Ford Corporation

In: Business and Management

Submitted By laetitiakalombo
Words 296
Pages 2
Ford Motor Company (also known as simply Ford; NYSE: F), is an American multinational automaker headquartered in Dearborn, Michigan, a suburb of Detroit. It was founded by Henry Ford and incorporated on June 16, 1903. The company sells its vehicles under the Ford and Lincoln brands. Ford also owns small stakes in Mazda of Japan and Aston Martin of the United Kingdom. The company is controlled by the Ford family, although they have minority ownership.[2]

Ford introduced methods for large-scale manufacturing of cars and large-scale management of an industrial workforce using elaborately engineered manufacturing sequences typified by moving assembly lines. Henry Ford's methods came to be known around the world as Fordism by 1914. Ford's former UK subsidiaries Jaguar and Land Rover were sold to Tata Motors of India in March 2008. Ford owned the Swedish automaker Volvo from 1999 to 2010.[3] Ford discontinued the Mercury brand after the 2011 model year.

Ford is the second-largest U.S.-based automaker and the fifth-largest in the world based on 2010 vehicle sales.[4] At the end of 2010, Ford was the fifth largest automaker in Europe.[5] Ford is the eighth-ranked overall American-based company in the 2010 Fortune 500 list, based on global revenues in 2009 of $118.3 billion.[6] In 2008, Ford produced 5.532 million automobiles[7] and employed about 213,000 employees at around 90 plants and facilities worldwide. During the automotive crisis, Ford's worldwide unit volume dropped to 4.817 million in 2009. In 2010, Ford earned a net profit of $6.6 billion and reduced its debt from $33.6 billion to $14.5 billion lowering interest payments by $1 billion following its 2009 net profit of $2.7…...

Similar Documents


...Case 10: Ford: Supply Chain Strategy I. Introduction/Background Ford Motor Company is widely regarded as one of America’s premier automotive manufacturers and the second largest industrial corporation in the world, with operations in over 200 countries. Ford was established by Henry Ford in 1903, and is still standing strong today. Although Ford has significant revenues from its financial services, its core business is the design and manufacturing of motor vehicles. Due to overcapacity within the automobile industry, Ford developed a restructuring plan called Ford 2000 that focused on globalizing corporate organizations and taking advantage of economies of scale. Ford 2000 completely re-engineered several of Ford’s key processes including the Ford Production System (FPS) and Order to Delivery (OTD). FPS was created to convert Ford’s supply chain from a push strategy to a pull strategy. To increase supply chain efficiency, Ford aimed at reducing the number of suppliers that had accumulated over the years. Ford accomplished this by developing a closer, long term relationship with fewer suppliers referred to as “Tier 1” suppliers. These suppliers would provide complete vehicle subsystems for Ford. Tier 1 suppliers work closely with several Tier 2 suppliers who provide the components for the Tier 1 subsystems. Another initiative taken by Ford to improve their supply chain was the Ford Retail Network. This helped reduce competition among its dealership in the same......

Words: 924 - Pages: 4


...factors have pushed Ford to search for solutions in order to overcome the costly supply chain challenges that they are facing and may continue to face in the future. Ford’s major difficulty in their present system is: the inefficient control of their large data base and complex network of suppliers, the existence of independent distributors and their inability to communicate and serve their customers directly. Realizing an urgent need to modify their supply chain in order to make it more cost effective and more profitable, and after careful analysis of the whole situation, I have recommended the partial implementation and execution of the virtual integration direct business model that has been used by Dell. Through this model, Ford will use the emerging information technologies and internet as well as new ideas from high tech industries in order to interact and transact with their suppliers and end users. Furthermore, Ford can boost its sales by providing better customer service and by having faster communication between suppliers, manufacturers, and customers in the value chain. This proposed system will have to run concurrently with the existing supply chain so that Ford will cover both market segments at the same time. Since Dell and Ford are two different types of industries, one is in computer manufacturing and the other is in auto industry, it does not seem right for Ford to implement exactly the same "virtual integration model" as Dell. In fact, if Ford implements the......

Words: 2192 - Pages: 9


...Ford Motor Company – Case Study Jason Austin Denine Rood Jeanne Sands Like apple pie and a summer baseball game, Ford Motor Company has come to symbolize America, the land of opportunity. This America is a place where a person with scarcely any means can take little more than an idea and transform it into one of the most successful companies in the world. This is the story of Henry Ford and the Ford Motor Company. Consider the following quote from the Ford Web site. Ford Motor Company entered the business world on June 16, 1903, when Henry Ford and 11 business associates signed the company's articles of incorporation. With $28,000 in cash, the pioneering industrialists gave birth to what was to become one of the world's largest corporations. Few companies are as closely identified with the history and development of industry and society throughout the 20th century as Ford Motor Company. Henry Ford and his business partners where true entrepreneurs. Today, when we think about Ford, we think about innovation. From Henry Ford’s revolutionary idea of the assembly line to the new vehicles that Ford introduces every day, innovation has always been a cornerstone of Ford’s business. One little known fact is that Ford embraced QFD (Quality Function Deployment) , a Japanese quality methodology, into their product design process significantly earlier than most companies in the United States. This embracing of new ideology has led Ford to offer products...

Words: 3911 - Pages: 16


...Case Analysis: Ford Motor Company General environment analysis: The number of global population is increasing every year. Many developing countries have rapidly increasing rate in both population and economy. BRIC, represent developing countries, have huge population and become emerging market. Globalization impel the communication and transition of both culture and economy aspects. It is the landscape of international business. The effects of globalization deepen and intensify the correlation and cooperation between different countries. Globalization also intensifies the convergence of culture and regulation which reduce the cost and timing of doing business cross-border. Multinational corporations are engage in international trade for both efficiency and marker expansion driver. The development of technology facilitates cross-border transportation and reduces the cost. Internal, as an important part of international business, decrease the information cost and timing. WTO, EU, NAFTA, IMF, World Bank regulates and encourages the international trade. After the financial crisis in 2008, economy of developed countries are suffering a difficult time -- GDP decline, no profit in many industry, the unemployment rate increase, stock market was badly stricken. In many advance countries the market is saturate or constricted. Many companies are switching their production form advance areas or counties to undeveloped area or countries. At the same time, many developing......

Words: 2316 - Pages: 10


...Introduction of Ford Company "We are a globally diverse family, with a proud heritage, that's passionately committed to providing outstanding products and services." The mission Statement of Ford reflects the success and the fame that the company has acquired after surviving strongly in the automotive industry all these years. True they are a globally diverse family, as they have their manufacturing units all over the world. The sales figure of the company holds strong even during the times of economic downfall, all mainly because of the high standards of strategic planning by the marketing team. Ford Motor Company was founded in 1902 and the legend is popular for its exceptional achievements. The most popular of the Car coming out of Ford Motors is the Mustang, to the large scale manufacturing of using moving assembly lines show us how Ford Motors has been setting standards in the fields of innovation and quality. For CEO Mr. Allan Mullaly in a statement given to the contact magazine said that one of his for priorities in the ONE Ford plan is "accelerate development of new products our customers want and value." This does not seem to be a surprise as now in the market lies in the customer's hands where he would want the best of the line of products and for the cheapest price. And in this era where the growth in globalization is sky rocketing it is the sole aim of car manufacturers to grab customers towards their business or they might end up closing their......

Words: 3217 - Pages: 13


...Ford Motor Company entered the business world on June 16, 1903, when Henry Ford and 11 business associates signed the company’s articles of incorporation. With $28,000 in cash, the pioneering industrialists gave birth to what was to become one of the world’s largest corporations. Few companies are as closely identified with the history and development of industry and society throughout the 20th century as Ford Motor Company (Ford Motor Company, 2007). What made Henry Ford the businessperson successful where others had failed or succeeded only on a much smaller scale? It was not just his vehicles, excellent as they were – it was his unique understanding of those vehicles’ potential role in society Before Ford, cars were luxury items, and most of his early competitors continued to view them that way, manufacturing and marketing their vehicles for the rich. Ford’s great stroke of genius was recognizing that with the right techniques, cars could be made more affordable for the public– and that the public would want them (Ford Motor Company, 2007). Ford’s belief in bringing the car to the common man ruled his business decisions. He was fiercely determined to improve manufacturing efficiencies so his company could produce more cars and charge less. Ford was also unique in recognizing that his business was about more than just cars: it was about transportation, mobility, changing lifestyles. He anticipated the ripple effect from mass production to create more jobs that let more......

Words: 464 - Pages: 2


...Case: The Ford Pinto 1.) In my judgment, I feel that the management of Ford Company should be held morally responsible for Mrs. Gray’s death and Richard Grimshaw’s injuries. This is because Ford Company put the Pinto on the market to be sold. In that case, the managers were aware of the risk factors if indeed these cars did sale. Certainly, I do feel the Ford Company as a whole, should be held legally liable for the death of Mrs. Gray and the injuries of Richard Grimshaw. I strongly believe this because in the case it states, “Although the normal preproduction testing and development of an automobile takes about forty-three months, Iacocca managed to bring the Pinto to the production stage in a little over two years”. This simply shows the Pinto was clearly not ready to be on the market. The internal memos even showed that Ford crashed-tested early models of the Pinto before the production. The Pinto was tested over forty times and each test unfortunately results in a ruptured fuel tank. Since the crash tests models did not succeed, I do not understand why the Pinto was placed on the market. The management was unwilling to pay the minimal expense to redesign the vehicles. In that case according to the cost benefit analysis, it is morally wrong of them because they found it out to be cheaper to pay the lawsuits off from the deaths rather than paying for the safety makeover of the cars. The management of Ford was indeed forgetting about the life of a human and worrying......

Words: 919 - Pages: 4


...The biggest influence on the decision to implement the baffle comes from a human element that seems to be missing from Ford’s decision. Human life is priceless, but Ford did manage to place a number on it. The loss of life is enough external pressure to influence the recall of the Pinto and add a part that cost less than a trip to the movies. “One Ford engineer, when asked about the dangerous gas tank said, “Safety isn’t the issue; trunk space is” (De George, 2005, p. 116). The Ford Company did not operate with a concern for the people. Instead of placing the safety of consumers at the top of the list, Lee Iacocca placed profit and competition above all. “As Lee Iacocca was fond of saying, “Safety does not sell” (Newton & Ford, 2008, p. 297). Recalling the cars did not seem to be of any concern and losing money is not an option. The company was not short on resources. They had the information, the materials, and the know-how to produce a safe vehicle. The consumers deserve to have a product that is safe and affordable. Unfortunately, the powers at the top did not take into account what the consumer thinks. The risk/benefit analysis was a large part of the decision to avoid the recall. This would place a dollar amount on human life. It would cost the company more to fix the problem than to save a number of lives. “When someone dies as a result of a dangerous product, unsafe treatment or negligent corporate behavior, we can't measure how much the deceased......

Words: 515 - Pages: 3

Ford Motor Company and the Toyota Motor Corporation

...Running Head: Ford Motor Company and the Toyota Motor Corporation Ford Motor Company and the Toyota Motor Corporation AIU – MGT680 Abstract Two major automakers are Toyota and Ford. This paper will compare the two companies to better understand the contributions to for success of each company. This paper will include a SWOT analysis which identifies strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to these companies. It will also include a plan of action for one weakness to turn them into strengths. It will discuss the current issues being faced by each company and how it affects the global operation because of the importance.   Ford Motor Company and the Toyota Motor Corporation Ford Motor Company was started by Henry Ford in 1903 (Heritage, 2014). Toyota Motor Corporation was started by Kiichiro Toyoda in 1935 (50 Years, 2014). While each firm has been able to develop a relationship between the political and economic forces within their communities, they also understand a strategic plan is important and will guide them to an effective relationship within their communities. This type of plan will help the two firms build brand name as both firms have successfully done. The following table will illustrate the main issues Ford and Toyota are facing. It briefly explains the current position or view of each company to help better understand who the two firms view their community responsibilities. Issues Ford Toyota Legal, Social and Economic......

Words: 2517 - Pages: 11


...As the second-largest automobile company in the world, Ford Motor Company represents a $164 billion multinational business empire (, 2014). Known primarily as a manufacturer of automobiles, Ford also operates Ford Credit, which generates more than $3 billion in income, and owns The Hertz Corporation, the largest automobile rental company in the world. Ford Motor Company (Ford) is a producer of automobiles. The Company together with its subsidiaries is engaged in other businesses, including financing vehicles. The Company operates in two segments: Automotive and Financial Services. Automotive includes Ford North America, Ford South America, Ford Europe, and Ford Asia Pacific Africa region. Financial services include Ford Motor Credit Company and Other Financial Service. The Company manufactures or distributes automobiles across six continents. Its automotive brands include Ford and Lincoln. Competitive Advantage PESTEL analysis framework has six sections: Political, Economic, Sociocultural, Technological, Environmental, and Legal Ford Motor Company has seen its fair share of industry dynamics since its early days. In most recent days the factors that play into each part of the "PESTEL" analysis are not much different from those of the past. However the emphasis that is placed on each one seems to be increasing exponentially. Political Factors: The political environment of the US today seems to be widening more and more with each......

Words: 773 - Pages: 4


...operations united to form Ford Europe, to give a strong regional identification. Over the following two decades Ford Europe performed well and in the 1980’s, its profitability helped sustain losses being sustained in the US market. After this Ford Europe began to struggle from 1992-2000 where losses had accumulated to $2.6 milliard. (Donnelly& Morris, 2003) In 1992, Ford Europe had been "slaughtered" by recent wild currency fluctuations that had torpedoed consumer demand in key markets such as Britain, Spain and Italy. The strength of Germany's mark had made Ford's products, even more expensive in those countries. (New York Times, 1992) Furthermore, by the mid -1990s, the European car market was in a state of virtual saturation with an annual growth rate of only 2 percent. Matters were made worse by heavy competition from both the Japanese imports as well as from vehicles produced in Japanese transplant factories within Europe as they focused on niche and hybrid models. Ford’s own specific difficulties were deep rooted and could be traced back to poor model development, excess capacity, failure in recognizing new market segments and inefficient cost control. As such recovery was slow and it was not until the late 1990s that Ford was again able to reach and surpass the level it had first hit 10 years previously. (Donnelly& Morris, 2003) [pic] 2. FORD 2000 These......

Words: 4674 - Pages: 19


...Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………….12-13 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ford Motor Company is the second largest industrial automotive corporation in the world. Their operations span over 200 countries with more than $144 billion in revenues. Over the years, its market share has been on the decline due to the entrance of foreign-based auto manufacturers. They are also faced with over industry capacity and uses minimal technology in their process. In an effort to face competition, Ford is currently reviewing Dell’s Model of virtual integration to solve their supply chain bottlenecks. However, there were fundamental issues that needed to be addressed: (1) How would the virtual integration affect the operations of Ford in areas of ordering, quality control and distribution? (2) Should Ford completely Dell’s business model or which aspects would work best for Ford? (3) Could Dell’s cycle time and lead times be replicated into Ford’s automotive infrastructure and would the current technology at Ford support this? and (4) Would virtual integration be feasible in the automotive industry given the product characteristics and industry scope? It was found that emerging technologies, globalization of foreign-based auto manufacturers and intense industry competition caused Ford’s issues. Subsequently, there were two ways Ford could handle this: adopting the whole Dell’s business model or adapting aspects of the business model. It was recommended that Ford should adapt aspects of the......

Words: 2226 - Pages: 9

Ethical Treatment of Shareholders and Workers in a Traditional, Capitalist Corporation; the Ford Motor Company and Compare and Contrast the Findings with the Treatment of These Stakeholders in the Mondragon Cooperative Corporation.

...shareholders and workers in a traditional, capitalist corporation; The Ford Motor Company and compare and contrast the findings with the treatment of these stakeholders in the Mondragon Cooperative Corporation. The structure of this essay will be as follows; firstly the fundamental differences between the two contrasting organisations will be examined and how these differences impact the ethical treatment of the relevant stakeholders; secondly, the ethical treatment of shareholders in regards to corporate governance and the executive’s accountability and control will be investigated, and lastly, the ethical treatment of workers within the two contrasting organisations will be scrutinized in relation to the employees right to participation and association, as well as the right to fair wages. To frame the purpose of this essay; to investigate the ethical treatment of shareholders and workers in a traditional, capitalist corporation compared to the treatment of these stakeholders in the Mondragon Cooperative Corporation, it is imperative to firstly examine the contrasting ideologies and points of difference between the two ways of organising. In understanding the fundamental differences between the two contrasting organisations, it is then possible to recognise the ethical dilemmas that arise for both shareholders and workers. The fundamental differences between a traditional capitalist corporation and the Mondragon Cooperative Corporation are the capital-ownership......

Words: 2184 - Pages: 9


...PEROLD On April 14, 2000, Ford Motor Co. announced a shareholder Value Enhancement Plan (VEP) to significantly recapitalize the firm’s ownership structure. Ford had accumulated $23 billion in cash reserves, close to the company’s largest ever cash position and significant relative to Ford’s $57 billion equity market capitalization. Under the VEP, Ford would return as much as $10 billion of this cash to shareholders. In exchange for each share currently held, the plan would give stockholders one new share plus the choice of receiving $20 either in cash or additional new Ford common shares. Ford also announced that it would distribute ownership of its Visteon Corp. parts unit to shareholders. Ford’s share price had performed poorly over the previous year (Exhibit 1), and the proposal drew a positive reaction from analysts who had been urging the company for months to distribute cash to stockholders. Some hailed the VEP as the boldest step yet by Ford Chairman William Clay Ford Jr. and Chief Executive Officer Jacques Nasser to convince investors that they were undervaluing the world’s No. 2 automaker. However, the plan raised a number of questions for investors. Why was Ford proposing this transaction instead of a traditional share repurchase or a cash dividend? How did the interests of the Ford family factor into this decision, and what did the transaction imply about the future involvement of the family in the company? Why was Ford distributing such a......

Words: 9505 - Pages: 39


...Ford Ford Motor Company is a global automotive industry leader based in Dearborn, Michigan, manufactures or distributes automobiles across six continents. With about 164,000 employees and about 70 plants worldwide, the company’s automotive brands include Ford and Lincoln. (North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asian Pacific, and the Middle East) The company provides financial services through Ford Motor Credit Company. Ford is also focused on accelerating the development of new products that customers want and value. From fun-to-drive, fuel-efficient cars all the way to versatile, capable utility vehicles and tough, durable trucks that work harder and last longer, Ford offers a full line of high-quality products with global appeal. The price of a new Ford vehicle is all over the place, with the lowest base model price is about $13,500, the Ford Focus, and the most expensive base model price is about $95,000, Ford GT. Those prices are without any discounts, grants, or taxes. They also do not include any special features; the price is set on the base model. Ford was founded in June 16, 1903 by Henry Ford. Their mission statement is “to deliver great products, create a strong business and make the world a better place.” For has been around for 109 years, they have stuck to their mission statement and they have stuck to their core values, which are as followed; Integrity- “We conduct our business with fairness, honesty and transparency so that we can at all times......

Words: 1399 - Pages: 6

More Posts | Aventura | AU Womens Floral Long Maxi Dress Short Sleeve Evening Party Summer Beach Dress