Origins of Criminal Law

In: Other Topics

Submitted By ang031985
Words 1809
Pages 8
Origins of American Criminal Law

Angel Vance

Scott Levasseur

LEG 320


This weeks assignment is about the Origins of American Criminal Law. In my

paper I am going to talk about the fourteenth amendment to the US Constitution. The

Fourteenth amendment talks about the rights guaranteed privileges and immunities of

citizenship, due process, and equal protection. In section one of this amendment it states:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction

thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State

shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens

of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property,

without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal

protection of the laws.”

In section two it states: “Representatives shall be apportioned among the several

States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in

each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the

choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives

in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the

Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-

one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for

participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be

reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole

number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.”

In section three of the amendment it states: “No person shall be a…...

Similar Documents

Criminal Law

...Cunningham [1957] (CA) | Interpretation of malicious, subjective recklessness. | -Held that malicious= foresight of consequences;-D must have foreseen consequences;-The accused has foreseen some sort of harm might take place, and has still taken the risk anyway. | R v Caldwell [1982] (HL)-OVERRULED BY R v G- | Objective test for Recklessness | -Failure to recognise obvious risk = as bad as appreciating it and continuing;-Established test of reasonable man; | R v G [2004] (HL) | Recklessness, Criminal Damage | -Overruled Caldwell as the R man test failed to take into account individual’s ability to recognise risk;-Caldwell imposed liability on those who were incapable (i.e. minors).-Has to be aware of the risk | R v Latimer (1886) | Transferred Malice, successful transfer | MR is the same for both offences therefore malice is successfully transferred. | R v Pembilton (1874) | Transferred Malice, unsuccessful transfer | MR of throwing stone at D was different to the MR of criminal damage (breaking the window). | Murder | R v Cunningham [1982] | Malice Aforethought | Malice aforethought defined as:-Intention to kill;-OR Intention to inflict GBH | R v Woolin [1999] | Oblique intention | -Jury may find intention of murder/GBH if it was a Virtually certain consequence. | Voluntary Manslaughter | R v Dietschmann [2003] | Intoxication, Multiple causes of abnormality of mind | -No requirement of the abnormality of mind being the sole cause of the killing;-Even if D......

Words: 1515 - Pages: 7

Criminal Law

...TABLE OF CONTENTS TO CRIM LAW (Levine) I. Overview of CJS A. Theories of Punishment 1. Utilitarian 2. Retributive B. Who should be punished? 1. Excuse (Because of personal condition X I shouldn’t be punished) 2. Justification (I acted in the right way and don’t deserve to be punished) C. Principles that Limit Punishment 1. Legality, Vagueness Lenity II. Components of a Crime A. Actus Reus 1. Conduct 2. Attendant Circumstances 3. Social Harm 4. Causation a. Actual Causation b. Proximate Cause i. Common law: Intervening Cause? ii. MPC: Built into culpability standards 5. Concurrence of Elements B. Mens Rea 1. Common Law Standard 2. MPC Culpability Standard 3. Specific Intent 4. Transferred Intent 5. Strict Liability Crimes 6. Role of Mistake a. Mistake of Fact b. Mistake of Law C. Concurrence of Elements III. Homicide A. Common Law 1. Murder a. 1st Degree Murder b. 2nd Degree Murder 2. Manslaughter a. Adequate Provocation b. Criminal Negligence c. Misdemeanor-Mansalguther B. MPC 1. Murder 2. Manslaughter 3. Criminal Negligence C. Felony Murder Rule 1. Limitations a.......

Words: 17656 - Pages: 71

Criminal Law

...Criminal Law Evaluation This paper is going to examine both the sources and purposes of criminal law. In addition to Identifying and explaining jurisdiction of individual states, local, and federal enforce of criminal law. Moreover, there are two standards of proof in criminal cases proof beyond reasonable doubt and the other one is a criminal act has to have been committed with criminal intent. Adversarial system is important to the criminal justice system because it consist of two advocates representing two different sides in front of a jury or judge to determine what is true and false. Discuss and differentiate the concepts of criminal liability and accomplice liability. Also, three different types of inchoate offenses that will be discussed are solicitation, conspiracy, and attempt. The purpose of criminal law is to make sure society does not experience harm, to warn them of the consequences, to define what the intent is for all offenses, to inform society of the seriousness of the of offenses, to punish people for their wrong doings, and to make sure the victim and anyone connected including the public receive justice (Schmalleger, 2010). Criminal law also provides society with regulations and informs people of the consequences for breaking the law. For example, it makes a distinction in regard to petty and severe crimes. In addition to conveying criminal laws purpose is to keep society safe by giving and enforcing rules with deterrence, rehabilitation, and......

Words: 1674 - Pages: 7

Criminal Law

...Short Paper #2: Felonies and Misdemeanors Lace Jenkins Unit 7 PA260: Criminal Law Prof: Edward Romano There are many things in considering what scenario to choose. You have to consider if they think the wine bottle is a deadly weapon. I will explain what argument I will use and why I chose that argument. I will also explain why I didn’t chose the other argument. I will give you definitions of aggravated assault, aggravated battery, simple assault and simple battery. I would not chose argument number 2 Sharon should not be charged with aggravated assault and battery, but only simple assault and battery, since no deadly weapon was used. The reason I would chose this argument is because I would say the wine bottle was not a deadly weapon. I would research and see if there were cases that were similar to this case. I would prove that the wine bottle was not broken at the time of the event and that is why it was not a deadly weapon. Here is a case of a women hitting her husband with a wine bottle. Susan Van Cook, 42, of Trails End was charged with two misdemeanors (Leslie Korngold). I would not chose argument number 1 because it would be hard to prove by reasonable doubt that she did this because she was drunk. I am thinking that if you use argument number 1 you could also say she was afraid he was going to hit her first. I think that this argument would be too hard to prove. I could be wrong and this may be easier to prove then I think. Here are the definitions of...

Words: 952 - Pages: 4

Criminal Law

...From: Brittani Herring To: Reader Date: July 24, 2013 Re: Status Punishment Facts In the case of Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962), the Supreme Court ruled that a law may not punish a status; i.e., one may not be punished to being an alcoholic or for being addicted to drugs. However, of course, one may be punished for actions such as abusing drugs. The question becomes; What if the status “forces” the action? What if a person, because of his/her addiction to drugs, is “forced” by the addiction to purchase and abuse the illegal drugs? Would punishing that person be unfairly punishing a status? Issue The issue in this case is whether or not punishing a person that is addicted to drugs to be unfairly punishing a status? Applicable Law La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 40:962 provides in part: A. It is unlawful for any person to manufacture, possess, have under his control, sell, give, deliver, transport, prescribe, administer dispense, or compound any narcotic drug, except as provided in this sub-part or to become an addict as defined in La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 40:961. Section 40:961(1) provides that "addict" means a person who habitually uses one or more of the narcotic drugs defined in § 40:961 to such an extent as to create a tolerance for such drug, or drugs, and who does not have a medical need for the use of such drug, or drugs. In the case of State v. Bruno, 253 La. 669 (La. 1969), the defendant claimed that La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 40:961, 40:962 upon which......

Words: 1167 - Pages: 5

Criminal Law and Criminal Conduct

...Criminal Conduct and Criminal Law LEG 320 July 25, 2014 Strayer University CRIMINAL CONDUCT AND CRIMINAL LAW Actus rea and mens rea are both important elements to convicting anyone for any crime. The actual commitment of a criminal act is actus rea. The guilty or criminal mind state is mens rea. Despite the fact that both actus rea and mens rea do not have to exist a conviction is still very feasible. When a criminal act is committed and the individual does not have to mens rea or guilty mind in some instances without the required mental state no crime is committed. Persons incapable of entertaining the required criminal mind because of legal insanity have not committed a crime. Working with individuals who have been diagnosis with mental retardation has really opened my mind to the element of mens rea when the individual has done something illegal. Some of the individuals have it in their mind that because the have been diagnosis with mental retardation they can not be held responsible for the criminal act they may commit or have committed, I have even heard many of the individuals say it. Does this mental state qualify them of the required state of mind for conviction? Immunity as a defense works in some cases not all. Immunity is the exemplification from criminal prosecution based on statues, the U.S. Constitution or international agreements. Diplomatic immunity is granted to those who are visiting foreign officials. Diplomatic immunity can also be waived by...

Words: 983 - Pages: 4

Criminal Law

...Introduction Crimes are part of society and this is the reason why law enforcers come up with different ways for controlling crime. Some of the critical measures for controlling crime are physical while others are psychological. The method of controlling crime is determined by the nature and complexity of the crime. Once these factors are taken into consideration then the best way of controlling crime is sought. The deterrence theory is a theory that has been extensively used as an effective way of controlling crime. The deterrence theory is in two parts: specific deterrence and general deterrence. Specific deterrence tends to focus on the individual with the aim of changing his deviant behavior by punishment. Contrary, general deterrence is whereby an individual is punished in public so as to instill fear to individuals who may prove to be deviant in the future. According to the crimes by Phil Cresta in the United States of America, the deterrence theory is one which would be effective in controlling his criminal nature. The main reason for this notion is his crimes were repetitive. By using deterrence, Cresta would have fear of committing crimes simultaneously and he would finally stop. Therefore, by using deterrence, fear would be instilled in him and this would prevent him from committing the crimes. In Phil Cresta’s case, specific deterrence would not have been as appropriate as general deterrence. General deterrence would have been an appropriate corrective......

Words: 1123 - Pages: 5

Criminal Law

...Executive announcing the passing away of such calamity.chanrobles virtual law library Convicts who, under the circumstances mentioned in the preceding paragraph, shall give themselves up to the authorities within the above mentioned period of 48 hours, shall be entitled to the deduction provided in Article 98.chanrobles virtual law library Art. 159. Other cases of evasion of service of sentence. — The penalty of prision correccional in its minimum period shall be imposed upon the convict who, having been granted conditional pardon by the Chief Executive, shall violate any of the conditions of such pardon. However, if the penalty remitted by the granting of such pardon be higher than six years, the convict shall then suffer the unexpired portion of his original sentence.chanrobles virtual law library Chapter Seven COMMISSION OF ANOTHER CRIME DURING SERVICE OF PENALTY IMPOSED FOR ANOTHER PREVIOUS OFFENSE Art. 160. Commission of another crime during service of penalty imposed for another offense; Penalty. — Besides the provisions of Rule 5 of Article 62, any person who shall commit a felony after having been convicted by final judgment, before beginning to serve such sentence, or while serving the same, shall be punished by the maximum period of the penalty prescribed by law for the new felony. chan robles virtual law library Any convict of the class referred to in this article, who is not a habitual criminal, shall be pardoned at the age of seventy years if he shall......

Words: 6918 - Pages: 28

Constitutional Law and Criminal Law

...Constitution does not explicitly allow courts to review legislative and executive actions to determine whether they are constitutional, but early common law established a process called judicial law Judicial law is the power of a court to review legislative and executive actions, such as a law or an official act of a government employee or agent, to determine whether they are constitutional Established in 1803 U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison Also allows courts to review constitutionality of lower courts’ decisions Supremacy clause, located in Article VI of Constitution, provides that the Constitution, laws, and treaties of the U.S. constitute the supreme law of the land Any state or local law that directly conflicts with the Constitution, federal laws, or treaties is void Federal laws include rules passed by federal administrative agencies In some areas, the state and federal governments have concurrent authority; both governments have the power to regulate the same subject matter In these cases, the state may regulate in the area as long as a person’s compliance with the state regulation would not cause them to be in violation of a federal regulation Other times, the federal government can decide to regulate that area exclusively In these cases, according to doctrine of federal preemption, the state law is unconstitutional Federal preemption is a principle asserting the supremacy of federal legislation over state legislation when both pertain to the......

Words: 2852 - Pages: 12

Criminal Law

...would be a spouse seeking to hire an assassin to murder their husband or wife. The murder need not take place for an offense to have been committed. The preliminary offense is the solicitation and hiring of the assassin and the person who hired that assassin could be charged criminally even if the murder was not carried out. solicitation is requesting, encouraging or demanding someone to engage in criminal conduct, with the intent to facilitate or contribute to the commission of that crime. Most commonly, solicitation refers to solicitation of prostitution the crime of soliciting someone to engage in prostitution.Though state laws vary, to be guilty of solicitation, one must: request that someone else engage in criminal conduct; and have the intention to engage in criminal conduct with that person. A criminal conspiracy exists when two or more people agree to commit almost any unlawful act, then take some action toward its competition. Then the action taken need not itself be a crime but it must indicate those involved in the conspiracy knew the plan and intended on breaking the law. For example, Andy, Dan, and Alice plan a bank robbery. They 1) visit the bank first to assess security, 2) pool their money and buy a gun together, and 3) write a demand letter. All three can be charged with conspiracy to commit robbery, regardless of whether the robbery itself is actually attempted or completed. I have learned that you don't have to actually do the crime to do the time.......

Words: 356 - Pages: 2

Criminal Law

...Criminal law is something that is very important because it protects the good people in society from the ones who tend to break the law. Each jurisdiction has its own laws and the way things are handled, but overall each jurisdiction has the same basis of criminal law to protect the people and to prosecute the criminals. Criminal law sets procedures for arrests, searches and seizures, and interrogations. It also establishes the rules that are set in place for a trial and punishment for offenders. Some of the sources of criminal law are common law, criminal statues, and the Model Penal code. Common law is a judge made law that was created by judges by declaring that certain crimes were punishable. Some of the crimes are murder, rape, arson, and burglary which fall under the types of offenses they are criminal acts, taboo acts (defiant behavior and violation of Mores), and violation of Norms (uncivilized behavior, immoral behavior.) Over all the basis of criminal law was common law, but now statutory law is the common law. The penal code itself is not a law, but can be used when a state is developing or revising its statutory codes. The Model Penal Code is very important, because it sets some boundaries in criminal law and has been used for many criminal statues and has many legal formulations. When you talk about criminal law, there is also a jurisdiction that is set in place for criminals. Jurisdiction is something that covers several areas; for instance if a county......

Words: 882 - Pages: 4

Origins of American Criminal Law

...The Fourth Amendment The Fourth Amendment focus on search and seizure law and it declare that gives a person the right to be protected against unjustifiable searches and seizures shall not be dishonored, and no warrants can be issue without probable cause. The fourth amendment is significant because the creator of the constitution recognized that government interference in the rights of the public was criminal. At one-time country laws were absent in regards to privacy matters. The government had limitless control to stop, investigate, and interrogate any person of their choosing in a group without any noticeable cause to do so. Harassment from a person of higher authorities was commonplace and the typical resident had no opportunity to stop unjustifiable searches and seizures. Today, the fourth amendment safeguards the general public from superfluous governmental actions. As a result, it compel the government to follow a reasonable standard when it extend to the privacy and the idea that a person is innocent until guilty confirmed, and privacy is vital until realistic suspicion put forward that guilt has been publicized. Powers of the Federal Government vs. the State Government The Constitution outlines and confines the authority of the federal government, identifies the connection between the federal government and separate state governments, as well as guarantees the constitutional rights of the people of the United States. Articles I to Articles VI in the Constitution......

Words: 922 - Pages: 4

Criminal Law

...Criminal Law Midterm Part B Crime has been part of the human condition since people began to live in groups. Ancient documents indicate that activities such as murder, theft, and robbery were defined as criminal by civilizations that existed before biblical times. The bible recounts stories of crimes such as Cain killing Abel, and the parable of the Good Samaritan, who came to the assistance of a man who had been assaulted and robbed.[i] Criminal laws regulate human behavior and tell people what they cannot do and in some instances, what they must do under certain circumstances. Throughout history, all societies have had criminal codes regulating conduct .Democracies have always sought to transform their basic principles and ideals into achievable goals through a system of laws that balance the rights of individuals with the compelling needs of society as a whole. These goals include public order, domestic tranquility, and protection of the basic rights of individuals.[ii] Because governments in democracies are the servants and not the masters of the people, laws should be the product of the will of the people. Criminal justice systems in democracies operate most successfully when the majority of people believe that the laws are reasonable and that the system can operate efficiently and effectively. The issue of what laws should be enacted often causes serious public debate. Laws are enacted by elected representatives of the people they are......

Words: 2852 - Pages: 12

Origins of American Criminal Law

...Origins of American Criminal Law Assignment 1 LEG 320: Criminal Law Professor Gloria Sodaro Strayer University April 23, 2012 Origins of American Criminal Law: This report will cover four different parts that are crucial to how American criminal laws came about. The first part will consist of one Amendment of my choosing that is related to the protection of people, their property, or criminal law itself. The second part is on the specific powers that the federal government has been granted with to make criminal laws versus those our state governments have been grant with. The third part will define, compare and contrast the four main goals of our criminal justice system. Then the last part will explain what is meant by police power and the limitations to that power. In order to understand and interpret any one of the Amendments to our Constitution, we need to know what the word amendment means. The definition of the word amendment is a correction or alteration of a manuscript, document, or record usually to improve it according to The American Heritage® Dictionary (The American Heritage® Dictionary, 2012). The Amendment this report will talk about is the Fourth Amendment. This Amendment is the search and seizure amendment. The Fourth Amendment to me means that the government cannot conduct unlawful searches and seizures of any one person and their property (Territo, Halsted, & Bromley, 2004). I think that the purpose of this Amendment is important because it......

Words: 1401 - Pages: 6

Criminal Law

...Ex Post Facto and Bill of Attainder Provisions California Coast University BCJ360-SG Criminal Law 2. What is the historical basis of the ex post facto and bill of attainder provisions, and why would they have application in today’s legal system? Ex Post Facto means “After the Fact” is law that is made retroactive to punish an act that wasn't illegal at the time it was committed. The reason the Constitution prevents Congress and the states from writing ex post facto laws is to protect the population and other entities from government abuse or prosecuted for an act that was not a crime at the time it was committed. This could also cause for increased severity of punishment or by adding new penalties or extending terms of the original punishment. A bill of attainder is any act of a legislative body declaring a person or group of persons guilty of a crime and assessing a punishment without the benefit of trial. Bills of attainder were commonly used in England during the 18th century and were applied to the British colonies. Anger over the application of bills attainder in the colonies was one of the motivations for the American Revolution. Ex Post Facto and Bill of Attainder would have application in today’s legal system in a negative way. Anytime a person is not afforded their due process and their individual rights it is a gross miscarriage of justice. The innovation and problem with illegal and illicit drugs could be a way that Ex Post...

Words: 376 - Pages: 2

Self Assessment and Review of Biochemistry Medical 454 Pages 938589174X | One Piece 885 It's Brulee! | phim tết 2014