Strategy vs Tatics

In: Business and Management

Submitted By albin
Words 767
Pages 4

Strategy refers to a plan of action designed to achieve a particular goal. Tactics may refer to a plan, procedure, or expedient for promoting a desired end or result. Tactics planning is concerned with today but strategic planning is concerned with the future. A tactic is an action you take to execute the strategy. Tactics are the meat and bread of strategy. The usage of the words strategy and tactic in business is also derived from the original military context.


The basic definition of strategy is an organization’s long term course of action designed to deliver a unique customer experience while achieving its goals (Crane, Kerin, Hartley, & Rudelius, 2011). There are three levels of strategies in large organizations which are corporate level, business unit level and functional level. The board of directors will oversees these three levels of strategies and helps the senior management team to achieve the ultimate mission.

Strategy also involves the allocation of resources necessary to achieve the organizational goals. It also concerned with deciding what business the organization should be in, where it wants to be and how it is going to get there. To develop strategy, the senior managers need to go through different stages which includes clarify objectives, carry out internal and external audit, conduct a SWOT analysis, develop plan to achieve, implement plan, review and evaluate outcomes.

A business strategy is different from a tactic in that different tactics may be deployed as part of a single strategy. For example, one strategy to gain market share would be brand building. As part of a company's brand building strategy, they may adopt different tactics like online advertising, celebrity endorsements, product launching event and special promotions for a specific period.


Tactics are detailed day-to-day operational…...

Similar Documents

Strategy - Carlsberg vs. Heineken

...STRATEGY TD FALL 2012 JOÃO SILVEIRA LOBO | GUIDO MARETTO VS | Carlsberg vs. Heineken | TABLE OF CONTENTS Industry Overview1 Competitive Advantage and its Sustainability1 Cost Advantage1 Differentiation Advantage2 Sustainability3 Future Scenarios for the next ten years4 Strategic Options facing each Scenario5 Industry overview For thousands of years, beer has been sold in similar form and taste all over the world. However, it has remained a highly local product due to barriers such as local tastes, short shelf life, high transportation costs, taxes on imported alcoholic products and difficult-to-penetrate local distribution networks. In 1999, the top-four brewers were only accountable for 17% of global beer sales. Beer was, at that time, seen as one of the least consolidated, and least profitable, industries in FMCG. But nowadays, because of greater scale, the effects of reduced competition and the growing profitability of emerging markets, the top-four brewers control over 55% of global sales. In spite of this positive change, beer is still a local business, with local operations and brands. This consolidation can bring large benefits, such as operational leverage, efficiency in advertising expenses, increased reputation and distribution networks’ power. Although slowly, brand concentration is starting to occur both in developed and developing countries. The future prospects for beer brands tend towards industry and local brand consolidation,......

Words: 2323 - Pages: 10

Competitive Strategies Coca-Cola vs. Pepsi Co

...Competitive Strategies Coca-Cola vs. Pepsi Co Joyce Conyers Strayer University 3 May 2013 BUS 508 Online Course Instructor: Dr. Phyllis Parise Dowers Grove Campus Phone Number: (630)874-6128 / (630)456-2348 Cell phone   Question: Choose an industry in which two or more companies has historically competed to maintain a significant share of the marketplace. These could include: Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola, Apple and Microsoft, GM and Ford Motor Company, or any other well-known pair of competitors. 1. To thoroughly determine how each corporate culture differs from the other, I will start with the history of Coca Cola. Type of the company: Public Website: Employees: As of 2010, The Coca-Cola Company employed just under 140,000 people worldwide. Let’s began with the background on the Coca-Cola Company history from 1886, when an Atlanta pharmacist, Dr. John Pemberton, began to produce Coca-Cola syrup for sale in fountain drinks. The bottling business however, began in 1899 when two Chattanooga businessmen, Benjamin F. Thomas and Joseph B. Whitehead, secured the exclusive rights to bottle and sell Coca-Cola for most of the United States from The Coca-Cola Company. See “LONNIE, 2003” This agreement stayed in place and operated solely as and independent, local business until the beginning of 1980s with certain bottling franchises began to consolidate. In 1986, The Coca-Cola Company merged some of its company-owned......

Words: 1402 - Pages: 6

Hedging Strategy - Mcdonald's vs Nodal's Logistics

...Hedging Strategies: McDonald’s Vs. Nodal’s Logistics Name: Mohssen Owlad Lecturer: Professor Mar Paronich Date: 21/07/13 INTRODUCTION Most companies around the world, which are dependent on any facility or transaction outside of the country of the origin, would encounter global market risks. Companies might be impacted by some global market risk, including foreign currency fluctuation and changes in interest rates. Therefore, when a company investment goes abroad and involves a foreign currency, global market risks are expected. All the companies employ several financial instruments and hedging activities to protect their investments. Different companies prefer various hedging strategies based on nature of their businesses and the risks’ areas they are exposed to. Hedging strategies can be applied to reduce devaluation effects and foreseen fluctuations in interest rates. In this assignment two different hedging strategies used by different companies will be discussed. McDonald’s Co. and Nodal’s Logistics are two companies that have applied certain hedging strategies to mitigate the impact of severe changes in currency and interest rates. McDonald’s Co. has its own risk management objective and strategy to tackle hedging transactions and all relationships between hedging instruments and hedging items. McDonald’s Co.’s derivatives that are appointed as hedging instruments have focused on interest rate swaps, foreign currency forwards and foreign currency options,......

Words: 1161 - Pages: 5

Bus 508 - Assignment 2 - Coca Cola vs. Pepsi - Competitive Strategies

...Coca Cola vs. Pepsi: Competitive Strategies Christoper Gilchrist BUS 508 7/28/2013 Coca Cola and Pepsi marketing are a consumer products company operating in highly competitive markets. They heavily rely on continued demand for products. To generate profit and bonus, they both must sell products that appeal to our customers and to consumers. Any significant changes in consumer preferences or any inability on the part to anticipate or react to such changes could result in reduced demand for our products and erosion of our competitive and financial position (Dyer, Jeffrey H., page 3). The achievements of Pepsi and Coca Cola relies on being able to answer to daily needs of buyers, concerning health and wellness, obesity, product attributes and ingredients, and to broaden into similar categories. Changes in product category consumption or consumer demographics could indicate a deductible demand for the good that’s produced. Consumer preferences could change for many reasons, such as generations being affected by the age (Hoffman, Benjamin, page 17). Socializing has also expanded and became very diverse. Traveling, vacation or leisure activity patterns, weather, seasonal consumption cycles, negative publicity resulting from regulatory action or litigation against companies in our industry, a downturn in economic conditions or taxes specifically targeting the consumption of our products. Any of these changes may reduce consumers’ willingness to purchase the goods of......

Words: 994 - Pages: 4

Comparison of the Resource-Based vs Market-Based View Approaches to Competitive Strategy

...the resource-based view as approaches to competitive strategy. To what extent are they rival or complementary views? Competitive strategy, after Porter, came to be defined as the strategy of a business unit which seeks to achieve sustainable Competitive Advantage (SCA). The literature on strategy deems the market-based view (MBV) and the resource –based view (RBV) as two approaches to giving businesses the competitive edge they need to compete in their industries. Aside from having competitive advantage as their ultimate goal, the two approaches are also similar in the sense that they both make use of particular tools and models in their undertakings. They also differ in numerous ways, starting with their definitions, assumptions about the equilibrium of the market and the tools and models used. Nevertheless, despite their differences which may portray them as rivals, in practice the two approaches are rather complementary as the crux of this essay shall illustrate. By definition the market-based view is an outside in approach to competitive strategy; which as stated by D. Faulkner (2007) copes with competition through ‘astute market positioning’. In other words firms identify the opportunities and threats in their external environment through the use of tools such as the Product Life Cycle, Porter’s 5 Forces Model of industry analysis, Strategic groups, Scenario planning and models namely Porter’s Generic Strategies, Customer Matrix and Mintzberg’s 5P’s Model. Upon......

Words: 1478 - Pages: 6

Vs Strategies

...secret utilizes a mixture of value added pricing and prestige pricing strategies. Victoria Secrets pricing strategy includes value added pricing by producing high quality clothing while offering additional features such as catalogues, brand recognition through its fashion shows, and aesthetically pleasing outlet stores to its customers [3]. Prestige pricing is also integrated into Victoria Secrets pricing strategy as the business is extremely recognizable as an exclusive and up-scale clothing distributor. Victoria secret uses prestige pricing to increase its sales price and put the perception of exclusive quality into the minds of its customers. This exclusive and high quality nature is enforced by the value adding features discussed above such as fashion shows. Lululemon: Lululemon utilizes a mixture of value added pricing and prestige pricing strategies. Lululemons pricing strategy includes value added pricing because the business attempts to create additional value for customers by adding additional features on their apparel rather than trying to cut costs by reducing features and the quality of materials used to produce their clothing. The existence of unique features such as clothing made of natural substances like seaweed adds value in the product perceptions of its customers and helps to justify Lululemons higher pricing [1]. Prestige pricing is an additional component of Lululemons pricing strategy. Lululemon produces high quality, unique, fashionable clothing that......

Words: 435 - Pages: 2

Competitive Strategies: Cisco vs. Aruba:

...Competitive Strategies: Cisco vs. Aruba: For the purpose of this assignment a comparison between two very successful companies leading commercial wireless enterprise networks, Cisco Systems and Aruba Networks will be the featured topic of research. This paper will discuss various points behind this comparison between these companies including Corporate Culture differences, Unique Culture Benefits, Affects if changes in Corporate Culture are Required. Corporate Culture Corporate culture is uniquely built and a myriad of factors go into creating an effective culture. There are at least six different components that have been found to be common within great corporate cultures. The vision, values, practices, people, narrative and place and how they are brought together will determine how successful or unsuccessful that corporation becomes. Developing these elements is essential to building an individual and long lasting organization. Because all corporations and businesses are unique it becomes increasingly difficult to duplicate each corporation exactly the same. Seven dimension of organizational cultures has been identifies that include: innovative, stable, people, outcome oriented, detail oriented, team oriented and aggressive (Chatman & Jehn, 1994). As the organization become more complex in their make-up, so do the various cultures they incorporate. In any organization looking to be successful, they need to be a hybrid of these cultures in order to keep......

Words: 2160 - Pages: 9

Fedex vs Ups: Competing with Contrasting Strategies in China

...structure look like? Which operations, processes and systems should be adopted? What financial advantages do they expect the merger to produce? What benefits can business units expect from Finance? And what Financerelated milestones are essential and practical for Day One of the new company? 3 Spotlight on the planning stage Successful companies set up the key design principles and strategy to be adopted by the Finance function before interim designs for Day One are considered. Typical design principles may include: the level of process and system customization, the degree of centralized governance, and the globalization of processes and procedures. In addition to generating answers to these questions, they establish the new entity’s Finance leadership team, which may include the CFO and his/her direct reports: the Corporate Controller, Treasurer, Business Unit and Regional Finance Leads, Corporate Financial Planning & Analysis, Head of Tax, and Head of Investor Relations, etc. They also develop a disciplined and farsighted plan for implementing their financial integration strategy. Through our extensive experience in this area, Accenture has defined ten critical success factors for Finance integration. We have grouped these factors into three stages: planning, resources and implementation. (See “Ten critical success factors for Finance function integration.”) This paper examines the planning stage, which centers on setting overall goals and priorities. Some of......

Words: 3161 - Pages: 13

Failure Analysis/Change Strategy: Blockbuster vs Netflix

...Failure Analysis/Change Strategy: Blockbuster vs Netflix LDR/531 Failure Analysis/Change Strategy: Blockbuster vs Netflix Organizational Behavior Theories The organizational behavior theories which explains Netflix’s success are two; decision-making and systems approaches. Netflix made the monumental decision to become a virtual dvd rental versus a brick and mortor provided a solution in the company’s goal and vision to be ahead of technological advances in the industry. Netflix took on the systems approach in understanding and measuring the company’s input and output processes. Netflix uses the systems approach to integrate and drive processes in developing adaptive capacities, driving innovation. Blockbusters organizational behavior theory focus was on scientific leadership. The company placed a great deal of focus on how to become more effective in the company’s brick and mortor business, redefining company objectives and direction. How employing this theory failed the company was the leadership decision to not pledge the same level or more focus on the click initiative which the company could not capture the needed momentum in becoming competitive with Netflix. Blockbuster could have had a more competitive edge over Netflix sustaining its presence in the industry if only the company could define better performance practices leveraging its click business over its brick and mortor presence. Role of the organization on the Fail/Success So how did an upstart......

Words: 1224 - Pages: 5

Nike vs Underarmour Innovation Strategy Analysis

...Table of Contents Introduction 3 Nike, Inc. 3 Under Armour 4 Porter’s five forces analysis 5 Nike, Inc. and Under Armour innovation strategies comparison 7 Conclusion 9 References 10 Introduction Nowadays, more and more people become concerned about health; they develop special diet that include vitamins and advanced nutrition supplements, and of course they do sports. Any kind of sports demand at least basic sports outfit: a T-shirt, shorts or pants, and a pair of shoes. Industry of sports apparel and footwear is an important part of today’s global business, where big companies have to compete for a customer. It is rather hard to differentiate on this market, because all the goods have to fulfill only one goal: make a person feel comfortable during a workout. Thus, companies have to work harder to develop new innovative products to gain market share advantage. The market of sports apparel is now dominated by several big companies: Nike, Inc., Adidas group (which includes Adidas and Reebok), and Puma. But there is also a new fast-growing and very promising player - Under Armour that managed to enter this saturated market. The key success factor for Under Armour was their innovative approach in creating sports apparel. Observing Under Armour’s success Nike has reconsidered their strategy and made innovation the core part of their mission, and in 2013 Nike was announced a #1 innovative company by So now there are two key innovators on the......

Words: 2728 - Pages: 11

Competitive Strategies Coca Cola vs. Pepsi

... Competitive Strategies Coca Cola vs. Pepsi By Mohammed Hashim Professor Dr. Phyllis Parise Contemporary Business May 05, 2013 Coca Cola and Pepsi Company are two of the largest producers and distributors of beverage in the world. They manufacture, markets and sells variety of carbonated, non-alcohol beverages. They continued to lead the industry with their commitment to healthier food and maintaining the high quality of their beverages. Pepsi and Coca Cola has been known to have history of competition to maintained share of world mark, where both companies need each other in order to remain competitive. Pepsi is known to offer culture that encourage their employee to be initiative, risk taking and free to pursue their goals. Senior management door are always open to question and ideas from junior employees. Diversity is a way of business to Pepsi, Pepsi President Walter Mack; in his diversification he hired Hennan Smith a black executive to lead an all-black sales team. While Coca Cola general culture is defined as leadership, passion, integrity, and diversity. To attain this Coca Cola Company create a worldwide tam that is full of diverse people, talent and ideas. If we discuss diversity Pepsi has proven to be ahead of Coca Cola, by recruiting people of color and give them early opportunity for advancement. Though Coca Cola has claim that, their workplace diversity program is design to attract, retain, and develop talent. This really did not provide a true count of......

Words: 860 - Pages: 4

Hp vs Ti Differs in Strategies

...Controls for Differentiated Strategies 597 Case 13-3 Texas Instruments and Hewlett-Packard Texas Instruments (TI) and Hewlett-Packard (HP) developed, manufactured, and sold high-technology electric and electronic products. Texas Instruments had three main lines of business in 1984: components, which includ ed semi conductor integrated circuits, semiconductor subassemblies, and electronic control devices; digital products, which included minicomputers, personal com puters, scientific instruments, and calculators; and government electronics, which included radar systems, missile guidance and control system s, and in frared surveillance systems. The three businesses generated 46 percent, 19 percent, and 24 percent, respectively, of TI’s sales in 1984. Hewle tt-Packard operated in two main lines of business: computer products, which included factory automation computers, engineering workstations, data termin als, per sonal computers, and calculators; and electronic test and measu rement sys tems, which included instruments that were used to evaluate the operation of electrical equipment against standards, instruments that would measu re and display electronic signals, voltmeters, and oscilloscopes. These busine sses gen erated 53 percent and 37 percent, respectively, of HP’s 1984 sales. Summary financial information for each company is presented in Exhibit 1. Although Texas Instruments and Hewlett-Packard competed in similar industries, the strategies chosen by these two firms......

Words: 1213 - Pages: 5

Strategy : Wal-Mart vs Honda

...Wal-Mart vs Honda 1. What are the sources of Wal-Mart’s competitive advantage in discount retailing? Discount stores extended to general merchandise by charging gross margins 10% ~ 15% lower than those of conventional department stores. To compensate, discount stores cut costs to the bone. In this way, Wal-Mart had two key aspects of initiating their business. First, they were locating stores in isolated rural areas and small towns. The other element was the pattern of expansion. They were always pushing from the inside out. As for operating business, Wal-Mart had their own way of doing things. First, they built their own warehouse so they could buy in volume at attractive prices and store the merchandise. Second, their useful information systems made flexibility among stores to operate their own strategy like “everyday-low-prices”, “satisfaction guaranteed” policies. Also, a two-step hub-and-spoke distribution network was used to reduce costs. It made Wal-Mart and their vendors benefited from reduced inventory costs and increased sales. In spite of some legal conflicts with competitors, they kept focusing on diversification and international operations with a strong relationship between the management and employees. 2. What is the strategy that allowed Honda to be so successful in the motorcycle industry? Beginning in the 1950s, Honda focused on superior productivity. First, they offered a multiproduct line. Second, they took leadership in product innovation and......

Words: 349 - Pages: 2

Competitive Strategy: Rbv vs Positioning School

...approach for strategists: rather than constantly trying to ‘fit’ and searching for right position within a turbulent, ever-changing business environment it is more sensible to found the strategy upon more stable sources of competitive advantage, such as internal resources and organizational capabilities (Grant, 1996). Careful assessment and efficient employment of these resources ensures firm’s sustainable growth and profitability. Prahalad and Hamel (1990) stress the importance of managers’ “ability to identify, cultivate and exploit the core competencies that make growth possible”. “The critical task for management is to create an organization capable of infusing products with irresistible functionality or, better yet, creating products that customers need but have not yet even imagined” (Prahaland and Hamel, 1990, p.80). These two authors obviously share Schumpeter’s view on importance of innovation and entrepreneurial approach, which they believe allows to shape external environment by inventing new markets and creating new products. This view represents another major difference with positioning school, where external environment is seen as something predetermined and not subject to change by a firm. ‘Strategy as fit’ which derives from positioning school is confronted by Prahalad and Hamel’s “strategy as stretch”, based on the premises that business environment rules can be changed and markets and industries can be, if only to a certain degree, shaped to firm’s......

Words: 458 - Pages: 2

Formal Strategic Planning vs. Emergent Strategy Introduction

...“Planning is bringing the future into the present so that you can do something about it now.” - Alan Lakein “Strategy is the long-term direction of an organisation” - Johnson, G., et al (2008) “Strategy is a pattern in a stream of decisions” - Mintzberg, H., (2007) Strategy is a term frequently used by businesses and these are just a few definitions for it. A more extensive one by Chandler (1963) is that strategy is ‘the determination of the long-run goals and objectives of an enterprise and the adoption of courses of action and the allocation of resources necessary for carrying out these goals.’ Strategic planning has been used in the general business community since the mid-twentieth century. In the 1960s and 1970s top firms such as General Electric applied strategic planning, promoting the qualities of providing a framework beyond the 12-month period and a systematic approach to managing business units (Webster, Reif and Bracker 1989). Today’s companies have to deal with dynamic and uncertain environments. For businesses to be successful, it is crucial to set out a game plan to continually strengthen the performance of their organisation. Traditional strategic planning has been an essential and repeatedly used management tool for decades; however, questions about its relevancy and effectiveness in that role have persisted. This essay critically examines the debate that formal strategic planning......

Words: 335 - Pages: 2

500GB Samsung 970 EVO M.2 (2280) SSD PCIe/NVMe MZ-V7E500BW | Zadnjih 7 dana | Manicure & Pedicure