Organizational Learning for Organizational Knowledge

In: Business and Management

Submitted By rlcheat
Words 1111
Pages 5
Organizational Learning for Organizational Knowledge
The Full Future for Knowledge Management All organizations have one true goal, and that is to grow and flourish, to be successful in whatever the scope of their business model entails. In order to effectively accomplish this goal all organizations must acquire the ability to transform information into knowledge and learn from that knowledge. Thomas H. Huxley probably stated it best when he said “the greatest end of life is not knowledge but action’ (Lewis, 2008), this holds an inherent thread of truth for almost any organization. Any organization that fails to learn from the knowledge they hold, is most likely doomed to failure as an organization. Organizations all have missions; they state these concisely in their mission statements, briefly outlining their reason for being. This is their focus and ultimate goal and while these goals are normally quite lofty the real question is how they are going to accomplish this goal. All resources are going to be directed to the achievement of this goal, and in reality, probably the most overlooked yet undoubtedly most important resources is found in organizational knowledge. Organizational knowledge can take many forms; it can be books, lessons and training, files on a network or computer, even what an individual employee knows and more. In its most broad sense, it is each and every one of these things, from all sources and employees collectively under the umbrella that is the organization itself. It behooves the organization to take the time in which to foster and continue to build upon this foundation. Each of the examples given here was already built over time and a different basis of information. For employees it could have been education, or even prior employment experience in which they brought with them, each individual situation lending its own…...

Similar Documents

Theory and Practice of Organizational Learning

...Theory and Practice of Organizational Learning Teresa Friskney Strayer University   Theory and Practice of Organizational Learning Organizational learning explores ways to design organizations so that they carry out their function successfully, encourage people to reach their full potential, and, at the same time, help the world to be a better place. Learning organizations are organizations where people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire, where new and expansive patterns of thinking are nurtured, where collective aspiration is set free, and where people are continually learning to see the whole together (Smith, 2001). However, there seems no clear definition of organizational learning except for the fact that it is learning, in one form or another. “Organizational learning is a flexible concept spanning a number of disciplines and perspectives so that it is now impossible to capture with a single definition” (Merriam, Caffarella, & Baumgartner, 2007, p. 43). For the purpose of this paper, the following information concerns only three characteristics of a successful learning organization. Discussion concerns systems thinking, shared vision, and team learning. In order to understand systems thinking, one must define it as a group of interacting, interrelated, and interdependent components that form a complex and unified whole. For example, a system can be a department in an organization. Each system has a purpose in a......

Words: 511 - Pages: 3

Organizational Learning

...Introduction Organizational Learning has become an important theory in the development of leadership and organizational growth. There are many works available on the topic but Peter M. Senge’s book “The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization” is held as the foremost organizational learning concept that others have built upon. In 1990, Senge outlined the five disciplines as follows: 1. System Thinking: is the conceptual framework where organizations see the total picture to make effective change. It is considered the cornerstone of the disciplines. 2. Personal Mastery: is dependent on the commitment of the organization’s members to effect change so the organization may learn. 3. Mental Models: exposes the biases that we carry with us, which we may be unaware of. In order to learn and change it is necessary to “turn the mirror inward.” It opens the member to “learningful” conversations and other’s input. 4. Building Shared Vision: this is the shared commitment of the future goals of the organization. The key component of this discipline is that the vision is shared by the stakeholders and not dictated by the organization. 5. Team Learning: this is the foundation to the organization’s ability to thrive. It is a vital component of modern organizations as the learning unit is the team, as opposed to the individual. The teams must learn so the organization may learn. Senge defined his framework as disciplines because he considered them...

Words: 1828 - Pages: 8

Organizational Learning

... The title of this journal is Organizational Learning Practices in the Project Management Environment. The author is Timothy G. Kotnour from University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA. This journal focuses on understanding how project managers continuously improve their project quality and performance by building knowledge through learning. Beside that, for the project organization to learn, organizational members must create, share and apply knowledge. The organizations members will create new knowledge for learning experiences. Learning-by-doing occurs when a problem solver associates plans and actions to accomplish positive results and avoid negative results (Anzai, 1987). While, the plan-duty-study-act (PDSA) cycle, is used to represent the learning process in a project environment. There have two learning cycle in this journal which is Inter-project learning cycle and Intra-project learning cycle. Inter-project learning is the combining and sharing of lessons learned across projects to apply and develop new knowledge. Tools to support inter-project learning include information technology tools and employee groups aimed at sharing knowledge across the organization provides a detailed example of an online system for recognizing, documenting, validating and making available lessons learned for an organization. While, intra-project learning is the creation and sharing of knowledge within a project. Intra-project learning focuses on tasks within a......

Words: 1580 - Pages: 7

Organizational Learning

...MGT600-1205A-03: Business Research for Decision Making Unit 1 IP Dr. Anthony Matias MGT600-1205A-03 Christine Blewett Abstract This paper will show the differences and similarities between formal research and a business proposal. After looking at different findings, the differences between both concepts exceed the similarities. It will then look at different studies done by many researchers to support the Hypothesis that Organizational Learning is indeed a predictor of effective strategic management. This paper will present how organizational learning can help managers with their strategic thinking to better execute goals and tasks. In the world today, we are surrounded by millions of businesses. We rely on these businesses for many of our essential needs. They provide us with food, clothes, entertainment and so much more. So, when problems occur in a business, it does not only affect the company itself but us as well. It is crucial that businesses run smoothly, and those who are in command know of solutions when certain problems arise to avoid negative outcomes. Those in charge are often called Business Manager’s. Business manager's come across problems on a day to day basis, whether big or small, managers must resolve these problems by making the right decision(Uma Sekaran, 2010, p. 2). Depending on the dilemma, decisions and solutions can be quite difficult to come up with so a process to make this task easier can be extremely helpful to the manager. Also...

Words: 1624 - Pages: 7

Managing Knowledge: the Link Between Culture and Organizational Learning

...Essay: Managing Knowledge: The Link between Culture and Organizational Learning According to the article, I’m totally agree with it, because the main idea is that to be successful in business environment you must Know your company and make your employees know it as well, start knowing the goals, objectives, activities, personal, infrastructure, organization, processes, culture, in general all the things that involves your company, have an entire knowledge about it. Other interesting point is the Stata’s quote that talk about the organization’s ability to learn faster all the aspects about the company than the competitors is an important source of competitive advantage, this is really interesting, because if all people involved into an organization knows exactly what is it about, create new fresh ideas, and communicate them to the other members of the organization in an efficient way, this allows the company to become successful and better than the competitors. I think that every company, has an organizational culture and learning process clearly defined, when an enterprise has an organizational culture that leads the entire company, the personal feels they are committed to the enterprise, and they are satisfied with their performance. About the learning processes I think is vital to the organization that all people involved know exactly what are their functions, and not only their owns, also the manager’s, CEO’s, and Director’s functions, with this, they feel......

Words: 328 - Pages: 2

Organizational Learning

...Learning is the way we create new knowledge and improve ourselves. Brown and Duguid describe organizational learning is the bridge between working and innovating. Organizational Learning is a process to enable organizations to better use the knowledge of their members to make business decisions. In a conventional organization, decisions are often based on management perspective without taking into account the other members of the organization. A business using Organizational Learning recognizes the value added by including all of its members in the decision making process. A Learning Organization recognizes that a business consists of people and it takes a commitment from all in the organization to best obtain the organization’s goals. Through Organizational Learning an organization gains knowledge and develops skills to empower its members to work as a cohesive team. The following table saws some of the key differences between a Conventional Organization and a Learning Organization. Conventional Organization | Learning Organization | Locked into management’s views of methods and goals. | Flexible and open to new ideas. | Makes decisions based on what currently best fits the organizational structure. | 1. Willing to disregard the status quo in favor of innovation. 2. Management encourages all members to continuously rethink what they do, how they do it, and how they might do it better | Adapts and/or reacts to change. | Anticipates the future and strives to create......

Words: 1453 - Pages: 6

Organizational Learning

...Organizational learning Characteristics IS how companies change in order to adapt in their environment. The characteritics of the organizational learning are: 1. It means that never finishes à outgoing process 2. Constant measurement of performance à To see how they are working • Learning curve if there is change, first the performance of the company will decrees and in a certain time will go up. ( when all the people adapt to the new conditions this will change). 3. Experimentationà this ones are implemented in order to adapt people and make changes. • Simulations: Try ti make similar things as real life, this ones are commonly helped by technology. • Scenariosà the use of different possibilities, using the question what if? • Learning laboratories: This one analyzes the the situations that the company is leading or leaves, identify which one corresponds to the change. This one is divided in three types.  Learning: acquisitions of knowledge or creation of knowledge  Performance: actions, behaviors, processes, measure of results.  Change: Explicit change, something in the company changed. 4. Source of changes could be: • Changes: when something is not as the same way it was before  Reactive: when the company makes a change when there is a problem.  Proactive: When the company makes a change before any problem occur. • Internal: might be the organizational climate. • External: how the company works will be see from others. And this one’s could be ......

Words: 431 - Pages: 2

Organizational Learning

...Knowledge Management. Contemporary Trends and Issues ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING Povilas Brilius Baifoteka Ltd, Lithuania, Abstract: Organizational Learning (OL) is recognized to have established itself as a discipline. However, it remains unclear what it is primarily focused onto – practical problem solving or theoretical descriptive analysis. Due to largely fragmented literature, sometimes interweaving concepts and a variety of attitudes, practitioners find it difficult to easily apply this field, meantime theorists call for more comprehensive understanding of OL. This article focuses on contemporary trends in OL research. It argues and unveils that current OL investigation has made a shift towards holistic and integrative approach in which individual has more powers to make a decision. Article illustrates such contemporary shift of mind by (a) summarizing most important literature in the field (b) providing examples of latest research in OL area. For a smoother analysis, author builds and applies working framework of dichotomies between concepts (dialectical approach). Keywords: organizational learning, contemporary trends, holism. JEL Classification: D800, D830 1. Introduction During the last 50-60 years Organizational Learning (OL) has undoubtedly established itself as a discipline – a number of concepts have been constructed and applied theoretically, numerous schools with distinct models have emerged. However, a question may be posed – to what...

Words: 13772 - Pages: 56

Organizational Learning

...The organizational structure of any company is important. The structure of a business shows how it is managed and organized and can be split into several departments that operate separately with different levels of responsibility. Depending on the industry of the business, having several departments that operate separately will give a company a number of advantages. For example, to distinguish the differences in the products and services a company has to offer will show the work flow of the company, and offer a variety of products and services to clientele for a specific business. Versatility in a business can be very advantageous because it will give a client a variety of services to choose from. Top Job Staffing, Inc. is a hospitality service company with a structure similar to the one mentioned above. They provide professional bartenders, trained banquet staff and culinary services. Services are provided for banquets, hotels, country clubs, private residence, and corporate events. Top Job Staffing has a very stringent screening process for applicants that apply for positions with the organization. Appearance and attitude are a major focus for deciding which applicants have the required skill level to meet the benchmarks established by the company, in addition to meeting client needs. A part of the screening process requires each applicant to complete a mandatory three day training class regardless of the number of years of experience. The structure......

Words: 298 - Pages: 2

Organizational Learning

...Learning organization is a concept of collective learning that results from individual or team learning. The concept can be seen as a win-win situation based on the argument that individuals can develop as the organization grows. A learning organization may choose to empower workers by giving greater decision making power, how to complete their tasks and work in self managed teams (Spencer and Kelly, 2013) In this essay, various debates and case studies on organizational learning and learning organization will be identified and it will be discussed if the concept is in fact based on firm foundations. According to Spencer and Kelly, 2013 workplace learning needs to begin with the substantive issues of equity, power, authority, control and ownership. Large corporations create hierarchies of control and power and are driven by the profit motive. These control, power and profit relations create the social relations within work and society. When looking at income equity, from September 2010 to September 2011 the average earnings of Canadians rose by 1.1% while the top 100 CEOs income rose by 27% (CCPA, 2012). Additionally, HRM policies create a “sense of shared ownership” and control of the enterprise but the “sense of ownership” is not the same thing as workers actually owning and controlling and could be regarded as a form of propaganda. The idea is to increase productivity and commitment which would lift labour performance higher- “committed employees would “go the extra......

Words: 1388 - Pages: 6

Knowledge Management & Organizational Learning

... Knowledge Management & Organizational Learning Knowledge has always been available to mankind. Many people have had their concerns and doubts about how to effectively create, acquire, communicate and improve on how to re-use knowledge. Within the last two decades a unique field called Knowledge Management (KM) has transpired. With the sudden emergence of KM, a brand new realization has been presented to society. It’s a known fact that human begins have not been able to draw on the full potential of their brains. (King 2008). Just like with the human brain it’s also the backbone on how companies and organizations are started. Is it possible through KM, for organizations to seek and obtain potentially useful knowledge? Can it be made available to those when needed and appropriate for them to achieve maximum effective usage in order to make an influential and impactful gain in an organizations performance? To understand if KM could help an organization maximize potentially useful knowledge and achieve influential gains and performances one has to fully understand knowledge. Knowledge is commonly defined as a “justified personal belief”. Knowledge is separated into two distinctive fundamentals, tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge. Tacit knowledge is knowledge that a person already possesses and helps determine how they already think and act. It links physical and cognitive skills, and cognitive frameworks. A common inspection of tacit knowledge is that......

Words: 2081 - Pages: 9

Leadership, Organizational Culture and Knowledge Management

...Examining the effect of leadership behavior and organizational culture on knowledge management Introduction: From 1993 knowledge was an important economic resources and to gain the competitive advantage organization should have emphasis on knowledge. Now a day its knowledge based economy in which knowledge based organizations have focus on the process of knowledge management which is knowledge creation, knowledge acquiring/learning, knowledge sharing and knowledge transferring. Organizational knowledge has two types tacit and explicit knowledge. Tacit knowledge basically subjective and experiential based which cannot be express in words while explicit knowledge based on objective and rational knowledge which can be express in words. According to Maggie Haines, NHS Acting Director of KM “Knowledge management is a process that emphasizes generating, capturing and sharing information know how and integrating these into business practices and decision making for greater organizational benefit.” Leaders play important and significant role in developing and maintenance the culture in an organization. An effective leader should be have understanding of organizational culture so that they can implement knowledge management effectively (S.K. Sharma & A. Sharma, 2010). Organizational culture means believe and value structure in an organization. We have taken two approaches of leadership; transformational and transactional leadership behavior. Problem statement: In......

Words: 2324 - Pages: 10

Knowledge Management in Organizational Learning

...Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning William R. King Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh For centuries, scientists, philosophers and intelligent laymen have been concerned about creating, acquiring, and communicating knowledge and improving the re-utilization of knowledge. However, it is only in the last 15–20 years or so that a distinct field called “knowledge management” (KM) has emerged. KM is based on the premise that, just as human beings are unable to draw on the full potential of their brains, organizations are generally not able to fully utilize the knowledge that they possess. Through KM, organizations seek to acquire or create potentially useful knowledge and to make it available to those who can use it at a time and place that is appropriate for them to achieve maximum effective usage in order to positively influence organizational performance. It is generally believed that if an organization can increase its effective knowledge utilization by only a small percentage, great benefits will result. Organizational learning (OL) is complementary to KM. An early view of OL was “encoding inferences from history into routines that guide behavior” (Levitt and March, 1988, p. 319). So, OL has to do with embedding what has been learned into the fabric of the organization. 1 The Basics of Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning To understand KM and OL, one must understand knowledge, KM...

Words: 4815 - Pages: 20

Learning Organizations and Organizational

...Learning Organizations and Organizational Learning Organizations and Organizational Introduction The world today is experiencing the most rapid pace of change in its history. The purpose of this essay is to discuss what organizational structure is suitable in the business circumstances of today. This essay is to mainly break down piece by piece what learning organizations are and how they come together. To support this argument, firstly organizations will be defined, and then the properties that make an organization effective will be identified. Next organizational structure will be appraised, and what constitutes business environment will be established. Once that has been fully established a quick summary will be provided to reiterate the main source if this paper. Definition Organizational structure is defined as ‘the organization’s formal framework by which job tasks are divided, grouped and coordinated’ (Robbins et al., 2000: 351). Generally an organizations’ structure is considered to be the managerial framework that directs the non-managerial employees. Traditionally western organizational structure can be argued to have developed from the feudal system of government where a strict pyramidal power and class structure existed. Termed as mechanistic organizations they are described by Robbins et al. as being ‘characterized by high specialization, extensive departmentalization, narrow spans of control, high formalization, a limited information network, and little......

Words: 1274 - Pages: 6

Organizational Learning

...Organizational Learning and Decision-Making: A Southeastern School District and Elementary School Greg Alford, DA University of Phoenix Org 714 Organizational Learning and Decision-Making: A Southeastern School District and Elementary School Although learning should be an easy task for a school and school system, the bureaucracy of a public educational system presents many obstacles to substantive learning on the part of the employees and the smoothness of the decision-making process. This paper examines the opportunities for organizational learning and the decision-making process in southeastern U.S. school district and specifically at an elementary school Pre-K CDC Program. What is Organizational Learning and Decision-Making? Organizational learning is the process through which managers seek to improve organization members’ desire and ability to understand and manage the organization and its environment so they make decisions that continuously raise organizational effectiveness. There are two types of organizational learning strategies that may be pursued by any group: exploration and exploitation. Exploration is a method where organizational members learn of ways to improve existing organizational activities and procedures through experimentation. Exploitation is where those members refine and improve on existing activities and procedures to increase effectiveness (Jones, 2010). Organizational decision-making is the process of responding to a problem by......

Words: 2773 - Pages: 12

Pikari-Teshima | 八神浩树 | My mad fat diary