fix any deficiencies that might arise during the day to day operations, by giving the correction officer and prison officials the proper training that is required to perform his or her job on day to day bases, will reduce conflicts that might arise with the inmates and the prison guards (Foster, 2006). By state and federal prisons obtaining their accreditation and keeping their accreditations prisons can affectively keep their corrections officers up to date on current policies and procedures that are changing all the time. Corrections officers that are properly trained are more inclined to treat inmates in a favorable manner and this will reduce the tension against prison inmates which will result in a lower tension atmosphere in the prison (Foster, 2006). Industry officials can improve correctional professionalization and accreditation by offering continued education and training, on current training, policy, and procedures. With current training corrections officers will be more adept to deal with any situation that may arise in......

Words: 433 - Pages: 2

Corrections Accreditation and Privatization Paper

...Corrections Accreditation and Privatization Paper Serena Valenzuela CJS/230 December 16, 2012 Josephine Kerr Corrections Accreditation and Privatization Paper According to Foster (2006) accreditations allow a company to comply with national values. Correctional officers are certified to comply with accreditation. Leaders can always improve professionalization and accreditation. Privatization is a private owned prison usually by individuals or stock holders. State and federal prisons are slighted affected by privatization and hold contracts with state and federal prisons. “What professionalism is to individuals working in the field, accreditation is to organizations—a movement toward higher standards (Foster, pg 180,2006).” According to Foster (2006) corrections accreditation started in 1978. According to Foster (2006) being a part of accreditation is an ongoing process of evaluations for operations against the national standards, solve deficiencies, and improvement on programs and services. According to Foster (2006) accreditation is to measure a company’s compliance with countrywide accepted values. According to Foster (2006) the ACA provides a process that starts with an application leading to a complete audit and approval or denial. The accreditation is good for three years then another audit will be completed again to make sure the company is staying in compliance with the accreditation. According to Foster (2006) this system is a verification process to......

Words: 676 - Pages: 3

Correction Accreditation

...The corrections accreditation is a organization of confirmation that correctional organizations follow, go by, or even to meet the terms with the national standards set aside and set forth by the group American Correctional Association, and is only attained by assessments, costing, reviews, and trials. If the association wants or needs certification they will have to survey an arrangement of steps. These steps are: Pre accreditation assessment Application status Correspondent status Standards compliance audit Accreditation hearing accredited status, and Reaccreditation. Some of the furthermost as well as recurrent explanations for an accreditation is ensuring there in obedience with the national ideals and to prove to attentive parties that they are functioning at satisfactory expert levels. The procedure is to, set up to correctly impart our corrections constables on what’s acceptable and what is not acceptable. It is as well meant to deliver an anodyne atmosphere. Some welfare of endorsements are comprised of the assessment of a facility’s ability's assets as well as their weaknesses, putting into practice the state-of-the-art guidelines and techniques, assistive in the protection of ludicrous litigations, and a advanced level of operative skill, proficiency optimism as well as morals . Some say privatization in our prisons systems are fundamentally private establishments that have had government agreements to operate and run our prisons, they have been responsible for......

Words: 560 - Pages: 3

Corrections Accreditation and Privatization Paper

...Corrections Accreditation and Privatization Paper Corrections Accreditation and Privatization Paper Accreditation is a process in which is conducted to grant accredited status and to increase accountability for an employment organization. Corrections accreditation is standards to help keep prison procedures, policies, and operations in order. With such standards, corrections officers are better professionally developed. The American Correctional Association (ACA) has a department that specifically targets professional development. “The Professional Development Department consists of four sections: Grants, Contracts, and Cooperative Agreements, Conference Programming, Training and Technical Assistance, and Educational and Training Products” (READING: Chapter 8 in Corrections). Its goal is to change the attitude and mindset of corrections officers from just having a job, to being considered a professional. I believe that industry leaders can plan for a better correctional officer professionalization and accreditation by improving training. I can presume that many times correctional officers are not considered 'real' law enforcement because of the lack of training and also because the funds are not often supplied as readily as they are for and given to the other agencies of law enforcement. Privatization is a rational and contemporary unravelment to the issues of overcrowding and immense costs facing the U.S. prison system. A plethora of states are distinguishing this,......

Words: 384 - Pages: 2

Corrections Accreditation and Privatization

...Corrections accreditation is a system of verification that correctional agencies/facilities comply with national standards promulgated by the American Correctional Association. Accreditation is achieved through a series of reviews, evaluations, audits and hearings (ACA.org, n. d.). According to the American Correctional Association (n. d.) in order for a correctional facility to be eligible for accreditation they must hold convicted adults or juveniles adjudicated delinquent, pretrial or presentenced adults or juveniles, and/or adult or juveniles offenders sentenced to community supervision. It officially began in 1978, and today it is jointly administrated by the American Correctional Association (ACA) and the Commission on Accreditation in Corrections (CAC). The accreditation program offers public and private organizations performing correctional functions the opportunity to evaluate their operations against national standards, to remedy deficiencies, and to upgrade the quality of correctional programs and services (Foster, 2006). Foster (2006) stated “professionalization has to do with gaining professional status for persons working in corrections” (p.176). The professional development of corrections officers is truly affected by the corrections accreditation. They work toward obedience within the standards that represent professional practices. There are millions of people who work in the jail and prisons system for adults and juveniles. Some of those public employees......

Words: 475 - Pages: 2

Privatization

...4.0 GOVERNMENT PRIVATIZATION POLICY; SUCCESS OR FAILURE? The implementation of Government Privatization Policy in Malaysia can be considered as success. This is because, this policy design able to achieved almost all the objective of government privatization policy. Therefore, our opinion about the government privatisation policy is success due to achievement of these objectives. 4.1 Relieve the financial and administrative burden of government The successful privatization should bring gain to the government in term of reduce financial burden of those entities that suffer losses .For example is Malaysia Airlines (MAS). According to Tun Dr Mahathir, MAS should be privatize since ten years ago due to loss of RM 10 billion in term of capital injection and government also did not received dividend during the 5 years to 1985. As we can see now days, there are so many problems facing by MAS. For instance the accident of MH370 and MH17 that make MAS become worse. In order MAS to success they need to reconstruct the management structure from top to bottom to make a better decision making and become more perform. Besides that, the privatization also undertaking and maintain services and infrastructure, for example according to the Privatization Master Plan Policy (PMP), proceeds from sale of government equity in privatize companies has generated RM1.88 billion, while the government is said to have saved more than RM8.2 billion in capital expenditure for infrastructure......

Words: 1136 - Pages: 5

Privatization

...Privatization Trends in Government in the 1990's e University of Submitted to: Prof. Submitted by: D el 6 7 May PRIVATIZATION HAS BECOME INCREASINGLY ATTRACTIVE TO GOVERNMENTS AT ALL LEVELS BOTH IN THE UNITED STATES AND AROUND THE WORLD. PRIVATIZATION, HOWEVER, POSES A DIF~ERENT SET OF PROBLEMS FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATORS. THE GOAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR IS TO RUN HIS/HER AGENCY AS EFFICIENTLY AS ) .' ''I ,J• . 1 , POSSIBLE. BUT IN TIMES OF FISCAL CONSTRAINlj PRIVATIZATION IS SEEN AS A SOLUTION TO BUDGETARY PROBLEMS. AS WITH ALL ISSUES THERE ARE TWO SIDES. PROPONENTS OF PRIVATIZATION FEEL THAT THE PRIVATE SECTOR CAN DELIVER THE SAME SERVICES THAT GOVERNMENT CURRENTLY PROVIDES FOR LESS MONEY, BETTER QUALITY AND WITH MORE VERSATILITY. ON THE OTHER HAND, OPPONENTS FEEL THAT PRIVATIZATION REDUCES THE QUALITY OF SERVICES, LEADS TO THE DESTRUCTION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEE UNIONS AND CORRUPTION AND IN THE PROCESS WEAKENS GOVERNMENT J CONTROL OF THESE SERVICES THAT ARE CONSIDERED ESSENTIAL TO THE PUBLIC. THESE OPPONENTS FEEL THAT IF THE PRIVATE SECTOR COULD HAVE DONE THESE JOBS AT A REASONABLE COST IN THE FIRST PLACE GOVERNMENT WOULD NOT HAVE HAD TO PROVIDE THEM AT ALL. PROPONENTS FEEL IT IS THE FACT THAT GOVERNMENT HAS GOTTEN SO BIG THAT THEY CAN NO LONGER PROVIDE THE SERVICE AT A RATE LOWER THAN THEIR PRIVATE COUNTERPARTS AND THAT HAS GIVEN BIRTH TO A VARIETY OF PRIVATE CONTRACTORS WILLING TO PROVIDE THESE SERVICES AT MORE COMPETITIVE PRICES. GOVERNMENT HAS...

Words: 3092 - Pages: 13

Corrections

...one measures the benefits of reducing criminal activity as only the avoided costs of additional confinement. Since its beginnings in the mid-1980s, prison privatization in the United States has provoked several rounds of congressional hearings and hundreds of articles discussing its philosophical, organizational, economic, and legal implications. At year-end 2001, privately operated facilities held over 6.5 percent of America’s total adult correctional facility population, representing more than 90,000 adult offenders. And in late 1999, privately operated facilities held almost 30 percent of all juveniles in residential placement, representing more than 30,000 juvenile offenders. Following the United States’ example, many other countries introduced private prison in the 1990s, and many more are considering the idea today. Setting off a national debate almost instantly, prison privatization emerged in adult corrections when municipal and state governments—driven primarily by concerns over excessive costs and crowding in public facilities—began in 1985 to contract with private firms to run county jails and state prisons. Congress held hearings on prison privatization the next year, and almost every criminal justice professional association took a stand on the issue. Despite the protests of many, privatization has continued apace since then, with the capacity of private secure adult correctional facilities increasing 856 percent between 1991 and 1998. By the end of......

Words: 2393 - Pages: 10

Correction, Accrediation and Privatition

...Correction, Accreditation, and Privatization CJS/230 Correction, Accreditation, and Privatization Accreditation is seeking comparable work status for organizations, which are seeking employees. The Commission on Accreditation in Corrections developed in 1978. This program offers public as well as private companies that are performing correctional functions a way to evaluate their operations by a national standard, which offers a way to fix deficiencies and shortcomings. It helps by raising the quality of correctional programs and services. This affects the professional development of correctional officers by improving management, giving a defense against lawsuits, an effort to improve the conditions of inmates, more accountability and public credibility for administration and prison staff, a safer and better environment for offenders and correctional workers, and establishing criteria that helps better employees, programs and the physical structure on a regular basis. Privatization as it relates to prisons occurred because of the growth in the prison systems in the last 25 years. Privatization can allow new prisons to open faster, it can achieve economics in the area of costs, it frees up limited resources from the government to use for other priorities, it helps achieve economics in operational costs, provides improvement of services, cuts the cost of operating prisons, offers new......

Words: 395 - Pages: 2

Correction Accreditation

...M__________ HRM September 11, 2011 D_____ Professionalization has to do with gaining professional status for people working in corrections while accreditation seeks comparable status for their employing organizations. When seeking a professional position in the criminal justice field there is some standards that have to be met. The first step is to identify the distinctiveness of the position one will be in quest for. There is not only one person that is accountable for the accreditation development for any department but the importance of a firm foundation for the development should be established through an accreditation manager. These are six important pointers that have been recognized: 1. Merit hiring, which has to do with the qualifications and selection process used to bring new employees into the field 2. Training, which consist of pre-service, in-service, and supervisory and management training for employees at all levels of the organization 3. Advanced technology, which has to do with the equipment resources available to employees 4. Incorruptibility, which requires employees to avoid selling favors to their clients 5. Equal treatment of citizens, which means avoiding discrimination for or against on the basis of personal or cultural biases 6. Close adherence to the law, which means following the......

Words: 703 - Pages: 3

Accreditation

...Accreditation With prison populations on a steady incline, it is imperative that the facilities in which inmates are being placed are of the highest quality. As the rise in population continues to fill the federal and state prisons, facilities within the private sector have become more prevalent. Aside from witnessing the work of private prisons first-hand, the only way to ensure that federal prisons, state prisons, or these for-profit organizations and those employed by them are conducting themselves professionally is through accreditation. Accreditation is not simply an annual or semi-annual visit but an ongoing process to ensure constant and consistent professionalism. Accreditation is a system of verification that correctional agencies comply with national standards dictated by the American Correctional Association. This accreditation is achieved through a series of reviews, audits, hearings, and evaluations (American Correctional Association, 2011). The accreditation gives correctional facilities a guide by which to operate each facility. The goal of each facility is to maintain a safe and effective institution for the inmates as well as the guards and other employees. In order to maintain this accreditation, each employee of the facilities must handle themselves in a professional manner. In order to further this concept, facilities can construct a series of disciplinary actions for guards or employees fond violating any of the policies and procedures put forth by the......

Words: 564 - Pages: 3

Corrections Accreditation and Privatization

...Corrections Accreditation and Privatization Corrections Accreditation and Privatization Correctional facilities, today, operate on standards that would be unheard of in the past. The jails and prison of the past lacked a certain sense of humanity and an ability to show society that the prison was a place of reformation rather than condemnation. The standards for which correctional facilities follow come from the Commission on Accreditation in Corrects (CAC). The CAC developed the standards followed in today’s prisons. Accreditation officially began in 1978, jointly administered by the CAC and the American Correctional Association. What is corrections accreditation? The accreditation program offers public and private organizations performing correctional functions the opportunity to evaluate their operations against national standards, to remedy deficiencies, and to upgrade the quality of correctional programs and services (Foster, 2006). Benefits from the accreditation process are the following: improved management; defense against lawsuits through documentation and the demonstration of a “good faith” effort to improve conditions of confinement; increased accountability and enhanced public credibility for administrative and line staff; a safe and more humane environment for personnel and offenders; and establishment of measurable criteria for upgrading programs, personnel, and physical plant on a continuing basis (Foster, 2006). Professional development in the......

Words: 556 - Pages: 3

Privatization

...Privatization of Telecoms in Asia John Ure and Araya Vivorakij* Privatization viewed as a panacea for the most pressing problems besetting the modernization and development of telecommunications has become, in recent years, a widely accepted part of orthodox thinking. Wellenius, Stern, Nulty and Stern (1989) illustrate the point. ‘How should privatization be defined?’ asks the International Finance Corporation (IFC, 1995). ‘A generous stance would admit any transfer of ownership or control from public to private sector. A more exacting definition would require that the transfer be enough to give the private operators substantive independent power.’ 1 Hence, by privatization is usually meant the transfer of state-owned assets to private sector ownership, management and control typified by the sale of part or all of the shares of a state owned (and operated) telecommunications enterprise (SOTE). We shall argue that the ‘more exacting definition’ is exactly appropriate for the experience of Western economies from which it originates - see below - while it is too narrow, too precise, insufficiently ‘generous’ to capture the less clearly defined lines of demarcation between public and private capital in the context of Asian telecommunications. We shall argue that this is because the delineation between state (political society) and civil society is less well developed in Asia, certainly less well articulated in law, and unevenly developed even within single large Asian countries...

Words: 7547 - Pages: 31

Corrections Accreditation and Privatization Paper

...The Future of Policing CJS/210 Michelle Cleveland In the USA, the criminal justice policy has been guided by the 1967 President’s Commission of the Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice which issued a ground-breaking report “The Challenge of Crimes in a free society”. This report made more than 200 recommendations as part of a comprehensive approach which is toward the prevention and fighting of crime. Some of the recommendations had found their way into the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. The Commission advocated a “systems” approach to the criminal justice. This approach improved coordination among the law enforcement, courts, and correctional agencies. The President’s Commission defined the criminal justice system as the means for the society to enforce the standards of conduct that is necessary to protect individuals and the community. The criminal justice system aims to reduce crime by bringing more offences to justice, and to raise confidence that the system is for the law-abiding citizens. They want to be able to balance the goals of crime control, prevention, and justice. The overarching goal for the criminal justice system plays a big role throughout the society when it comes to protecting our society. “The only thing constant is change” (Heraclitus). With technology on a rise and increasing demographic changes in contemporary......

Words: 1529 - Pages: 7

50 shades of grey | Lip Therapy | daminiangel