On What Grounds Have Conservatives Supported Tradition and Continuity?

In: Social Issues

Submitted By hsiq
Words 734
Pages 3
On what grounds have conservatives supported tradition and continuity?
“A state without the means of some change is without the means of conservatism.” This is the idea, quoted from Burke, that conservatism is not opposed to change, only radical reform. Conservatism developed out of the desire to avoid revolutions such as the one in France and was a reaction to the growing pace of political, social and economic change. The term “conservatism” comes from the word “conserve” which was derived from the Latin “conservare”; to keep and guard. A prominent core theme in conservative ideology is that of tradition, continuity and preservation. These underpinning concepts refer to the ideas, practices and institutions that have been inherited from an earlier period. However, as UK conservatism has been based rather heavily on the ideas of Edmund Burke, there is a general willingness to ‘change in order to conserve’ rather than a blind resistance to change itself.
One way in which the majority of conservatives support tradition is through the maintenance of the aforementioned institutions and practices which have been ‘tried and tested’ over a long period of time. This, in a way, almost reflects Darwinism and ‘natural selection’, in the belief that the institutions that have in fact survived thus far have done so because they have been found of value and to function sufficiently. Therefore it is considered that they ought to be preserved for the benefit of the current living society and future generations. Institutions such as schools, communities, religious groups, firms etc. are considered to give shape and meaning to humans, imprinting different values in each one. Institutions are also thought to trap and store knowledge, linking to the accumulated wisdom of past experiences, which is influenced by UK novelist G.K Chesterton. “Tradition means giving votes to the most…...

Similar Documents

Have Conservatives Abandoned Thatcherism

...To What Extent has the Conservative Party Abandoned Thatcherism? Throughout Margaret Thatchers time as Prime Minister (1979-1990), a very aggressive way of governing the country. This style of leadership and the policies associated with it are known as Thatcherism. The main aim of Thatcherism was to create a 'small government' that is one in which the tole of the state is significantly reduced in matters such as public services and the economy, Thatcher desired a free market and a privatised economy. Thatcher was also a firm believer in independence and individualism, this lead to a desire for self-reliant people who provide for their family and are responsible for their own well being. Since this time Conservatism has changed, especially since the appointment of David Cameron MP as their leader and eventually Prime minister. The party has moved away from right wing and is instead now more centred on more liberal policies, This is down to the desire of Cameron for moderation. In this constantly changing society this modernisation is essential for any party that wishes to stay in power. Many policies remain intact from the Thatcher years such as the economy, but many have also changed like foreign policy and socially. Thatcherism demanded a market that was a a free and flexible as possible, a deregulated economy. In 1979 Thatcher shifted the country towards a speculative market economy rather than a manufacturing based economy. An economy in which utilities and......

Words: 331 - Pages: 2

What I Have Learned

...What Have I Learned By Charles Myers When I started this course I was not aware there were so many types of written communication being used in the work place. The field of technical communication is a lot more involved and diverse than what I was aware of. In my past line of work I was not exposed to much in the way of technical writing, I mainly used part drawings and something we called route sheets. These were documents that followed a part through the manufacturing process from start to finish. At the time I was using them I did not think about what went into designing them so they would be easy to read and interpret by all people who came in contact with them. Now I have a greater respect for people that have to design such documents on a daily basis. After taking this course I feel I would be more able to do something like this myself if the need ever comes. The course has also helped me see the need for having a well written resume in order find a better job once I complete my course of study. I have never needed a resume before in the field of work that I was in, but I can see that will probably change when I change careers. The field that I plan to go into will give me a greater chance to use the skills I have learned in this course more so than anything I have done before. I still do not consider myself to be a writer, but I am better prepared with the basics and have the course text that I can use to refer back on when the need arises. I now see that I......

Words: 623 - Pages: 3

On What Grounds Have Liberals Defended Democracy?

...by people". Liberals have defended democracy on the grounds that people must have a way of protecting themselves against the government and its actions. This type of democracy is also referred to as protective democracy. Moreover, democracy opens an ability for people to choose. In a pure democracy, for instance, people would vote on every occasion and policy, hence the core liberal idea of individualism would flourish in its fullest. However, in modern society it is practically impossible to have pure democracy, so we have to resort to participatory democracy. This still support the idea of individualism, as each vote counts towards the end result. Moreover, democracy improves political participation as people know that their voices will be heard. It also encourages political education in order to make the best choice of the candidate, which links with the idea of reason and the core period in liberalism's history of enlightenment. By being rational and self-seeking, individuals will want the best for themselves, hence they will seek to vote for the candidate that suits their needs and beliefs best, In order to do so, they will have to read, debate or learn about them by other means, which will increase the overall intelligence of individuals and therefore help them achieve their full potential, which is what modern liberals believe is the main function of the government. Talking about modern liberalism, they have also defended democracy on the grounds that it promotes......

Words: 375 - Pages: 2

What I Have Learned

...A few Things I have learned in my 18 Years Life tosses a lot of lessons, some are difficult to learn and some are easier, it’s all about how you handle it. Something’s that life wants you to know, are little and stupid and seem life they don’t have any significance to your life. However, it is either going to educate you not to do it again, or it will be a amusing story to tell your friends down the road. The little things make life a little lighter sometimes where as the large things helps you open your eyes and helps you in the long run. Life has taught me numerous things. Everyday I learn something new, adding to that list. One of the very first things that I recall learning, is to not lie on the ground attempting to look underneath the vacuum when mom is in the middle of vacuuming. For some individuals, this lesson is one that does not need to be learned, but for me, it was something I had to learn. Spending hours of crying, as my mother pulled every strand of hair out, and hours of my mom being annoyed yet laughing about it anyways because how bizarre is it, that I got my hair stuck in the vacuum. While facing the pain, I thought I learned that I should steer clear of housework; my mom on the other hand, did not. Something else I have learned is that telling someone that they look ill or worn-out, isn’t going to make him or her feel better. I, of all people should know, this because if someone were to walk up to me and say something like that, my heart would...

Words: 1101 - Pages: 5

To What Extent Has the Roberts Court Witnessed a Revival of Conservative Activism?

...To what extent has the Roberts Court witnessed a revival of conservative activism? Judicial Activism: An approach to the law where the judiciary feel less constrained by precedents and interpret the law with the aim of pursuing social change. Evidence would be if the court overturned past decisions, legislation or executive actions in order to promote conservative or liberal objectives. | In the 1950s the Warren Court were seen to follow a liberal agenda and be judicially active. With a liberal and activist majority on the court the Warren Court expanded civil rights, civil liberties, judicial power, and the federal power in dramatic ways. Warren Court Cases | 1954 Brown vs the Board | Based on 14th Amendment- ended segregation and overturned Plessey vs Fergusson | Baker v. Carr and Reynolds v. Sims 1962-4 | Based on the 14th Amendment- asserted the right of all votes to be of equal value- and lead to reapportionment across the USA. | Gideon v. Wainwright,1963  Miranda v. Arizona, 1966 | Right to legal representation and to be informed of rights. The ‘Miranda warning’ |  Engel v. Vitale 1962 | Outlawed school prayer. Based on First Amendment. | Griswold vs Connecticut | Found a ‘right of privacy ‘in the 14th Amendment | Warren’s successor Warren Burger 1969-1986 appointed by Nixon as a conservative, extended some of Warren’s precedents most famously Roe vs Wade used the precedent set by the Griswold case.  In Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of......

Words: 817 - Pages: 4

On What Grounds Have Conservatives Supported Private Property?

...private individuals, groups of people or the state; it provides a particular significance for conservatives. For traditional conservatives it can be justified on 3 main grounds- it provides security, a stake for people in society and can also be affiliated with an individuals’ personality. Conservatives state that property has a range of both psychological and social advantages. Property has been seen as a source of security in an uncertain and unpredictable world – something to ‘fall back on’. Therefore property, whether this is the ownership of a house or savings in the bank, provides individuals with a source of protection. Conservatives consequently believe that thrift (the caution in the management of money) is a virtue and seeks to encourage private savings and investment in property. Property ownership also promotes a range of important social values. Those who possess their own property are more likely to respect the property of others, which means that they will be law-abiding and support authority. Property hence gives people a ‘stake’ in society; they have an interest, in particular, in maintaining law and order. In this sense property helps promote conservative values, mainly respect for law, authority and maintaining social order. As well as this, property can be regarded as an extension of an individual’s personality. People ‘realise’ themselves, even see themselves, in what they own. Possessions are not merely external objects, valued because they are......

Words: 401 - Pages: 2

How Selective Did Irish Nationalists Have to Be to Establish Continuity with the National Past?

...How selective did Irish nationalists have to be to establish continuity with the national past? PLAN Introduction: what is the national past? What was the aim and beliefs of the Irish nationalists? Discuss Hobsbawm’s, Inventing traditions What was the Gaelic league? How did this effect the continuity of the national past? What was the Easter rising? What was the Irish nationalist’s part in this, and how selective did they have to be to ensure continuity of the Irish past? What do sources suggest? How the Irish past was reinvented? How did people’s perspective of the Irish national past differ through the years? What was remembered selectively and what was easily forgotten to suit a certain set of beliefs at that time? What rules, regulations, rituals, practises were used to ensure continuity of the national past? Conclusion – What have we learned from sources regarding Irish Nationalism and the continuity? Compare evidence, and conclude. I am going to discuss how selective Irish nationalists had to be to establish continuity. Firstly the Irish Nationalists are a broad group who assert the view that the rule of the London government was the damage of Irish tradition. One very important factor is the invention of tradition, throughout this essay I will be discussing ways in which Irish nationalists used this to ensure certain parts of past history were remembered by inaccurate telling’s and how these traditions were passed down throughout generations, I......

Words: 1412 - Pages: 6

To What Extent Do Conservatives Believe in Traditon and Continuity

...To what extent do conservatives believe in tradition and continuity? * Tradition refers to ideas, practices or institutions that have endured over time and been inherited from earlier periods. Its very nature creates continuity between the past, present and future. The very name ‘conservatism’ suggests that followers of the ideology believe in the maintenance of tradition and the preservation of continuity. * There are certainly numerous examples in which it is evident that conservatives believe in tradition and continuity; its very development was based on preserving the pre-Puritan traditions. * Despite it being a fundamental part of the ideology, however, history dictates that conservatives have on numerous occasions abandoned such belief in favour of realistic pragmatism, * Such as Disraeli’s identification of the Two Nations and the Conservative government of 1950, following the establishment of the National Health Service in 1946, chose to maintain this popular institution regardless of conservatives originally favouring the traditional method of private healthcare. * It can even be argued that such pragmatism has created a modern Conservative party that bares little, if no resemblance of, conservative ideology; whereas tradition conservatives stressed on tradition, the New Right and modern conservatism has rejected this notion. * The belief in tradition and continuity was given great importance by traditional conservatives. The original......

Words: 959 - Pages: 4

On What Grounds Have Liberals Supported Democracy?

...Liberals have justified democracy as they believe they must have a means of protecting themselves from the intervention of government. This is sometimes seen as protective democracy, and it, for example, allows tax-payers to protect their property by controlling the composition of the tax-making body – hence the principle of ‘no taxation without representation’. Utilitarians have also linked democracy to the ability of individuals to advance or defend their interests, meaning that political democracy promotes ‘the greatest happiness for the greatest number’. Democracy has also been endorsed on the grounds that political participation has educational advantages. By participating in political life, citizens enhance their understanding, strengthen their sensibilities and achieve a higher level of personal development. This is sometimes called developmental democracy. Mill believed in individuality and fulfilling potential. A more modern liberal defence of democracy draws on pluralist ideas in arguing that democracy is the best means of maintaining equilibrium within complex and fluid modern societies. As democracy gives competing groups a political voice, it binds them to the political system and so maintains political stability. Democracy is rule by the people. Its ‘liberal’ features are reflected in a network of internal and external checks on government in order to protect citizens against the state and guarantee liberty. Therefore, democracy in most of the western......

Words: 460 - Pages: 2

Von What Grounds Have Liberals Defended Constitutionalism

...fvOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended......

Words: 687 - Pages: 3

To What Extent Do Conservatives Believe in Tradition and Continuity

...Tradition is based on practices, ideas and institutions that have passed through time and has been produced from its earliest of origins. Conservatives stress the importance of tradition as it allows continuity between different time frames, traditional conservatives are against change so tradition creates a bases of society staying the same for examples, in terms of being hierarchical. The terms of tradition has caused conflict within conservatism as the New Right – the neoliberals and neoconservatives, have avoided placing any importance of tradition and continuity needed in society thus showing tradition and continuity is less followed by conservatives now. Traditional conservatives support and defend the idea of tradition and continuity on many different grounds. For example, tradition provides a basis of religious faith that is shaped by God who is the creator of the Earth. This therefore means that traditional institutions provide natural law – tradition is seen as having accumulated wisdom from the past, these institutions and practices has been able to be “tested by time” and therefore they should be preserved for the benefit of those living now and for future generations. This means that society is based on a relationship between those who are living, those who are dead and those who are to be born – the dead always has the upper hand over society as they are the “democracy of the dead” – providing a structure for the present society to follow. Tradition and......

Words: 1149 - Pages: 5

How Have Conservatives Justified Property?

...HOW HAVE CONSERVATIVES JUSTIFIED PRIVATE PROPERTY? Conservatives see many positives in private property, the ownership of assets (physical goods and wealth). These include psychological, social and personal reasons. Private property can provide psychological advantages because it provides security. This is because property is seen as ‘something to fall back on’. This idea is particularly prominent for conservatives because they believe that the world is unpredictable and uncertain. Thus, private property gives a sense of confidence and assurance as there is a source of protection that will back individuals up in difficult times. Therefore, conservatives have advocated thrift, cautious management of money, as a virtue in itself and thus encourage private savings schemes and investments Furthermore, private property is seen by conservatives as promoting social values. This is because those who possess property are more likely to respect the property of others due to the fact that they have a ‘stake’ in society and thus have an interest in maintaining law and order. Therefore, they are aware that property must be safeguarded from disorder and lawlessness. As a result, this attitude promotes ‘conservative’ values of respect for law, authority and social order. Neo-liberals have seen things differently, however, by advocating that property reflects merit and thus does not require certain duties and obligations. Those who work hard and possess talent should acquire wealth,...

Words: 380 - Pages: 2

How, and Why, Have Conservatives Objected to Social Equality?

...Traditional conservatives have objected to social equality on the grounds that society is organic and naturally hierarchical. Social equality is therefore undesirable and unachievable, as power, status and property are always unequally distributed. Conservatives agree with liberals in accepting natural inequality among individuals; some are born with talents and skills that are denied to others. Hierarchy is an inevitable feature of an organic society, not merely a consequence of individual differences. Pre-democratic conservatives such as Burke embraced the idea of ‘natural aristocracy’ (the idea that talent and leadership are innate qualities that cannot be acquired through effort or self-advancement). Society is composed of a collection of different groups, bodies and institutions, each with its own role and purpose, just as the body is composed of a collection of different and 'unequal' organs. One Nation conservatives have further argued that the natural inequality of wealth and social position is justified by a corresponding inequality of social responsibilities, as the wealthy and prosperous have a social duty to look after the less well-off- noblesse oblige. Thus conservatives are often associated with the idea of paternalism. Conservatives have also objected to social equality because of the emphasis they put on authority. Unlike the liberals who believe that authority is established by the individuals for their own benefits, conservatives’ belief that......

Words: 383 - Pages: 2

What Is the Conservative View of Pragmatism

...Pragmatism is the belief that behaviour should be shaped in accordance with practical circumstances and goals rather than principles, beliefs or ideological objectives. Traditional conservatives have undoubtedly favoured pragmatism over principle. The basis for this position is the belief that human beings are intellectually limited. The world is simply too complicated for human reason to fully grasp, hence the belief that the political world is ‘boundless and bottomless’. Traditional conservatives are therefore suspicious of abstract ideas and systems of thought that claim to understand what is simply incomprehensible. They prefer to ground their ideas in tradition, experience and history, adopting a cautious, moderate and above all pragmatic approach to the world, and avoiding, if at all possible, doctrinaire or dogmatic beliefs. Principles such as ‘rights of man’, ‘equality’ and ‘social justice’ are fraught with danger because they provide a blueprint for the reform or remodelling of the world, and all such blueprints are unreliable. Pragmatism thus ensures that ‘the cure is not worse than the disease’. This emphasis on pragmatism can be illustrated by the development of the One Nation tradition. As deepening social inequality contains the seeds of revolution, conservatives came to recognise that prudent social reform was the best protection against the danger of popular insurrection. A pragmatic concern to alleviate poverty is therefore in the interests of the rich......

Words: 353 - Pages: 2

How and Why Have Multiculturalists Supported Minority Rights

...How and why have multiculturalists supported minority rights? Minority rights, otherwise referred to as multicultural rights are rights given to minority groups such as ethnic or religious. They are special in two ways; 1. They are established to certain groups. 2. They offer advantages to certain groups. INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM – INDIVIDUAL SELF-RESPECT + CULTURAL MEMBERSHIP: One reason as to why multiculturalists may agree with minority rights is that it advances individual freedom, this is supported by liberal multiculturalist Charles Taylor who saw a link between individual self-respect and culture membership. Therefore, culture is vital for minorities to live an autonomous life and hence minority rights must be safeguarded. PREVENTS OPRESSION – FAILURE OF RECOGNITION + CULTURAL IMPERIALISM: A second reason is the argument that it prevents oppression. It is possible that a state can harm their citizens by ignoring their cultural identity – a process Charles Taylor calls failure of recognition therefore, there must be minority rights to avoid cultural imperialism (domination) by the host country. REDUCES SOCIAL INJUSTICE – AFRICAN AMERICANS SOCIAL DISCRIMIBATION: Lastly, the argument that minority rights reduce social injustice is supported by multiculturalists. Such examples the underrepresentation of cultural groups. This is done through positive discrimination as evident with black Americans in 1978 with the case of University of California v Bakke where......

Words: 261 - Pages: 2

Google Apps The Missing Manual | Thám Tử Lừng Danh Conan chap 416 | The Avengers