Theresa Schiavo

In: English and Literature

Submitted By glenda0003
Words 1299
Pages 6
Justice for Theresa Schiavo

The case of Theresa (Terri) Marie Schiavo was a very well known in 2005. This case is the classic no win-win situation. Everyone will have a different point of view and perspective regarding this case. Terri was born on December 3, 1963 in Pennsylvania. In 1984 at age 20, she married her husband, Michael Schiavo, 21. Six years later something happened that changed her life forever. On February 25, 1990 Terri suffered from a cardiac arrest which caused her some brain damage leaving her in a Persistent Vegetative State (PVS). PVS can be defined as "a clinical condition of unawareness of self and environment, in which the patient, has a stable circulation, and shows cycles of eye closure and opening [that] may simulate sleep and waking". She was able to breathe on her own. However; she was given a percutaneous endoscopy gastronomy (PEG) to provide nutrition and hydration. Her husband becomes her guardian, which her parents, Mr,&Ms.Schindler, did not object. Terri was moved several times around from rehab to rehab and even different states for continuous testing. In 1992, two years after her accident Ms.Schiavo’s physician awards more than one million dollars. Her husband received $300,000 and about $750,000 was put in a trust fund specifically for Terri’s medical care. Just five months after Michael received the money Terri’s parents tried to become the guardian but courts decline. This is the part where it gets a little tricky and makes you wonder. Why did her parents never objected on her husband being the guardian before? Why did her parents decide to become her guardian, after there is money involved? It could have been a coincidence, but it makes you wonder.
Years went by and Michael did not lose hope on Terri; till many years later, eight years to be exact. After eight years Michael petitions the court to authorize…...

Similar Documents


...this matter. The Court said that even though Quinlan layed in a comatose state with minimal brain functions and her “personhood” was legally compromised she was still a person. I believe this aspect of their decision placed them on a slippery slope. Th final aspect that I will attempt to show how the Courts dealt with philosophically and constitutionally is the sanctity of life it self. The sanctity of life is a principle of implied protectionism. It is a belief that human life is sacred and should be treated as such. The Court has dealt with this issue in the Terrie Schiavo case. This case involved the court ordered removal of the feeding tube that was sustaining the life of Theresa Schiavo, who laid in vegetative state for 13 years. The Florida legislative passed a statute that gave the Governor the power to order the feeding tube replaced to sustain her vegetative state. The legal question is, does Schiavo have a constitutional right to die, and what is the sanctity of life. In Cruzan, the Court also addressed this issue. The court believed that prolonging life must refer to maintenance of a living beings biological existence. That this biological existence is apart from any question of the “value” of the existence. The Courts also wrestled with what gives life value. The court ultimately has made the distinction that biological life is valuable in itself. In the Cruzan case the Missouri Court is identifying the States interest in the preservation of life with the......

Words: 2368 - Pages: 10

Terri Schiavo

...Terri Schiavo was a 27-year old who suffered cardiac arrest on February 25,1990. Terri was anorexic which caused her to suffer from extreme hypokalemia, which is an imbalance of potassium. The hypokalemia caused the cardiac arrest, which led to a coma due to anoxia, a lack of oxygen in her brain. Terri had brain damage and was in a vegetative state “ during the subsequent months, she exhibited no evidence of higher cortical function. Computed tomographic scans of her brain eventually showed severe atrophy of her cerebral hemispheres, and her electroencephalograms were flat, indicating no functional activity of the cerebral cortex. Her neurologic examinations were indicative of a persistent vegetative state, which includes periods of wakefulness alternating with sleep, some reflexive responses to light and noise, and some basic gag and swallowing responses, but no signs of emotion, willful activity, or cognition” (Quill, M.D., 2005) At the hospital to buy time and keep her alive doctors had inserted a feeding tube. Two months later, her husband Michael transferred Terri from the hospital to a rehabilitation center. The following month her husband with no objections from her parents became her legal guardian. Her parents tried taking her home and caring for her but later sent her back to the rehab center because it was too much work to take care of her at home. Terri needed round the clock care “For months 13-18 into her coma, three shift of workers worked 24 hours a day...

Words: 1058 - Pages: 5


...Legal Ramifications of the Schiavo Case This article discusses the importance of Advance Directives and the development of the patient self-determination act of 1990 demonstrates the importance that the government places on a person’s right to make their own health care decisions. In the act, congress decided consumers had the right to make their own health care choices or appoint someone who can make that decision for them if they can no longer speak for themselves. It was deemed important enough that CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) mandated that all hospitals, home health and hospice agencies, skilled and long term facilities who receive their funds, are mandated to inform patients of their rights under state law to execute advance directives. The article discusses the legal mechanisms for consent or refusal of treatment including: living wills, durable power of attorney for health care and medical directives. The legal ramifications of the Terri Schiavo case was that there was no health care directive executed by her other than a conversation with her husband in which she stated she would not want to have her life prolonged if she was in a persistent vegetative state. Without a health care directive, after three years the decision to remove artificial nutrition and hydration was made by her husband (legal guardian). Terri’s parents and siblings disagreed and thus began a judicial, legal, ethical and media circus. The parents and siblings deemed the......

Words: 385 - Pages: 2

Terri Shiavo

...Health Law and Ethics | The Ethical Case of Terri Schiavo | [Type the document subtitle] | The end of life is to be expected. For many it is understood what an individual’s final wishes are. Living wills provide any issues in question with answers. What if an individual does not have a living will? Who would be in charge in making final decisions for someone who cannot physically make those decisions? The story of Terri Schiavo brings about many questions that represent moral, ethical, and legal issues. On February 25th 1990, Terri Schiavo suffers cardiac arrest, apparently caused by potassium imbalance and leading to brain damage due to lack of oxygen. The cerebral cortex had been completely destroyed and replaced by cerebrospinal fluid. Her upper brain was estimated to be about 80 percent destroyed. However her brainstem, which is responsible for breathing and heartbeat, was still functioning properly. This allowed Schiavo to survive with the assistance of a feeding tube. Terri Schiavo was diagnosed to be in a Persistent Vegetative State (P.V.S). The time frame that Terri Schiavo collapsed she was married to Michael Schiavo. Terri and Michael Schiavo married in 1984 which made Michael the spouse and through the appointment of the court, legal guardian of Terri Schivao. Husband Michael Schiavo believed that his wife would never want to be in a vegetative state. “Michael had been engaged in a court battle with Terri’s parents since 1998, seeking court sanction for...

Words: 787 - Pages: 4

Legal Case - Theresa Marie Schiavo: a Violation of Human Rights?

...1 Legal Case Paper The Case of Theresa Marie Schiavo: A Violation of Human Right? 2 The Case of Theresa Marie Schiavo: A Violation of Human Rights? Evolution of the Case In the early morning hours of February 25th, 1990, Theresa (Terri) Marie Schiavo suffered cardiac arrest at her home in St. Petersburg, Florida. Her husband awoke to the sound of her collapsing in the hallway and quickly called 911. Terri was found in full cardiac arrest and taken to Humana Northside Hospital. Unfortunately, the then twenty-six year old Terri had suffered irreversible damage due to prolonged lack of oxygen to the brain. Terri is left in a persistent vegetative state and has a feeding tube and requires total care (Schindler v Schiavo, 2005). The next three years consist of her husband, Michael, and her parents Robert and Mary Schindler working together to take care of Terri. During this time Michael was appointed as Terri’s legal guardian without objection from her parents. In February of 1993 Michael Schiavo and the Schindler’s began to disagree about Terri’s care and the Schindler’s attempted to remove Michael as her legal guardian (Cerminara & Goodman, 2005). In May of 1998, Michael Schiavo made his first attempt to petition the court for the removal of Terri’s feeding tube. Michael believed that there was no hope for any sort of recovery or changes in Terri’s persistent vegetative state and had stated that his wife told him that she would not want to live like that...

Words: 1810 - Pages: 8


...the right to be helped with their health and well-being, so people should have the right to die. Euthanasia will help the patient and the hospital financially. Euthanasia will be an easier ending, therefore helping the patient, family and loved ones emotionally. Euthanasia is the most humane solution. Euthanasia should be legalized. Euthanasia References Theresa Tamkins. (2009, June 05). Medical bills prompt more than 60 percent of U.S. bankruptcies. Retrieved December 08, 2012, from Erika Gonzalez. (2012, May 21). Patients go bankrupt as medical costs soar. Retrieved December 11, 2012, from Jeremy W. Wilson. (2011, unknown). Debating voluntary human adult euthanasia. Retrieved December 12, 2012, from Unknown. (2012, unknown). Euthanasia Pros and Cons. Retrieved December 07, 2012, from Schiavo T. (2010, May 05). Facts about Euthanasia. Retrieved December 07, 2012, from Unknown. (2012, March 09). Euthanasia. Retrieved December 07, 2012, from Unknown. (2012, December 10). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved December 28, 2012,......

Words: 1557 - Pages: 7

Terri Schiavo

...They selected the removal of fluids and nutrients for Terri Schiavo in order to end her life. She had been brain dead for a while. They thought that this would be the easiest way to end her life. In her case, while there was some disagreement as to her exact medical condition, she was not in fact dying at the time. She was disabled and brain dead. I feel like the removal of her fluids and nutrients wasn’t the easiest way to do it. I feel like she suffered a lot. I think that if she was going to end life, then she should have been given a quicker euthanasia. Her husband was the power of attorney by marriage and he wanted the feeding tube pulled out. I do feel like I may have violated Terri’s rights. When watching the videos I couldn’t help but think about what she would have wanted. If she had the ability to speak, I wonder what she would’ve told her family and boyfriend. I feel like it was wrong to rule in the favor of dehydration and starvation of Kerri. She should’ve been able to go home with her family and tried to get better. She was “as alive as any person watching this program”, said the narrator. I do think we have an ethical obligation to supply hydration and nutrition. Do matter what state she was in, she was still a person. Even when her mother was in the room, she acknowledged her in some way. This shows that she was somewhat responsive. I feel like it is her right to live. She was conscious of the situation and was able to at least recognize what was going on.......

Words: 355 - Pages: 2

The Schiavo Perspective on End-of-Life Care

...The Schiavo Perspective on End-Of-Life Care The Schiavo case showed that most Americans believe that end-of-life issues should not be decided by politicians. ABSTRACT: Americans have reached consensus that (1) people have a right to refuse lifesustaining medical interventions, and (2) interventions that can be terminated include artificial nutrition and hydration. The one unresolved issue is how to decide for mentally incompetent patients. Only about 20 percent of Americans have completed living wills, and data show that family members are poor at predicting patients’ wishes for life-sustaining care. But despite court cases and national consensus that these are private and not legislative matters, the Schiavo case is unlikely to change practices except to increase the number of Americans who complete living wills. Remember 197 6? That was the year the United States was engaged in the case of Karen Ann Quinlan, the first so-called right-to-die case.1 When Quinlan was twenty-one years old, she ceased breathing for two fifteen-minute periods while at a party. In the emergency room her pupils were nonreactive, and she was unresponsive to deep pain stimuli. She was placed on a respirator, and a year later she was respiratordependent, in a persistent vegetative state, and receiving nutrition through a feeding tube. After consulting his priest, Quinlan’s father requested that the respirator be discontinued, but her physician refused, and a series of court cases......

Words: 1941 - Pages: 8

Baby Theresa

...Baby Theresa The case of Baby Theresa became a worldwide controversy that made several minds scramble on making the right decision. Baby Theresa was an anencephalic infant with no chance of survival. Her parents volunteered her organs for transplant to save other children, yet by the time she died, her organs were too deteriorated to be transplanted. Several question arose when this scenario came into questions for the Florida Law officials. South Florida ruled that Theresa's vital organs could not be transplanted until all brain activity - including any function of her brain stem, which controls respiratory and heartbeat - had ceased. Vital questions/concerns were raised on if the right decision was made and if the law was upheld. In one way I believe doctors should have allowed the transplant of Baby Theresa's organs because they could have benefited other children and this would not have harmed Baby Theresa, who had no conscious life anyway. On the other hand, it is always wrong to use one person as a means to somebody's else's ends, that it would have been wrong to violate Baby Theresa's autonomy. But Baby Theresa had no capability of autonomy and her parents were her decision maker. Yet the law makes rules in order to abide certain circumstances like these. Therefore if the law were to bend the rule for this situation then the law would not be upholding their status and would have to give everyone an exemption. Several statements can be made and inferred with......

Words: 1003 - Pages: 5

Mother Theresa

...As you reflect on life thus far, what has someone said, written, or expressed in some fashion that is especially meaningful to you. Why? According to Mother Teresa, “If you judge someone, you have no time to love them.” I first saw this quote when it was posted on my sixth-grade classroom wall, and I hated it. Rather, I hated Mother Teresa’s intention, but I knew that the quote’s veracity was inarguable. I felt that it was better to judge people so as not to have to love them, because some people don’t deserve a chance. Judgments are shields, and mine was impenetrable. Laura was my dad’s first girlfriend after my parents’ divorce. The first three years of our relationship were characterized solely by my hatred toward her, manifested in my hurting her, each moment hurting myself twice as much. From the moment I laid eyes on her, she was the object of my unabated hatred, not because of anything she had ever done, but because of everything she represented. I judged her to be a heartless, soulless, two-dimensional figure: she was a representation of my loneliness and pain. I left whenever she entered a room, I slammed car doors in her face. Over those three years, I took pride in the fact that I had not spoken a word to her or made eye contact with her. I treated Laura with such resentment and anger because my hate was my protection, my shield. I, accustomed to viewing her as the embodiment of my pain, was afraid to let go of the anger and hate, afraid to love the person who......

Words: 520 - Pages: 3

Analysis of Schiavo vs. Marina District - Three Levels of Umbalance

...Judge Johnson noted that New Jersey's anti-discrimination law permits an employer to require its workers to adhere to reasonable workplace grooming, appearance and dress standards, as long as they do not violate other provisions of the law or other laws. And he concluded that despite the plaintiffs' claims that they were made to act as stereotypical sex objects to market the casino, the casino's requirements were reasonable. The law only recognizes sex-stereotyping when employers use stereotypes to impose a professional disadvantage on one sex or punishes a trait in one sex that it praises in the other, but neither situation occurred at the Borgata, the judge ruled. And as for the casino's policy forbidding the “Borgata Babes” from gaining more than 7 percent of the weight at which they were hired, the judge found that the policy itself, which contained exceptions for medical issues and pregnancy, was not unlawful and that the plaintiffs had not backed up their claim that it was only enforced against female employees with anything more than unverified anecdotes. Frank v. United Airlines The Superior Court of New Jersey said the terms and conditions of the CBSs’ employment are lawful for several reasons. First, the court said the offer letter and terms of the PAS fully disclosed Borgata’s expectations of the CBSs, and the CBSs voluntarily accepted those terms and conditions. Second, the court concluded that the appearance and grooming standards are not unlawful......

Words: 671 - Pages: 3

Terri Schiavo

...Running head: FIGHTING FOR DEAR LIFE: AN ETHICAL CASE STUDY ON Fighting for Dear Life: An Ethical Case Study on Terri Schiavo Catherine Grace Bautista Adventist University of Health Sciences Ethical and Legal Issues in Healthcare HTCA543 Dr. Stanley Dobias February 24, 2015 1 FIGHTING FOR DEAR LIFE: AN ETHICAL CASE STUDY ON 2 Introduction Death is inevitable. However, for some of us, we fail to express our final wishes to our loved ones and this more often than not ends in conflict. In the United States, it is necessary for an individual to have a living will since this provides answers to end of life issues that would be in question. The story of Terri Schiavo was a case study worthy of note given that concerns or conflicts about end of life care have never been a source of familial dispute in my native country, the Philippines. Her 15-year saga brought about several questions that correspond to moral, ethical, and legal issues. Terri Schiavo’s end of life issue has now set a treacherous precedent for all vulnerable Americans, especially those who are in the marginalized sector: the disabled, those who have terminal illnesses, those who can no longer speak for themselves, and perhaps one day even to those who are indigent and unable to pay for costly health care. These individuals may become gradually compelled to make the choice to die and “get out of the way” notwithstanding their true wishes. Early Years Therese Marie Schindler was......

Words: 2343 - Pages: 10

Terri Schiavo

...Terri Schiavo was considered to be in a vegetative state which is a condition that is separate from being classified as “brain dead.” She was able to breathe without assistance but was thought to have no mental state. There was an increasingly petulant battle between her husband and her parents. Mr. Schiavo wanted to remove her feeding tubes and insisted that his wife would not want to be kept alive in her state. The parents wanted to keep her on the feeding tube because they believed it to be their daughter’s wishes. The Florida courts were sympathetic to both parties but sided with Mr. Schiavo lawfully. Florida legislators felt the decision was unconstitutional and created what they called “Terri’s law” to prevent Mr. Schiavo from removing her tubes. The law was later overturn by the Florida Supreme Court. Then, the president at the time, George W. Bush, got involved and made the issue a federal case, which in turn favored with Mr. Schiavo in the removal of the feeding tubes. Ms. Schiavo died soon after. This is an unfortunately sad case that involved multiple stakeholders. Both the husband and parents loved Ms. Schiavo. I can understand all parties in this case but I overtly sympathize with the parents and husband because it is difficult to let someone go that you love but it is also difficult to see them suffering. I also understand that in some cases there is need for the courts to intervene. Considering all factors, I firmly believe that decisions involving the life...

Words: 277 - Pages: 2

Schiavo Case/Advance Directives

...Schiavo Case/Advance Directives The life and death tug-of-war over a person’s life, not only is it heartbreaking but a difficult choice to make for family and loved ones. As human beings we try to hold on to any little bit of life a loved one might have just to be with them a little be longer. Unfortunately, we do not know what they are feeling inside or what the loved one is going thru emotionally; are they in immense pain or how much discomfort are they experiencing? How about their dignity of life? As humans we hold on to the “Faith” that there could be a slight chance of a “Miracle” happening. That miracle being a medical triumph or even the loved one making a recovery miracle by their unwillingness to give up, the will power to fight and overcome all obstacles. As I was reading the Terri Schiavo case, I could see how a family could be torn apart. Everyone had an opinion on her life and what should be done, her family wanted to keep her alive as long as possible and her husband he wanted to follow thru with her wishes as she had mentioned on a few occasions “that she did not want to live her life as a vegetable.” After so many years of the family fighting for Terri to stay alive and her husband fighting to end her life as she wished, Terri was fighting her own fight, with no one to listen to her. As a mother’s love I could see how Terri’s mother did not want to let her daughter go, it’s heartbreaking, no mother wants to see their children go before their time is up.......

Words: 583 - Pages: 3

Tube Feeding: Prolonging Life or Death in Vulnerable Populations?

...(sometimes called Healthcare Proxy); often these cases arrive in the courts. Within the US, the recent case of Theresa Schiavo, age 40, brings this controversy again into the spotlight (Oranksky, 2003). The result of a myocardial infarction at age 26, following a potassium deficiency, Schiavo was in a PVS for years. In 1998, her husband brought legal measures to remove her feeding tube, and in November 1998 he was granted that right. However, this move was opposed by her parents. The parents have since sued and brought the case to the attention of the courts and the Florida legislature, which passed a law signed by Governor Jeb Bush outlawing the removal of Schiavo’s tube (Charatan, 2003). This law, House Bill No. 35-E, was passed on October 21, 2003, and states: The Governor shall have the authority to issue a one-time stay to prevent the withholding of nutrition and hydration from a patient if, as of October 15, 2003: a) that patient has no written advanced directive; b) the court has found that patient to be in a PVS; c) that patient has had nutrition and hydration withheld; and d) a member of that patient’s family has challenged the withholding of nutrition and hydration. (Full text available at: Since the passage of this law, a guardian has been appointed by the court and Theresa Schiavo remains in a PVS in a Florida hospice. However, on September 23, 2004, the Florida Supreme Court unanimously......

Words: 8277 - Pages: 34

Watch in HD | 23 abr 2018 | [Substratum] Belo v11.4 modded apk