Kansas City Baseball Case Study

In: Business and Management

Submitted By tianze
Words 305
Pages 2
Kansas City Zephyrs Case Study

Chad Dellworth
Case: Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club: A Baseball Accounting Dispute
ACCT 6350

1. How Should Bill Ahern resolve each of the accounting conflicts between the owners and the players?

After meeting with both the owners and the players, Bill concludes that the three main accounting areas of concern between both parties are:

* 1) Roster depreciation * 2) Player compensation * 3) Owners’ stadium fees

In all of three of these conflicts, I noticed that the players tend to make more assumptions about the owners’ intentions than they do factual statements regarding sound accounting principles. I only mention this because Paul, the players’ lawyer, felt that the owners were being greedy and “hiding” profit in their accounting books rather than split their extra income with the players.

According to our class reading Accounting for Property, Plant, and Equipment and Other Assets, all assets—in this case being the players—have a depreciation value. Unfortunately, PBPA goes against this statement by claiming that the players shouldn’t be depreciated at all; in fact, they went as far as to say that the players add value if anything. Now I don’t exactly claim to be an expert on baseball myself, but I know enough to safely say that baseball players tend to wear down over time. For example, pitchers are known for having shorter careers by throwing out their arm. Therefore playing baseball has to be taxing, not to mention risky. If anything, baseball players should only be viewed as from a depreciation standpoint.

Another dispute that occurs between the players and the owners is the notion that a good portion of the players’ compensation becomes a deferred expenditure rather than showing the whole amount as a current expense. However, our class reading points out that deferred compensation must be…...

Similar Documents

Kansas City Zephrys Baseball Club

...I Kansas City Zephrys Baseball Club, Inc. Case Study This case is used to illustrate some basic accounting issues in a controversial setting. The controversy arose because the baseball team owners and the players association were engaged in collective bargaining negotiations and the outcome of those negotiations depended on the parties’ agreeing on the true profitability of the baseball business. The case describes 3 areas in which the accounting is being disputed: 1. Roster depreciation; 2. Player compensation; 3. Transfer pricing of related party operations (stadium costs); Roster depreciation The owners recognize depreciation of a value placed on the player roster at the time the baseball club was purchased apparently just because tax rules allowed them to do so. Tax rules allow this value to be set arbitrarily at a maximum of 50% of the purchase price (It would be foolish to set it at a lower value for tax purposes). The depreciation is spread linearly over six years and comes to $2m per year. The players do not feel that any roster depreciation should be shown: if anything, they argue, the roster appreciates as the players become more experienced. The economic truth is that player rosters - baseball clubs’ most valuable assets - appreciate and depreciate over time: good scouting, trades, and coaching increase the roster value. In contrast, injuries and retirements decrease it. The roaster should hence not be depreciated. Player compensation Bonus: Spreading...

Words: 734 - Pages: 3

Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club

...Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club, Inc. 2006 Evaluation of the five (5) items of dispute between Professional Baseball Players Association (PBPA) and the Owner-Player Committee (OPC) 1- Roster Depreciation – The OPC is currently depreciating 50% of the purchase price over the period of six years, where the PBPA feels that the depreciation expense should be recognized at the time of the team being sold. So who’s right? I feel that the OPC is right not because they are following industry standard but because over time the player’s performance will decrease and they become more prone to getting injured depreciating the overall team value. Therefore, the PBPA should continue to depreciate the roster as they currently are. 2- Current Roster Salary - The OPC is currently expensing 100% of the players yearly salary including the portion of their salary of which is being spread out over the following 10 years, where the OPC feels that they should only expense the yearly amount of which is being paid out excluding the one that’s being spread out over the next ten years. So who’s right? I feel that the OPC is right since the salary portion that is being spread out in ten years it has actually being earned now and not in the next ten years. It has been deferred for ten years in order to aid in taxes purposes and to secure income in the following years but it has already been earned. 3- Amortization of Signing bonuses – The OPC is currently expensing the player’s...

Words: 536 - Pages: 3

Kansas City Zephyrs Case Study

...Dellworth Case: Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club: A Baseball Accounting Dispute ACCT 6350 1. How Should Bill Ahern resolve each of the accounting conflicts between the owners and the players? After meeting with both the owners and the players, Bill concludes that the three main accounting areas of concern between both parties are: * 1) Roster depreciation * 2) Player compensation * 3) Owners’ stadium fees In all of three of these conflicts, I noticed that the players tend to make more assumptions about the owners’ intentions than they do factual statements regarding sound accounting principles. I only mention this because Paul, the players’ lawyer, felt that the owners were being greedy and “hiding” profit in their accounting books rather than split their extra income with the players. According to our class reading Accounting for Property, Plant, and Equipment and Other Assets, all assets—in this case being the players—have a depreciation value. Unfortunately, PBPA goes against this statement by claiming that the players shouldn’t be depreciated at all; in fact, they went as far as to say that the players add value if anything. Now I don’t exactly claim to be an expert on baseball myself, but I know enough to safely say that baseball players tend to wear down over time. For example, pitchers are known for having shorter careers by throwing out their arm. Therefore playing baseball has to be taxing, not to mention risky. If anything,......

Words: 441 - Pages: 2

Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball

...Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club, Inc. On April 17, 1985, Bill Ahern sat in his office and contemplated a difficult judgment he had to make in the next two days. Two weeks before, Bill had been asked to be an arbitrator in a dispute between the Owner-Player Committee (OPC, the representatives of the owners of the 26 major league baseball teams in collective bargaining negotiations) and the Professional Baseball Players Association (PBPA, the players' union). A Baseball Accounting Dispute The issue Ahern had to resolve was the profitability of the major league baseball teams. The players felt they should share in the teams' profits; the owners maintained, however, that most of the teams were actually losing money each year, and they produced financial statements to support that position. The players, who had examined the owners' statements, countered that the owners were hiding profits through a number of accounting tricks and that the statements did not accurately reflect the economic reality. Ahern's decision on the profitability issue, was important because it would affect the ongoing contract negotiations, particularly in the areas of minimum salaries and team contributions to the players' pension fund. On April 9, Ahern met with the OPC and the representatives of the PBPA. They explained they wanted him to focus on the finances of the Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club, Inc. This club was selected for review because both sides agreed its operations were......

Words: 4323 - Pages: 18

Kansas City Baseball

...Business School 9-187-088 Rev. July 24, 1996 Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club, Inc. On April 17, 1985, Bill Ahern sat in his office and contemplated a difficult judgment he had to make in the next two days. Two weeks before, Bill had been asked to be an arbitrator in a dispute between the Owner-Player Committee (OPC, the representatives of the owners of the 26 major league baseball teams in collective bargaining negotiations) and the Professional Baseball Players Association (PBPA, the players' union). A Baseball Accounting Dispute The issue Ahern had to resolve was the profitability of the major league baseball teams. The players felt they should share in the teams' profits; the owners maintained, however, that most of the teams were actually losing money each year, and they produced financial statements to support that position. The players, who had examined the owners' statements, countered that the owners were hiding profits through a number of accounting tricks and that the statements did not accurately reflect the economic reality. Ahern's decision on the profitability issue, was important because it would affect the ongoing contract negotiations, particularly in the areas of minimum salaries and team contributions to the players' pension fund. On April 9, Ahern met with the OPC and the representatives of the PBPA. They explained they wanted him to focus on the finances of the Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club, Inc. This club was selected for review because...

Words: 4465 - Pages: 18

Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club Case

...KANSAS CITY ZEPHYRS BASEBALL CLUB This case illustrates some basic accounting issues in a controversial setting. There are two parties in the case, which are Owner-Player Committee (OPC) – owners’ representative of the 26 major baseball league teams in collective bargaining negotiations and Professional Baseball Association (PBPA) – the player’s union. As we know, the baseball team owners and the players association were engaged in collective bargaining negotiations, so Bill met with Keith (Zephyrs' Owner) and Paul (player). In my view, I think Paul (the player) is right, and I want to explain in 5 areas as following: Roster Depreciation The owners point out depreciation on the player roster at the time the baseball club was purchased. 50 percent of the purchase price is designated as the value of the player roster at that time. This amount was capitalized and is being amortized over six years. He disagrees that the depreciation is real, because he thinks that most of the players actually improve their skills with experience. The value of player rosters appreciates and depreciates over time. I agree that the roster appreciates as the players become more experienced. Good trades and coaching will increase the roster value, but injuries and retirements will decrease it. Overstated Player Salary Expense 1、Amortization of Signing Bonuses The players think the owners overstate player expense in several ways, so Paul comes up with 3 adjustments. One is...

Words: 677 - Pages: 3

Kansas City Zephrys Baseball Club, Inc. Case Study

...Kansas City Zephrys Baseball Club, Inc. Case Study Issue: The PBPA believes the OPC should share with the baseball players the profits of the major league baseball teams Who is right? & Why? Roster depreciation Regarding roster depreciation, I would agree with the PBPA lawyer, Mr. Hanrahan, that depreciation expense should not be included in the income statement of the team since there are no plans on selling the equipment, only plans of sharing profits with the team players. Besides, experience can definitely add value to the team and increase revenue for the team. The better the players become, the better the games, the better the games, the greater the audience. Who is right? & Why? Overstated player salary expense Spreading players’ bonuses over the length of the player’s contracts would effectively reduce the Salary Expense per year for the team and better distribute salary expense over the player’s contract, but that would effectively defeat the purpose of the bonus. In my opinion, the transaction has to be recorded when it happens. Those bonuses are paid in the signing year of the player to motivate the player to play good. Changing this would be a very controversial issue since many players may want to get their bonus in advanced. Although, I don’t agree with distributing the player’s bonuses over the life of the contract like Mr. Hanrahan proposes, I would definitely agree with him that right thing to do is to report only the Salaries paid to the......

Words: 796 - Pages: 4

Kansas City Zephyr Baseball Case

...KANSAS CITY ZEPHYRS BASEBALL CLUB: A BASEBALL ACCOUNTING DISPUTE     This case is used to illustrate some basic accounting issues in a controversial setting.  The controversy arose because the baseball team owners and the players association were engaged in collective bargaining negotiations and the outcome of those negotiations depended on the parties’ agreeing on the true profitability of the baseball business.   The case describes 3 areas in which the accounting is being disputed: 1.              Roster depreciation; 2.              Player compensation; 3.              Transfer pricing of related party operations (stadium costs);   1.              Roster Depreciation   The owners recognize depreciation of a value placed on the player roster at the time the baseball club was purchased apparently just because tax rules allowed them to do so.  Tax rules allow this value to be set arbitrarily at a maximum of 50% of the purchase price (It would be foolish to set it at a lower value for tax purposes).  The depreciation is spread linearly over six years and comes to $2m per year.  The players do not feel that any roster depreciation should be shown: if anything, they argue, the roster appreciates as the players become more experienced.  The economic truth is that player rosters - baseball clubs’ most valuable assets - appreciate and depreciate over time: good scouting, trades, and coaching increase the roster value.  In contrast, injuries and retirements decrease it. ...

Words: 549 - Pages: 3

Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club

...KANSAS CITY ZEPHYRS BASEBALL CLUB This case has three fundamental issues 1. Roster depreciation; 2. Player compensation; 3. Transfer pricing of related party operations (stadium costs); 1. Roster Depreciation (I side with the Owners) The owners recognize depreciation as of a value placed on the player roster at the time the baseball club was purchased. They do this for two reasons. 1. It lowers the value of the team and second for tax purposes. This is very legal and is normally used unless the company wants to show a higher profit. However, the team’s roster is usually its biggest assets and the only reason the owners are doing this is to show lower profits and pay less taxes 2. Player Compensation (I side with the Owners) Players compensation is a significant part of the teams expenses. The team uses accrual accounting which recognizes revenues to expenses at the time in which the transaction occurs rather than when payment is made. Although players’ compensations are not paid immediately in cash it is very likely the team will pay them. If the team does what the players suggest and deffers compensation expenses it would not show accurate expenses and therefore over value itself. 3. Transferg pricing of related party operations: (I side with the players) This is a common accounting practice. Our company actually does this with payroll. We have a staffing agency that operates our nursing homes. We charge for LPN and RN double what we pay them. This way...

Words: 261 - Pages: 2

Kansas City Case

...Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club, Inc.   Answer and submit these two questions for each item in dispute:  Who's correct and why?  for the Kansas City Zephyrs (6 points). ​ ​In this baseball accounting dispute case I would rule towards the side of the players.  First and foremost, their case on roster depreciation is a good point, because one, this is not done in any other industry when referring to staff or labor, and from a performance standpoint the way you may be able to determine if depreciation is present it could be determined by how much a player is playing in comparison to the previous year(s).  And in most cases if a player is actually “depreciating”, they will be put on waivers or released.  Next, deferred salaries should be accounted for in the fashion as pointed out by the PBPA, because if the owner’s actually do not pay this money in this fiscal year then that money would be assumed to be earning interest or invested.  The third point, referring to stadium operations would definitely need to be analyzed extremely close, because any situation where monies shifting from the right pocket to the left pocket, the rates can not vary from the going rate for these services or properties, because otherwise those transactions might as well be laundering.   Ultimately, the accounting policies and procedures practiced by the owners would lend one to question all of their financial reports because their acts up until this point would cause you to think antitrust issues......

Words: 258 - Pages: 2

Case Analysis 10-3 Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club, Inc.

...can always be sold for huge profits? How should Bill Ahern resolve the accounting conflict between the owners and players? How much did the Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club earn in 1983 and 1984? Facts This case shows that how different accounting methods can lead a company to different positions. That is what Bill Ahern was selected on April 9 to focus on reviewing the finances of the Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club, Inc., which was bought on November 1, 1982 by five shareholders for $24 million, because both the representatives of the owner of the 26 major league baseball teams and the professional players association agreed that Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club’s operations were representative, and the baseball club entity was not owned by another corporation, and it did not own the stadium where they play. So Bill Ahern was reviewing their finances on April 17, 1985. He had to make a difficult judgement in next two days. He spent Tuesday reviewing the history of major league baseball and the relationship between the various entities. On following day, Wednesday, he met with the twi Zephyrs owners’ representatives, and On the following Monday, Bill Ahern met with the representatives from Professional Baseball Players Association and their lawyer. The problem that was needed to be resolved was weather the major baseball league was profitable or not. The players thought that they should share the teams’ profit. Because there was a rumor about the owners were......

Words: 1721 - Pages: 7

Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club, Inc. Case Study

...Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club, Inc. Case Study Antecedents: the Professional Baseball Players Association (PBPA) and the Owner-Player Committee (OPC) were engaged in a collective bargaining dispute where the PBPA believes they should share in the teams' profits. The OPC maintains, however, that the teams were losing money each year. Both sides had independent meetings with an arbitrator to evaluate and recommend a viable decision ”Who is right?” The case illustrate major areas in which both sides disputed the way the financial information is been presented, and the way key accounting concepts had been used taking in consideration the recognition of revenues and the matching concept: 1. - Players salary expenses, current roster salary, amortization of signing bonuses and non-roster guaranteed contract expenses 2. - Roster depreciation expense 3. - Related-party transactions (Stadium operations) 1. - Players salary expenses, current roster salary, amortization of signing bonuses and non-roster guaranteed contract expenses. A significant portion of players’ compensation packages is not paid in cash immediately. PBPA think the salaries due to players who are no longer on the roster should be recognized when the cash is paid out and not when the players leave the roster, GAAP however only allow the deferred compensation to be expensed when earned. Therefore, OPC is right. Some part of players’ signing bonuses as per the PBPA suggestion should be spread over...

Words: 549 - Pages: 3

Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club

...Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club Bill Ahern had to resolve the profitability issues between the owners of the major baseball leagues and the players. The main differences were the following: - Roster depreciation: Per IRS code, 50% of the purchase price ($6M) was designated as the value of the player roaster at that time, and the owners decided to spread it over six years (they did it because they could). Players argue that no depreciation should take place because, they believe that with the experience they acquire with years of playing and practice they gain more skills which makes them more valuable. Who is right? The players, no roaster depreciation Why? Because good players, coaches and trades actually increase the value of a team and injuries and retirement decrease the value - Overstated player salary expense: Owners expense the signing bonuses in the year they are paid and players argue that it should be spread throughout the years they play. Players spread this payment based on the assumption that they won’t get hurt and continue to play in their teams. However, the bonus is paid in full at the beginning. Who is right? The owners Why? Because the bonus is disbursed up front that’s why it should be expensed - Salary expense deferred: Some teams do set aside money for the salary deferment, in that case is appropriate to recognize the entire salary amount as a current expense. However, Zephyrs don’t set money aside, - Who is right? The players Why...

Words: 401 - Pages: 2

Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club, Inc. 2006

...REV: SEPTEMBER 11, 2009 KRISHNA PALEPU Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club, Inc. 2006 On April 17, 2006, Bill Ahern sat in his office and contemplated a difficult judgment he had to make in the next two days. Two weeks before, Bill had been asked to be an arbitrator in a dispute that had surfaced between the Owner-Player Committee (OPC, the representatives of the owners of the 30 major league baseball teams) in collective bargaining negotiations and the Professional Baseball Players Association (PBPA, the players’ union). A Baseball Accounting Dispute The issue Ahern had to resolve was the profitability of the major league baseball teams. The players felt they should share in the teams’ profits; the owners maintained, however, that most of the teams were actually losing money each year, and they produced financial statements to support that position. The players, who had examined the owners’ statements, countered that the owners were hiding profits through a number of accounting tricks and that the statements did not accurately reflect the economic reality. Ahern’s decision on the profitability issue was important because it would affect the ongoing contract negotiations, particularly in the areas of minimum salaries and team contributions to the players’ pension fund. On April 9, Ahern met with the OPC and the representatives of the PBPA. They explained they wanted him to focus on the finances of the Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club, Inc. (a disguised name). This......

Words: 4319 - Pages: 18

Kansas City Case

...Harvard Business School 9-187-088 Rev. July 24, 1996 Research Assistant Joseph P. Mulloy prepared this case under the supervision of Professors Kenneth A. Merchant and Krishna G. Palepu as the basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation. The case is based on publicly available information. Copyright © 1987 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. To order copies, call (617) 495-6117 or write the Publishing Division, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA 02163. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the permission of Harvard Business School. 1 Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club, Inc. On April 17, 1985, Bill Ahern sat in his office and contemplated a difficult judgment he had to make in the next two days. Two weeks before, Bill had been asked to be an arbitrator in a dispute between the Owner-Player Committee (OPC, the representatives of the owners of the 26 major league baseball teams in collective bargaining negotiations) and the Professional Baseball Players Association (PBPA, the players' union). A Baseball Accounting Dispute The issue Ahern had to resolve was the profitability of the major league baseball teams. The players felt they should share in the teams' profits; the owners maintained, however,......

Words: 4332 - Pages: 18

Being Ian | Descargar | お使いのPCは正常です