P and G Swot

In: Business and Management

Submitted By sundasj
Words 588
Pages 3
S. W. O. T. Analysis :( P & G)
Strengths
• The large scale, on which the P & G operates, is one of its strengths. It is a global leader for different product categories like fabric, home, baby, beauty, health and personal care in many countries. Its three hundred products are sold in over one hundred and eighty countries.
• The strong branding of P & G makes it one of the most successful brands in the world.
• The company has a vast experience in oral and personal hygiene products as they are working since….
• Also, it has an extensive experience in marketing in different market segments and is one of the best marketers in the world.
• P & G is tightly integrated with some of the largest retailers in United States of America as well as world around. and around the world Distribution channels all over the world
• Gross profit margin of the company is 15 times the industry average
• P & G is known for its diverse brand portfolio. The company is able to customize its global products and brands according to the local preferences.
• P & G invests greatly in its research and development to. About $2 billion are invested every year by P & G for improving and introducing new products. The end-consumer understanding of P & G and its large database of consumers make its research and development strong.
Weaknesses
• Many of the top brands of P & G are losing their market share rapidly. In online media leadership and presence P & G is lagging behind.
• The beauty and health products by P & G are mostly for women.
• P & G does not make and offer any private label products for the retail customers and is, missing an opportunity.
• The large scale operation of the company makes the culture heavy and processes slow. This also leads to quality control problems.
• P & G does not divest its weak or poor brands.
• .The major customers of P & G are located at some of…...

Similar Documents

P&G Case

...Australia, New Zealand, India, Pakistan, Philippines, Indonesia, Taiwan, Japan, Thailand, Singapore and Malaysia are all managed by P&G’s Asia-Pacific Regional Headquarters in Hongkong. P&G-Asia’s major brands include Pampers, Always, Head and Shoulders, Rejoice, Oil of Ulan, Clearasil, Camay, Zest and Vicks. One of the P&G subsidiaries in Asia is in Singapore. P&G-Singapore which has 70 staff is headed by a managing director which is also responsible for Malaysian operations. Feminine pads/napkins are one of the products that are being produced by P&G. Always, a brand of feminine pad that was introduced in three lead markets (i.e. U.S., Saudi Arabia & Singapore) in 1983 was an initial success. When introduced in Japan, P&G was blocked from using Always because of trademark reasons. Because of this, the name Whisper was used instead and luckily it was successful. In 1988, competition in the feminine pad market is composed of three major competitors: Kimberly Clark’s Kotex (35% market share) , P&G’s Always (25%) and Kau Laurier (20%). Eight other brands competed for the remaining market share. P&G was the largest market spender in 1989 where it outspent Kotex and Kao five and four times respectively. They spent two thirds of their media budgets in television, one third in print. The three are evenly matched in product line breadth. However, P&G believed that Always was superior in absorption capability, protection and comfort. Other comparisons were as......

Words: 1418 - Pages: 6

P&G Supply Chain

...CASE STUDY December 2002 Procter & Gamble: Building A Smarter Supply Chain Issue/Solution To remain profitable, consumer products manufacturers must find ways to optimize the performance of their supply chains. They need to support marketing promotions better and avoid frustrating consumers with out-of-stock situations in the store. Situation • Procter & Gamble realized it needed a “consumer-driven supply network” to stay ahead in the consumer packaged goods industry. Retailing’s “first moment of truth” is a key focus area for P&G. When the shopper reaches the shelf, is the product there? • Discoveries • • Links between supply chain and CRM processes are critical. Business leads, technology follows. But the technology must be proven, practical and scalable. Even with immature solutions, it is possible to get rapid payback on streamlined demand and fulfillment processes for critical products. A harmonized ERP applications backbone is a basic requirement. • • Recommendations • Secure management support before you start redesigning your supply network. Don’t let politics condemn the initiative to failure. Leverage the value IT can bring in connecting demand and supply side business processes. Simplify your applications architecture to allow collaborative business processes and cope with changes in network alliances. • • Dig Deeper • • • Related Research from GartnerG2 Gartner Core Research Methodology Maria Jimenez with Derek......

Words: 3062 - Pages: 13

P&G Case Study

...Summary Statement/Abstract P&G is a global company that is involved in many different markets including beauty and grooming and household care. The company has been through a lot of change due to the O2005 project that was undertaken in 1999 and saw a complete overhaul of the company during those years. One product that also was involved a lot during that time was the SK-II skin care product which was popular in Japan and a man named de Cesare wanted to take the product global to either the Chinese or European market. However, in order to do this there was a lot of analysis and research which had to be done to determine which market was the best to move the product to and de Cesare had to make a recommendation to the GLT knowing that he must do everything possible to make sure he made the best decision possible. As Paolo DeCesare, what factors do you need to consider before deciding what to recommend in your SK-II presentation to the global leadership team (GLT)? What kind of analysis will you need to do in preparing for that meeting? As Paolo DeCesare there are a lot of factors to consider before deciding what to recommend in the SK-II presentation to the GLT. The biggest factor of course to consider is the profitability of the market or markets that would be chosen to enter in an effort to have SK-II become a global brand within P&G. In order to determine this there is a lot of analysis that goes into determining whether a market will be profitable and could......

Words: 2406 - Pages: 10

P&G Case

...P&G Case Executive Summary This case study analysis is on the Proctor & Gamble Company (also referred to as “P&G”). Procter & Gamble is the world's largest producer of household and personal products by revenue, with its products reaching 4 billion people worldwide. The Case Study includes an Introduction, Company Overview, Company Mandate, Internal Analysis, and External Analysis, followed by various Strategic Options (see below). The author then makes a Final Strategy Option Recommendation. Strategic Option #1: Market to Lower-Income Consumers in both Developed and Emerging Markets (Expand and Build Beauty Segment strictly aimed at Low-Income Consumers). Industry Consolidator. Strategic Option #2: Given the maturity of the North American/Western European market, combined with the emerging popularity and demand for Natural/Organic ingredient products, P&G should look to create New Natural Products and Products tailored to the Male market - Multiple Segments, not just Skin Care (Expand and Build Beauty Segment). Industry Consolidator. Strategic Option #3: Related Diversification through Acquisition. Strategic Option #4: Joint Ventures in Emerging Markets such as China and India. Final Strategy Recommendation: The Recommendation is to go for a combined Low-Income segment and New Natural Product strategy as this facilitates P&G’s need to capture a greater slice of the Low-Income consumer market both in Mature and Developing markets, which also capturing a......

Words: 3683 - Pages: 15

P&G Corparate

...Statement (Actual) 4 Mission Statement (Proposed) 4 Vision Statement (Proposed) 5 Slogan (Proposed) 5 The CPM Matrix of P&G Company 6 External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix for Procter and Gamble (P&G) 9 The I/E matrix for Procter and Gamble (P&G) 14 Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix for Procter and Gamble (P&G) 16 A SWOT Matrix of P&G Company 21 Strengths 23 Weaknesses 23 Opportunities 24 Threats 24 The FOUR strategies 25 The SPACE Matrix 26 Calculation 27 The SPACE Matrix chart 28 The BCG Matrix 29 The BCG Matrix chart 29 The Recommended Long-Term Planning 30 Income Statement and Balance Sheet for Procter and Gamble (P&G) 32 The Recommended Annual Objectives & Policies 35 The Recommended procedures for strategy review and evaluations 35 References: 37 Case Abstraction The Procter & Gamble Co., also known as P&G, is based in the United State of America. Mr. William Procter and Mr. James Gamble are the founders of the company in 1837, and this tell the story behind the company’s name. The P&G company is born when Mr. William, a candle maker from England and Mr. James, a soup maker from Ireland in Ohio. They are met eventually when they married sisters. The company is headquartered in downtown Cincinnati, Ohio, United States. Mr. Bob McDonald is the current CEO of P&G Company. He has a philosophy of focusing on lower-end products. Whereas, Mr. A.G. Lafley, who focus more on the......

Words: 10320 - Pages: 42

P&G Swot and Tows Analysis

... Beauty Segment l  This segment includes cosmetics, fragrances, hair care, and skin care products Beauty Segment l  l  Beauty accounts for approximately 34% of P&G’s product portfolio. 24% of Net Sales & Net Earnings –  Head & Shoulders, Olay, and Pantene are some of the biggest brands within this segment. Strength – Hair Care l  Strong focus on research&developement - promote innovation and bring new products to the Highly recognizable brand-building - shape brand-inspired, benifit-driven brands. market quicker l  l  Great product availability - products are sold at practically all domestic retailer chain and drug stores. l  Large scale production. Weakness- Hair Care l  l  l  l  Losing market share rapidly Women oriented products Limited diversity products (Women oriented products ) Limited functions (less choices for customers) Opportunities- Hair Care Hair and Beauty products for men l  Online social networks and internet marketing techniques l  Try to pursue growth overseas l  Expand brands for hair care products( cut off some other less profitable brands in the beauty segment. - objective is to invest 20 most profitable innovations l  Threats- Hair Care l  Greatest threat to P&G’s Beauty Segment is the Threat of Rivalry –  Unilever, L’Oreal l  l  Mature Market Competitors have more diversified products optional l  boost volume sales growth Price increases help to......

Words: 407 - Pages: 2

P&G Strategy

...essay will focus on the business running of Procter & Gamble in Singapore from 2005 to 2012. In 2005, P&G announced an acquisition of Gillette Company. (P&G annual report, 2005) After the acquisition, P&G acquired several new products from Gillette Company such as razors and blades and it obtained several new production lines from Gillette without the expenses on research and development. As a result of acquisition, the growth rate of net earnings of P&G in personal beauty area in 2005 was much higher than previous year. (P&G Annual Report, 2005) In this case, P&G used a related diversification strategy to increase its economics of scope. Meanwhile, since the Gillette Company is also one the most well-known company in personal beauty area, the market power of P&G had an obviously increasing in that year. According to Johnson, Scholes and Whittington (2008), synergy means that the activities or asset are more effective together than apart. Based on this acquisition, because of both P&G and Gillette had similar product in one area; so that the impact of acquisition to market was much stronger than the impact of sum them up separately. In additional, due to the acquisition of Gillette Company the distribution channel of P&G have to be operated more efficiently to meet the increasing demand. It means the diversification of help the P&G improve the efficiency of distribution channel at same time. Even though diversification strategy......

Words: 1302 - Pages: 6

P&G: Sk-Ii

...CASE STUDY ANALYSIS OF P&G: SK-II GLOBALIZATION PROJECT FOR: Professor Howard Kupferman Written by: Andres Torres Procter and Gamble Case Study Analysis Actors: 1. Alan Lafley: Head of P&G Beauty Care GBU 2. Paolo de Cesare: President of Max Factor Japan 3. Durk Jager: P&G CEO 4. GLT: Global Leadership Team (made up of business GM’s of crucial MDO’s, people from R&D, consumer research, product supply, HR, and finance). Chaired by Lafley. INTRO: In this case study we are introduced to P&G as an organization and their changes in structure overtime. More specifically, after the acquisition of Max Factor Japan and success in its SK-II line, questions are raised about whether global expansion is feasible and profitable as a franchise. De Cesare ran this skin-care line in Japan, but he reported directly to Lafley. This is crucial because global expansion would require Lafley’s approval in budgeting and organizational support. P&G recently went through major organizational changes over a period of six years known as O2005. This created huge questions in the strategy that would be put together in the case of a global expansion for SK-II. Within the U.S. Procter & Gamble originally followed an organizational structure consisting of seven different divisions that were furthermore shattered into 26 distinct categories. Each category had its own R&D, supply management and marketing. In addition, the international......

Words: 2346 - Pages: 10

P&G Case Study

...Outsourcing Award www.IAOP.org P&G: Taking Innovation to New Levels of Value through Partnership INTRODUCTION Many people believe innovation springs serendipitously from some kind of “aha” moment – literally a bolt out of the blue. P&G knows differently. Innovation has been the corporate lifeblood since P&G’s humble beginning in 1837 when William Procter and James Gamble signed a partnership agreement formalizing The Procter & Gamble Company. Today, P&G’s products touch and improve the lives of over 4.8 billion consumers in 180 countries. Fifty “Leadership Brands” include some of the world’s most well-known household names with 25 of these 50 brands each generating more than $1 billion in annual sales. Simply put, this degree of corporate growth could not be achieved without significant innovation across all aspects of the business even extending to our relationships with suppliers and partners. In 2001, P&G radically changed its approach to Research & Development (R&D). Instead of relying solely on its own, highly capable R&D resources, P&G welcomed ideas from individual entrepreneurs and scientists from other companies, and universities, the concept came to be known as Connect & Develop; the goal was to gain half the ideas from inside and half from outside the company. Connect and Develop brought many great ideas, but the question remained. How does a company like P&G drive innovation in its outsourcing efforts? After all, P&G’s outsourced service providers are......

Words: 4003 - Pages: 17

P&G Report

...l   Internal Analysis     1.       Resources (what we have)     ● Innovation  P&G is widely recognized as the industry’s global innovation leader. We collaborate with a  global network of research partners, and more than half of all product innovation coming  from P&G today includes at least one major component from an external partner. Their  contributions have consistently helped us earn honors from the IRI New Product  Pacesetters Report—the annual list of the biggest innovations in our industry. Procter &  Gamble was this year’s leader for the 2013 New Product Pacesetters list, launching seven  of the top 10 most successful non­food products of the year. Since the first Pacesetters list,  P&G has had 155 products make the top 25 Pacesetters list in non­food categories –  more than our six largest competitors combined.  ● Scale  As one of the world’s largest consumer packaged goods companies, P&G has scale  advantages across our brands, businesses, operations and people. This allows us to  share knowledge, transfer technologies, optimize our spending and flow resources to  better serve consumers and continuously improve our efficiency and productivity.  ●      Our unique organizational structure offers the global scale benefits of an  international company and the local focus to be relevant for consumers in  more than 180 countries. Our corporate structure and strong governance  practices ensure that we conduct our operations with consistently high ......

Words: 1531 - Pages: 7

P&G Decision Cockpits

...Decision Cockpits Proctor and Gamble's (P&G) innovation and willingness to invest in new technology allowed the company to streamline how it views, interprets, and gathers information. Implementing the use of technology such as Business Sufficiency, Business Spheres, and Decision Cockpits allows employees at all levels to view and make real-time decisions in the company. Executives use the Business Sufficiency software to make 6-12 month predictions about P&G's performance statistics. The goal of this software is to make leaders within the company aware of what is going on and help them to determine what actions are required to solve any issues. The software provides real-time data on issues and allows leaders to focus on these issues rather than on gathering data. P&G has seven business sufficiency models that provide information on a specific problem set. These sets identify specific variables about the problem and are key to determining how to correct the problem. Business Sufficiency is extremely effective. The most important item required in making a decision is data. If managers spend too much time searching for data they may miss the opportunity to correct an issue. Business Sufficiency ensure that executives have access to data immediately and that everyone is using the same data. Business Spheres (figure 1) are specially designed meeting rooms that have visual information displays in a spherical shape around the room. P&G has 50 areas that are......

Words: 570 - Pages: 3

P&G Analysis

...functional value. 1.2 The sales people concerned that if they launched a product without enough difference from other products, retailers would replacing units within the existing line. The sale of Scope may decline, or P&G may pay 50000 per stock-keeping unit in listing fees to add the new brand. Either way was costly. 1.3 The Market Research people concerned that Adding reassurances to a product often takes time before consumer accepts the idea. 1.4 The Market Research people concerned that if they launched new products, the new one might cannibalize a large amount of Scope’s sales.(Like warner-lambert, they launched listermint but listermint’s market share "primarily at the expense of listerine and smaller brands") 1.5 The Finance people concerned that launching a line extension would cost a large amount of money. 1.6 The Purchasing people concerned that when P&G launched new product the price of ingredients would increased by 50% and the packaging costs would increase by 0.3 USD per unit. 2 High risk 2.1 The PDD people though it was not easy to replicate Plax’s clinical results with P&G’s stringent test methodology. 2.2 Market Research people concerned that the launch of new product might not increase competitive users’ desire to purchase Scope. 2.3 If P&g launched new product, other companies would also do the same thing.(Game Theory)...

Words: 296 - Pages: 2

P&G Strategy

...in the 1990’s? • P&G’s costs were too high because of extensive duplication of manufacturing, marketing, and administrative facilities in different national subisidiaries. The duplication of assets made sense when national markets were segmented from each other by barriers to cross-border trade. (Products produced in one country could not be economically sold in another due to high tariff duties levied on imports to Germany for example). First, the changing global market created a better market for companies to expand and compete with less restrictive policies from host nations and more openness to foreign direct investment have all aligned to make the older strategy almost doomed to be defeated. Second, a combination of cheaper more efficient transportation of goods and markets more free for the import and export of materials aided to P&G losing some market share and profitability. c. What strategy does P&G appear to be moving to ward? What are the benefits of this strategy? What are the potential risks associated with it? P&G initially expanded internationally when it earned Canada in 1915. However, even after expanding into Western Europe and Asia in 1960s and 1970s, the company still maintained all product development at its headquarters location in Cincinmatim, Ohio. Subsidiary units were responsible for manufacturing, marketing, and distributing the products in their local markets. However, by the 1990s several factors caused P&G to reconsider......

Words: 698 - Pages: 3

P&G Porters and Swot

...P&G Porters and Swot Porter’s five forces Michael Porter developed a framework consisting of five competitive forces, which analyze how industry factors impact a company’s strategy. These factors are: threat of new entrants, power of buyers, power of suppliers, availability of substitutes and competitive rivalry. Threat of new entrants There are many different barriers in the FMCG industry that a new entrant would have to overcome to enter. P&G has a huge competitive advantage over new entrants due to following : Established economies of scale: P&G has huge production capabilities and which has resulted in advantage over new entrants as it will be difficult for the new entrant to compete on cost, quantity produced and price. P&G also has the first mover advantage. Distribution network: Access to existing distribution channels is a substantial barrier that new entrants have to face. Supermarkets and other retail stores have a limited amount of shelf space available for consumer goods. It is difficult for new entrants to fight for these shelf spaces as the brand recognition, consumer relationship of P&G makes it difficult for new entrants to get shelf spaces. Legal barriers: Legal barriers can also make it hard for new entrants to enter the personal products industry. A new entrant has to overcome many regulations, laws, patents, and copyrights that they have to abide by when they are entering into an industry. It is a research oriented industry and hence has...

Words: 330 - Pages: 2

P&G Porters and Swot

...entrants There are many different barriers in the FMCG industry that a new entrant would have to overcome to enter. P&G has a huge competitive advantage over new entrants due to following : Established economies of scale: P&G has huge production capabilities and which has resulted in advantage over new entrants as it will be difficult for the new entrant to compete on cost, quantity produced and price. P&G also has the first mover advantage. Distribution network: Access to existing distribution channels is a substantial barrier that new entrants have to face. Supermarkets and other retail stores have a limited amount of shelf space available for consumer goods. It is difficult for new entrants to fight for these shelf spaces as the brand recognition, consumer relationship of P&G makes it difficult for new entrants to get shelf spaces. Legal barriers: Legal barriers can also make it hard for new entrants to enter the personal products industry. A new entrant has to overcome many regulations, laws, patents, and copyrights that they have to abide by when they are entering into an industry. It is a research oriented industry and hence has lot of copyright and legal issues. This almost eliminates the threat of a new entrant in the personal products industry. Power of buyers Although P&G is an extremely large company, its future is dependent on its buyers. P&G is heavily dependent on Wal-Mart and its affiliates for generating a major part of its revenue. Sales to......

Words: 1833 - Pages: 8

Vew full schedule | 11 : الجاسوس-جزء1 | Watch movie