Employers Duty of Care

In: Business and Management

Submitted By andreaweston1663
Words 685
Pages 3
1

Assignment #3-Employer’s Duty of Care

Andrea Williams-Weston

Strayer University

LEG500-Business Law, Ethics & Legal Governance

Dr. Boneita Campbell, Professor

May 15, 2011

2

1. Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment.”

“Scope of employment is defined as actions of an employee which further the business of

the employer and are not personal business, which becomes the test as to whether an employer is

liable for damages due to such actions under the doctrine of respondent superior (make the

master answer),” (LAW.COM, 2011). In this video, Jake is the service manager of the Rally

Management Team. The company currently is advertising a special for free oil change. Jake is

providing his customers with a basic inspection as well as the free oil change. Herman

(employer) does not require Jake (employee) to do these inspections; however, Jake is a certified

mechanic and must provide a duty of loyalty and care to his customers and to the business. In

addition, once Jake has inspected these cars, he may find issues that may bring revenue to the

business.

2. Explain whether or not Herman is responsible for Jake’s injury.

Yes, Herman is responsible for Jake’s injury. “With the adoption of the Occupational Safety

and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act) the United States began to address the need to prevent, or

minimize workplace accidents and health hazards. The OSH Act created a general duty on the

part of every covered employer to maintain a work environment free from “recognized hazards

causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees,” (Halbert, T. & Ingulli,…...

Similar Documents

Employer’s Duty of Care

...ordinary course of doing his or her job (Fleischer, 2004). Although the term “scope of employment” may have a broad definition, a reasonable third party would conclude that a service manger/auto mechanic would also check brakes, tires, etc., during a routine oil change. Therefore, performing these duties would fall within the ordinary course of doing his job, thus Jake’s actions are in scope of his employment. However, if Jake was at work, but not acting within the scope of his employment, his employer may be exempt from tort liability, and Jake would be unable to receive worker's compensation benefits if he is injured. Acting outside the scope of the job can include actions such as knowingly violating corporate policy. At other times, it can be less clear whether a person is acting within the scope of employment, and a judge or jury will be called upon to make the determination (Cushway, 2002). Explain whether or not Herman is responsible for Jake’s injury. Yes, Herman is responsible for Jake’s injury. An employer has a common law, duty to take reasonable care for the health and safety of his workforce. In addition to their common law duty of care, employers have a statutory duty, under section 2 of the Health & Safety at Work, etc Act 1974 (HASAWA), to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of their employees (Chandler, 2001). One could argue that the excess business created by the newly introduced free oil......

Words: 904 - Pages: 4

Duty of Care

...RE: Determination of Whether the Bridge School Owed Al-Fulani, its student, a Duty of Care I. Introduction Kahlil Al-Fulani (“Al-Fulani”) is a 20-year-old Lebanese-American student who currently attends the Bridge School. On September 21, 2001 Lou Gaines (“Gaines”), a fellow student, assaulted Al-Fulani in an unsupervised school lounge. This memorandum addresses whether the Bridge School owed a duty of care to prevent Gaines’s assault on Al-Fulani. A court will likely conclude that the Bridge School owed a duty of care to Al-Fulani because of its special relationship with him and because the harm was foreseeable. II. Question Presented Whether the Bridge School owed Al-Fulani a duty of care given the school’s supervisory responsibility over student conduct and surroundings, knowledge of Gaines’s targeted harassment of Al-Fulani and recent wave of national violence towards Arab-American students after the World Trade Center attack, and Al-Fulani’s age? III. Brief Answer A court will likely conclude that the Bridge School owed Al-Fulani a duty of care. The law imposes a duty of care on schools when (1) a special relationship exists between the school and student and (2) the harm is foreseeable. Leger v. Stockton Unified Sch. Dist., 202 Cal. App. 3d 1448, 1453-54 (1988). A special relationship between a school and student is created when a school assumes the responsibility to supervise the conduct and control the environment of students, who do not do......

Words: 2231 - Pages: 9

Common Law Duty of Care and Liability for Employers Psychiatric Illness

...law. To this end, the common law duty of care is a provision that was designed to hold employers liable for psychiatric related illness that employees suffer and more specifically illness arising because employees are made to work under stressful conditions. This paper is aimed to critically evaluate the common law duty of care and its effectiveness with respect to psychiatric related illness as a result of working under stressful condition. The establishment of the common law of duty towards workers has enhanced employers to provide good working conditions to lower psychiatric related illness due to workers stress. The claims in the psychiatric injury bin the work place context have not been restricted to involvement of the plaintiff being injured or witnessed the death injury of another. These claims include to circumstances such as less traumatic but still damaging and stressor that arise in the workplace like bullying and work stress (Butler, 2006). The work place stress is perceived as problematic due to issues regarding compensation or whether the type of work is voluntary undertaken with all employees compensated equally to type of work that are deemed normal and greater amount to those t hat are deemed to be excessively harmful. The position of the different type of psychiatric injuries has been stated by the court which includes the primary and secondary victims (Butler, 2006). The courts view in relation to the common law duty of care, claims that psychiatric......

Words: 1219 - Pages: 5

Duty of Care

...Employer’s Care of Duty Dwen Guydon Strayer University LEG500: Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance Prof. Phylanice Nash, J.D. August 4, 2011 1. Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment.” According to the definition given by USLegal.com, scope of employment refers to a person actively involved in an employment task at a particular time, usually an issue when an accident occurs, which is required to make a claim for work-related injury under state Worker's Compensation Acts (Scope of employment law & legal definitions, n.d., para.1). Workers’ Compensation reported by Terry Halbert and Elaine Ingulli, (2010) is a program which employers are required to make payments to employees who are injured during the course of their employment, regardless of negligence or fault (pp. 376). For example, based on the video, Jake, the service manager for Rally Motors, cuts his thumb while performing a complete car inspection for the customers. Although Jake was told to only perform the free oil changes by his boss, he owes a duty of care to the customers because he is a certified mechanic. He must complete the oil change and check the basic systems, such as the brakes, tires, and transmission, according to the Automotive Service Excellence (ASE) standards. As a certified mechanic, he must make sure each car is thoroughly inspected and nothing is wrong before leaving the shop. Jake’s and the company’s reputation depend upon how well he performs......

Words: 971 - Pages: 4

Emplyer Duty of Care

...EMPLOYER'S DUTY OF CARE KATHRYN J. STAPLES DR. BONEITA CAMPBELL LAW, ETHICS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 7 AUGUST 2011 EMPLOYER'S DUTY OF CARE In the video, the employer's duty of care is called into question. But to analyze the video, employer's duty of care must first be defined. "An employer has a duty to ensure, as far as reasonably practicable, that workers and others are not exposed to risks to health or safety arising from the conduct of the employer's business. An employer must carry out the general statutory duty of care by proceeding, in a systematic way, to: identify hazards; identify, and assess the seriousness of, risks resulting from the hazards; and determine appropriate risk management measures." (Legislation, 2008) With this is mind, does Herman have an employer’s duty of care in regards to Jake's injury and his overtime? Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment.” Jake's actions are within his scope of employment. Jake was hired and promoted as a certified automobile mechanic and even though Herman directs him to just change the oil, Jake owes it to his certifications to do the best possible job since he has standards to comply with based on certification requirements. These standards includes checking the brakes, tires and transmission. He is doing a thorough job and making sure the vehicle is safe to drive. By being so thorough, Jake is meeting the expectation of standards from a certified automobile......

Words: 1201 - Pages: 5

Employers Duty of Care

...LEG 500: Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance | Assignment 3-Employers Duty of Care | 8/14/2011 | 1. Explain whether Jake’s actions are “in or out of his scope of employment.” The definition of “Scope of Employment” according to Oklahoma States Risk Management and Environmental Health and Safety is, “Scope of employment: means performance by an employee acting in good faith within the duties of his office of employment or of tasks lawfully assigned by a competent authority including the operation or use of an agency vehicle or equipment with actual or implied consent of the supervisor of the employee, but shall not include corruption or fraud.” Whether Jake is acting in or out of his scope of employment depends on Jakes job description. Jake has recently been promoted to Service Manager and receives salary pay, Jake stated that he still does the same job, even with a new job title and salary pay. The question that one would need to ask is, what is Jake supposed to be doing? Should he be working on cars or supervising his employees? If Jake is not to work on cars he is acting out of the scope of his employment and vice versa. Herman didn’t mind Jake doing the oil changes; Jake was given permission to change oil for the customers, therefore when Jake cut his thumb he was acting in the scope of his employment. Jake was acting in good faith when he decided to go the extra mile to make sure the customer’s cars were thoroughly checked. 2. Explain whether......

Words: 669 - Pages: 3

Duty of Care

...Employer's Duty of Care and Issues of Compensation August 9, 2010 Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance LEG-500 Abstract For the purposes of this assignment we independently viewed a video entitled “Employer's Duty of Care and Issues of Compensation.” In the video, the car dealership is running a special promotion offering free oil changes in order to get existing customers back into the showroom. An employee notices a backlog of customers waiting in line for their oil changes and notifies the owner of the dealership, Herman. Herman calls his newly promoted service manage, Jake, to explain the backlog. Jake emerges from the service bay holding his bloody thumb in a rag. He explains as certified auto mechanic, he is doing a thorough job on each car en though he is working overtime without overtime pay. The manager tells him to do a quick, “lousy” job of the oil changes just to get them done. He doesn't care about Jake's mechanics standards. Jake retaliates by complaining he's hurt his thumb due to his long hours and threatens a worker’s compensation claim if he isn't compensated fairly for his work. The video give rise to a number of ethical questions. The purpose of this paper is to address these questions as detailed in the assignment using readings on employee and consumer privacy law, as well as business ethics and corporate policy. Answers to Assignment #3 Questions The questions (in bold type face) follow as detailed in our assignment. 1. ......

Words: 3068 - Pages: 13

Duty of Care

...Abstract This case discusses the situation of the lawsuit filed by a shareholder of car manufacturer against Roger claiming that he violated his duty as a director by convincing the board to launch a Sports Utility Vehicle. Roger should not be responsible legally because the project was not successful. As the director of the car manufacturing company, Roger was quite positive on the prosperous launch of the sports utility vehicle. Areas and Principles of Law Analysis of the principles of law and key facts determine that the responsibility of a director is to act in the best interests of the shareholders of the company. Some of his responsibilities include increase growth, increasing economic worth, and increasing returns to the shareholders; while ensuring that the company is operating ethically by obeying laws, regulations and accounting procedures. Key Facts This case discusses the situation of the lawsuit filed by a shareholder of car manufacturer against Roger claiming that he violated his duty as a director by convincing the board to launch a Sports Utility Vehicle. Roger, as the director of the car manufacturing company, was quite positive on the successful launch of the sports utility vehicle. Roger tried to persuade the board because he researched and found that there was an increase in demand of sports utility vehicles. Also he found that most of the competitor companies have been successful with their launches. Roger realized that he wanted his company to...

Words: 485 - Pages: 2

Duty of Care

...Donoghue v Stevenson (duty of care) The first element in a claimant’s case negligence is whether the defendant owed him a duty to take reasonable care. Duty of care therefore, exists as a control devise in order to determine who can bring an action for negligence and in what circumstances. When a person suffers loss as a result of negligent conduct, they will want to shift that loss on to the person who caused it though negligence action. When a negligence action is brought to court, the judge will usually be able to rely on precedent to determine whether a duty of exists. But what if there is no precedent? What test should the judge use to determine whether a duty of care exists? Negligence liability has existed in one form or another for centuries, but until the 19th century there was no concept of duty as we now know it. Liability existed within defined relationships such as doctor-patient or employer-employees. Where a case fell outside a recognised relationship, there was no test for determining whether liability existed or not until the most famous case in legal history Donoghue v Stevenson in 1932. In Donoghue, the claimant suffered illness as a result of consuming a ginger beer bought by her friend. She could not sue the retailer nor the manufacturer as she had no contract with both of them. On the facts the café owner would have been liable to the friend for breach of contract in selling him a defective product, if the friend had suffered damage. However the......

Words: 1080 - Pages: 5

Duty of Care

...DUTY OF CARE The tort of negligence owes its origins to the tale of a decomposing snail that was found in a ginger-beer bottle – Donoghue v Stevenson (1932). The claimant, Mary Donoghue, went with a friend to a café, where her friend bought her a bottle of ginger beer. Donoghue opened it and poured some of the contents into a glass. When she finished this glass, she then poured the remainder of the bottle into the glass. At this point, the remains of the snail floated to the surface. This caused Donoghue to develop gastroenteritis and nervous shock, and she sought compensation from the ginger-beer manufacturer. The case eventually reached the House of Lords, where Lord Atkin decided the case in her favour with his famous Neighbour Principle. In summary, this stated that ‘you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which foreseeably could injure your neighbour’, where neighbours are defined as ‘persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought reasonably to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions’. In this case, the ginger-beer manufacturer should reasonably have had the claimant in mind when manufacturing and bottling the ginger beer. This test clearly established that in order for a duty of care to be owed, there must be reasonable foresight of harm to persons who it is reasonable to foresee may be harmed by one’s actions or omissions. Such ‘duty’ examples would obviously......

Words: 3479 - Pages: 14

Duty of Care

...The topic that the writer will discuss in this paper is employer’s duty of care. The video that is attached to this assignment touched on the topic of employer’s duty of care and issues of compensation. Throughout this assignment the writer will convey to the audience the pros and cons of both men in the video, as well as go into detail on the topic of employer’s duty of care. 1. Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment.” Jake's actions are out of his scope of employment. The reason being is because he is taking his time in completing the free oil changes. Based upon the writer’s observations it seemed as if Jake used the free oil changes as a means to get Herman's attention. Jake felt that he should be paid overtime regardless of the fact that he was a full time salary employee. Jake’s certification would have been jeopardized if he did not do the oil change properly. Jake stated that as a certified mechanic he has a “duty” to provide exceptional service and to ensure that each car is maintenance properly. 2. Explain whether or not Herman is responsible for Jake’s injury. Based upon the writer’s observation it’s safe to say that both parties are responsible for Jake’s injury. The reason the writer feels this is because Herman as a manager came up with the promotion to have free oil changes. Herman placed a high demand on his service team, and by doing so, he also took for granted the impact it would have on his personnel. Jake......

Words: 541 - Pages: 3

Employer’s Duty of Care

...2010 that “The total recordable nonfatal occupational injury and illness incidence rate among private industry employers declined in 2009 to 3.6 cases per 100 workers--its lowest level since 2003” (www.bls.gov). That is great indication that workplaces became much safer. It should be a mutual effort by employees and employers to keep workplace safe and secure. “Duty of care is a legal obligation imposed on an individual requiring that they adhere to a standard of reasonable care while performing any acts that could foreseeably harm others”(en.wikipedia.org).”The duty of care may be imposed by operation of law between individuals with no current direct relationship (familial or contractual or otherwise), but eventually become related in some manner, as defined by common law (meaning case law). Duty of care may be considered a formalization of the social contract, the implicit responsibilities held by individuals towards others within society. It is not a requirement that a duty of care be defined by law, though it will often develop through the jurisprudence of common law”(en.wikipedia.org). 1. Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment.” Scope of employment is defined in dictionary.law.com as an “actions of an employee which further the business of the employer and are not personal business, which becomes the test as to whether an employer is liable for damages due to such actions under the doctrine of respondent superior” and also as “all......

Words: 1247 - Pages: 5

Employers Duty of Care

...ASSIGNMENT #3 – EMPLOYER’S DUTY OF CARE ALICE F. EDDINGTON PROFESSOR RHONDA J. WILLIAMS EVANS LAW, ETHICS, AND GOVERANCE LEG 500 February 11, 2012 Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment.” The relationship between the employer and employees determines the success of a business. The employee should show that he is loyal to his employer. His work ethic should show the integrity and honesty in fulfilling his duties. He should be bound to fulfill the obligations entrusted in him upon being hired. The employee should follow all rules and regulations that have been set forth by the employer. If the employer finds the employee in dereliction of his duties, he may penalize or fire him. On the other hand, the employer is to provide a safe work environment for his employees. He is to inform them of what is expected from them. In doing so, he needs to make sure that his instructions are clearly communicated to the employees. If he fails to communicate effectively, there is a possibility that the employees may make mistakes in their work. During the promotional, Herman has instructed Jake to change the oil. Jake being a certified mechanic, he is not only changing the oil, but he is also checking the brakes, tires, transmission etc. Herman doesn’t seem to thrill about this, he only want him to change the oil. But Jake argues that he is supposed to keep up his standards as a certified mechanic. With the promotion going on, he......

Words: 854 - Pages: 4

Employer Duty of Care

...1. Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment”. The connection between employer and employees establish the success of a business. Employees are expected to have loyalty and obedience to his employer. When the employee signs a contract is willing to be bound and give the employer the best of his work. Most important the employee is supposed to follow all lawful and clearly given command of his employer and any difference or negligence of duty is punishable under law as well. In other words, the employee is bound by rules and regulations at his workplace and it could be liable for a penalty or punishment in case of violation of any kind. The employer is also bound to provide certain workplace conditions to the employees and the employer needs to give clear instructions to his employees to avoid errors. Thus both employee and employer should perform their part of duty in the best interest of the business and attract more customers. In Longmeid v. Holliday, the distinction is recognized between an act of negligence imminently dangerous to the lives of others, and one that is not so. In the former case, the party guilty of the negligence is liable to the party injured, whether there be a contract between them or not; in the latter, the negligent party is liable only to the party with whom he contracted, and on the ground that negligence is a breach of the contract (6 Ex 761, 155 ER 752). Every man who, by his culpable negligence, causes the......

Words: 1799 - Pages: 8

Employers Duty of Care

...Employer’s Duty of Care Anthony Fowler Norfolk State University Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance-LEG 500 September 11, 2012 Professor Robert Moore, J.D. Employer’s Duty of Care Explain whether Jake’s actions are in or out of “his scope of employment”? Scope of employment are the activities of an employee that are in furtherance of the duties that are owed to an employer, where the employer is or could be, the existence of some control wither directly or indirectly, over the activities of the employee. The scope of employee includes all acts reasonably necessary or incident to the performance of work. This includes matters of personal convenience and comfort that will not conflict with specific instructions. ("Scope of Employment," 2011) In the case of whether Jake’s action are in or out of his scope of employment, it appears while performing the oil changes on customer cars that Jake is indeed within the scope of his employment. However, when it comes to Jake checking the brakes, tires, transmissions and other fluids on each customer’s car Herman may argue that Jake is no longer working within his scope of employment. Herman’s argument may be valid as Jake was not instructed nor obligated to check those items of the car, Jake has violated the limits of his employment. On the other hand as a certified mechanic, Jake states in the video he has certain......

Words: 745 - Pages: 3

13 rponses | MatureNL.18.11.13.Beau.Diamo... | Klippers (2018)