Whistle Blowers

In: Business and Management

Submitted By Mohiman
Words 3621
Pages 15
SUBMITTED TO
Omar Faruk Assistant Professor Department of Business Administration East West University

SUBMITTED BY
Students of the
Department of Business Administration

ID No.
Md. Mohiman 2009-1-10-147
Jaheda Sultana 2009-1-10-029
Md. Anamul Haque 2009-2-10-108
Md.Mehedi Hasan 2009-1-10-073

Organizational behavior
Course Code: MGT251
Section: 3

East West University 1. Do you believe that whistle-blowing is good for organizations and its members, or is it, as David Stetler believes, often a means to extort financial gains from companies?

Whistle blowing means calling attention to wrongdoing that is occurring within an organization.
The fact whistle blowers are good/bad for an organization depends on different situations whether a whistle-blowing will have a positive or negative result over the organization. That is it depends on what they're whistling about.

If it has intention to get someone trouble then we have to think about the undesirable consequences it might happen for whistle blowing. On the other sense, if it is someone who is angry with the organization for other reasons and blows the whistle solely to cause harm or embarrassment to the company, then they're just a jerk.

On the other hand, of it is related to protest against unethical deeds then it is ok. If whistle blowing is a means toward a positive end, then in the long run, we might want to consider it good for the organization as a whole, but not so for some of those within the organization who refuse to adhere to ethical behavior.

However, I tend to believe that most whistle blowers are simply conscientious people who see injustice and want it to be corrected. For example, if your company has a procedure that is not being followed, but it really isn't hurting anything, blowing the whistle only causes problems. However, if you…...

Similar Documents

Whistle Blower Essay - Drug Dogs

...Hunter Viles™ Mrs. Lesky Eng III 6th hour 19 September 2012 Whistle Blower Drugs are around. No matter where you go. It’s a fact of life. Many people try not to believe it, but it’s true. Cops do their job to make sure these “drugies” and “druge dealers” get caught and justice is served, right? Well, for the most part, they do. However, there is a right way and there is a crooked way to do things. Cops in Charlevoix have been proved to misuse drug dogs. Who knows who else have been using drug dogs to their advantage. They’re animals that can easily be trained and controlled by humans. Drug dogs should not be used because they aren’t always accurate, they cost too much, and some cops don’t use them in the correct way. “Send the K9 unit!” Sounds pretty promising if a cop yells that, but not as much as you may think. Drug dogs have been known to be easily thrown off. Bacon, beef, and common dog treats have been known to throw off the scent of a professionally trained drug dog. If a drug dealer knows this simple trick, an easy getaway could be in his future. Something that is so easily thrown off should not be dependable. A nose of a dog shouldn’t be the last resort to try to find something or someone. For one of the best drug dogs you can possible get, the lowest price is $5,000, not including shipping. Most K9 units come from Germany which can ride shipping costs up to $3,000 a dog. This reason goes hand and hand with the first reason previously stated. If we pay up......

Words: 477 - Pages: 2

Whistle Blower Rewarded by Fbi

...hundreds of millions of dollars (FBI, 2010). This agreement, made in December 2004, remains the largest fraud settlement in Missouri history and, at the time, was the sixth largest in the country (FBI, 2010). This lawsuit remains the largest settlement in Missouri history (Savat, 2011). Under the federal whistle-blower law, Dr. Bander received a $56 million share of the settlement (FBI, 2010). With his settlement amount, Bander started up a new foundation for Medical Ethics. He wanted his students and any person in the medical field to be informing of what is right and what is wrong. This is what ethics teaches us. His foundation became known as the Bander business Ethics in Medical Research (FBI, 2010). He also opened up another foundation called “Bander Business Ethics in Medical Research Funding Program. (Vitale, Missouri Lawyers Media, 2011).” The mission of the Bander Center for Medical Business Ethics is to promote ethical business practices in medical care and research through the development of training and investigation opportunities for medical students, residents and physicians in practice (FBI, 2010). Dr. Bander was classified as a whistle-blower. Whistle-blowers are protected very well. These people are those inside the company that report unethical behavior (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2011, p. 110). Bander did report the wrong doing of his company, and by doing so, he protected consumers from further fraud. Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and......

Words: 1309 - Pages: 6

Whistle Blowing

...What is a whistle blower? What is a whistle blower? To the untrained eye, you may think that a whistle blower is a person who controls a sport or game with a loud device called whistle. In reality, a whistle blower has become an important part of the American business landscape. So what is a whistle blower? According to Blacks Law Dictionary, a whistleblower is an employee who turns against their superiors to bring a[n] problem out in the open. BusinessDictionary.com states that a whistle blower is a person who discloses improper or criminal activity within an organization. Finally, under Sarbanes Oxley, “A “whistleblower” is someone, usually an employee, who reports an employer who has broken the law to an outside agency.” Under this very important act, whistleblowers are protected by federal and state laws. Employers may not retaliate against them for reporting misconduct. Whistleblowers may not be fired or otherwise mistreated, and in some instances the government may reimburse them for costs incurred as a result of reporting. Most importantly, the federally enacted statute of Dodd – Frank defines a whistle blower as, “Any individual who provides . . . information relating to a violation of the securities laws to the Commission in a manner established, by rule or regulation, by the Commission.” There are two types of whistle blowers: external and internal. An internal whistle blower is a person who reports misconduct on a fellow employee or superior within their......

Words: 2053 - Pages: 9

Whistle Blowing

...Is There a Right to Blow the Whistle? Whistle-blowing is the unforced release of confidential information, as a moral protest, by a member or an ex-member of an organization to an suitable audience outside the usual channels of communication regarding illegal and/or immoral behavior in the organization that is acting against public interest. There are some laws in existence that protects whistle-blowers. The first of these is the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, which allows federal employees to report waste and corruption in the government without fear of retaliation. In order to receive and take action on complaints of retaliation, the act set up the Merit System Protection Board. The Whistle-Blower Protection Act of 1989 reinforces this protection with the formation of the Office of Special Counsel for going through whistle-blower reports. In both private and public sectors, federal legislation protects whistle-blowers, and some states even give rewards for whistle-blowing. Regarding whistle-blower protection, there are arguments in favor of it as well as arguments against it. The main argument in its favor is that the society can benefit from the revealing of illegal activities, waste, and mismanagement; this can only occur if whistle-blowers can come forward without having to worry about any retaliatory actions. Another argument is that those who work for the government have a First Amendment right to freedom of speech and so should be protected from retaliation.......

Words: 753 - Pages: 4

Whistle Blower

...Being a Whistle Blower To some the word whistleblower just sounds like a bad thing to be called. So what is a whistle blower you may ask? A whistleblower is a person who informs on a person or an organization engaged in an illicit activity. So what are the pro to being a whistleblower, better yet what are the cons as well? Some of the pros are that the person who is a whistleblower is a courageous individual who recognize a wrong and are willing to take risks in order to see that the wrongs are corrected. “Personal gratification isn’t the only benefit of becoming a whistleblower though. The amount that the relator can receive most often ranges from 15% to 30% depending on whether the government intervenes in the case or not. The whistle blower will also receive 10 to 30 percent of the monies the SEC and other government authorities collect based on the whistleblower’s information if more than $1 million is collected.” (Pros and Cons of Becoming a Whistleblower) This is what most people that are whistleblowers go for. Most people don’t care about what is the right thing to do in a case but instead what the pay out may be at the end of the tunnel. The people like this are the people that don’t deserve to have a job and need to just become hermits because no one wants any one like that working for them or around them. Lets talk cons now. “Filing a qui tam or whistleblower suit is not for the light-hearted. In addition to the stress and anxiety associated with reporting a......

Words: 784 - Pages: 4

Whistle Blower

...Is it worth blowing the whistle? Ethics, values and beliefs all play a role in accounting. But when it comes being a whistleblower you can see where these things can start to conflict with one another. Even though there are laws to protect a whistle blower very few people do and those who do blow the whistle aren’t always happy after it’s done. At the same time those who do report do receive benefits and can say they truly have honesty and integrity. Ethics is more than just what’s right and wrong. What is right to one person can be considered wrong to another. Ethics are based off of what we know to be morally right or wrong. Smoking marijuana is wrong in the United States but considered ordinary or right in Amsterdam. Some ethical decisions go further than knowing what is the right thing to do, sometimes our emotions can get the best of us and leave us making poor decisions. When deciding the ethical thing to do in a situation you must set your emotions aside and base your decision on what you know or consider being right. Ethics is a large part of accounting. You are constantly faced with decisions where you need to decide the ethical thing to do. Whistleblowing involves the act of reporting wrongdoing within an organization to internal or external parties (Eaton & Akers, 2007).As a whistleblower your ethical decisions are what decide if you should blow the whistle. You know that adjusting numbers such as Enron did is wrong and unethical. Many people are......

Words: 1929 - Pages: 8

Whistle Blower

...Introduction Whistle blowing is a term used to describe a person who reports a wrongdoing to a superior or an authority figure in order to stop the offense. At first thought whistle blowing may seem like an easy decision, but it can easily materialize into a difficult ethical dilemma. In a healthcare environment nurses are expected to put the welfare of there patients first, but what if the consequence of blowing the whistle is committing career suicide? Nurses need to know about this ethical dilemma so when a situation, such as the aforementioned, arises they will know what to do and hopefully make the right decision. This topic really appealed to me because I believe that it is an issue that all nurses will be faced with one day. Additionally it goes against everything I was taught growing up, I was raised to never “taddle tell” or as I got older to never “snitch”. As I now pursue a career in nursing theses rules no longer apply, and the safety and welfare of my patients must come first. Review of Literature One study conducted by Professor Firth-Cozens (2003) asked over 1,700 nurses and doctors “would you blow the whistle on a colleague?” Professor Firth-Collins and his team also explored the factors that go along with whistle blowing; these factors included the fear of retribution, the uncertainty of judging another’s competence and the desire to support other colleagues (“Would you”, 2003). The results were interesting as differences between doctors and nurses......

Words: 1090 - Pages: 5

Whistle Blowing

...Dana Brown Whistle blowing Article Link: http://www.computingcases.org/case_materials/hughes/case_history/hughes_case_history.html Whistle-blowing is the disclosure by current or former employees of illegal, immoral or illegitimate organizational practices to people or organizations that may be able to change the practice. The whistle- blower lacks the power to change the undesirable practice directly and so appeals to others either inside or outside the organization. A good example of whistle-blowing is shown in the “The Hughes Whistle blowing Case. “ In the mid 1980s, Hughes Microelectronics was manufacturing what were called hybrid microchips for use in guidance systems and other military programs. This case is about what happened when employees of Hughes Microelectronics noticed that these tests were being skipped. The decisions they made to report this makes this one of the classic cases in the history of whistle-blowing. Margaret Goodearl and Ruth Ibarra are the two whistle-blowers in this case. Goodearl was in charge (along with Donald LaRue) of the floor area in which the testing was done. Ibarra was a quality control agent hired by the company to provide an additional audit of the accuracy and completeness of the tests. Margaret Goodearl and Ruth Ibarra witnessed at least five attempts to bypass the appropriate tests. In each incident when Goodearl would address the issue to upper management she was threatened with loss of her job. After Goodearl began to......

Words: 668 - Pages: 3

Whistle Blower Policy

...DLF | Whistle Blower Policy | | | [Type the author name] | | | Corporate Governance: Whistle Blower Policy | | 1. Introduction This policy seeks to define and establish the position of DLF Limited and its subsidiaries ('hereinafter referred to as the 'Company') on the framework for reporting instances of unethical/improper conduct and actioning suitable steps to investigate and correct the same. Accordingly, this policy details the following: * Procedure to disclose any suspected unethical and/or improper practice taking place in the Company; * Protection available to the person making such disclosure in good faith; * Mechanism for actioning and reporting on such disclosures to the relevant authority within the Company; and * Relevant authority and its powers to review disclosures and direct corrective action relating to such disclosures. 2. Objective The Company seeks to maintain the highest ethical and business standards in the course of conduct of its business. In doing so, the Company has articulated and published its Code of Conduct, which is applicable to all employees of the Company, to regulate and build a strong culture of corporate governance, by promoting transparency and ethical conduct in its business operations, along with providing the framework within which the Company expects its business operations to be carried out. The Whistleblower policy is an extension of the Company's Code of Conduct through which......

Words: 2107 - Pages: 9

Whistle Blower

...Jairo Magdaleno 3/10/2014 ENG-101-B New Aged Paul Reveres The term whistle blower defines a person who exposes misconduct, alleged dishonesty or illegal activity within an organization. In plain English, this means, someone exposing an organization of wrong doing. However, should a person who exposes wrong doing be punished? Or should they be praised and thanked? Two most recent, possibly the biggest, whistle blowing events include two individuals with high rank within the US government. The question was, should these individuals be punished for their actions? Being portrayed and explained by the mainstream media most people would say "Yes, lock him up!". With a little research, however, one might not find it necessary to punish these individuals so severely. One might even find this move, patriotic. Bradley Manning is an individual convicted of Espionage and sentenced to thirty-five years in federal prison for the largest disclosure of secret government documents. Manning was a Computer Intelligence Analyst with the United States Army. From the seat of his computer work station in Iraq, Manning had access to SIPRNET(The Secret Internet Protocol Router Network). This is the private computer network that the government uses to transmit government files around the world. With a few key strokes, Manning had access to countless "secret" government files. When these files became too much to bare, Manning felt that the public needed to know the truth in......

Words: 491 - Pages: 2

Whistle Blowing

...WHISTLE BLOWING Defination Whistle blowing is an attempt by an employee or former employer of an organization to disclose what she or he believes to be wrong doing sin or by the organization (James 1995) In Whistleblowing, raising concerns and speaking up are all phrases which describe disclosing information to an employer or where appropriate a regulator, police or the media about malpractice, wrongdoing or a risk to safety. Whistleblowing is providing a solution to resolve such situations: it opens nonexistent or hidden information sources and channels. The reasons for revealing information can be manifold: e.g. when someone notices such an abuse at his/her place of work and would like to discuss it with the relevant person within the organization. We may call it whistleblowing as well when an employee is forced to try to put an end to some kind of unlawful or malignant activities with the help of extra-organizational channels as within the organization either the proper investigation of the case is not guaranteed or the employee might be subject to reprisals. In many cases someone considers it a cause enough to publicize confidential information when the information in question concerns the public at large. In such cases the whistleblower maintains that informing the public is of much stronger interest (namely of public interest) then reserving the confidentiality, exclusivity of the information. A Whistleblower is an informant who exposes wrongdoing within an......

Words: 1688 - Pages: 7

Whistle Blowers

...evaluates the investments by analyzing cash flows. Internal Rate of Return uses percentage that is similar to the rate of interest in comparing potential investments with other possible or existing kind of investments. The method involves dividing the expected profits from the potential investment by the expected expenditure in order to arrive at the rate of return. Evaluating capital investments is an essential task for Johnson Controls Inc. in order to understand the viability of its capital budget before venturing into the emerging markets. Evaluating investments helps the company determine if the investments in question are worthwhile. Johnson Controls Inc. may have many investment opportunities in the emerging market but it must measures the potential of each opportunity preferably in isolation and make comparison of each in order to select the a few or just one that maximizes the value of the firm and reduce the potential risk. For example, Johnson Controls Inc. might be trying to determine if venturing into the emerging market will require buying new equipment or using the existing ones. The company might also be interested in determining if there is need to invest in research and development before venturing into the emerging market with a new or existing product. The company can therefore supplement its traditional methods of evaluating investments (such as payback period) with Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) as well as Multiple......

Words: 1616 - Pages: 7

Whistle Blowing

...Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley LEG 500 LEG 500 Whistle blowing has its origins from an example of law enforcement blowing a whistle when someone finds a crime or some wrongdoing process in a government. So when wrongs are taking place in government, the public they serve suffers (Chambers, 2014). The government is supposed to be open. Whistleblowers have to care about the issues that are going on in the workplace for them to commit such energy into the act. They have ethics and morals. The whistle blower is passionate about their work and its proper execution (Chambers, 2014; Lowry, Moody, Galletta, & Vance, 2013). The recent case of September 2014, Katherine Mitchell, Paula Pedene, and Damien Reese brought to light the wrongdoing at Phoenix Veteran Affairs hospital where records on appointment data were falsified to hide delays in treatment. There was financial mismanagement in the agency which was later confirmed by the inspector general after the three exposed the issue (Hicks, 2014; Lee & Fargher, 2013). Paula was punished by the management because she spoke against financial mismanagement in the hospital. She was given a desk and a job in the basement. Katherine's supervisors tried to sabotage her career by giving her a position of overseeing quality of patient care. Given that the three were protected under the Sarbanes Oxley act, they were later promoted by the agency. In this way whistle blowing is encouraged not punished. The three were......

Words: 874 - Pages: 4

Whistle Blowers: Saints or Sinners

...Unit Three: Case Incident 2: Whistle Blowers: Saints or Sinners Rachel Hogan Kaplan University MT302 Organizational Behavior May 17th, 2011 Corporate whistle-blowing, reporting company wrong-doings is a controversial subject of debate. There have been several widely known cases in which reputations are damaged, sometimes unsubstantiated or falsely, and where informants have received hefty pay-offs. The adoption of the whistle blower law pays informants thirty percent of legal fines received from lawsuits in whistle blowing cases (Judge & Robbins). I believe corporate whistle-blowing is good for organizations, its members, and the general public. It is important for corporate wrong-doings and do-ers to be brought to the attention of senior management. The sooner the wrong-doings are reported and investigated, the better for everyone involved. Before the issue is handled publicly or in court, the organization should have the opportunity to rectify the wrong-doings, which would save money in legal proceedings, and save the reputation of the company. According to our Organizational Behavior textbook, self-fulfilling prophecy has “evolved to characterize the fact that an individual’s behavior is determined by other people’s expectation” (Robbins & Judge, 2007). With this in mind, I believe self-fulfilling prophecy can drive an individual’s search for incriminating evidence or sometimes hinder it. An employee may have a negative......

Words: 847 - Pages: 4

Whistle Blowers : Saints or Sinners Whistle Blowing

...Case Study 1 I believe both whistle blowers and David Stetler thoughts are possible with today’s society and the different opinions of how people interpret situations. If a co-worker has studied the Attribution Theory in which determines whether a persons intentions are internally or externally caused. Self prophecy whistle blower who honestly believes in justice being served would be eager to collect evidence and make sure all evidence is full proof. By frivolous lawsuits occurring whistle blowers who has valid claims would have to make sure: Their story is legit with NO wholes in it for companies to redeem themselves by being able to accuse “one” of lying upon the company. I feel as long as the story is solid and all evidence is there why would “one” not come forth with the information against the company. Whistle blowers claims will be carefully and thoroughly evaluated to make sure everything being presented are facts toward the company To prevent frivolous lawsuits companies and governments should have their own private investigator to do research with personal documentation instead of relying upon the whistle blowers information along. Companies and governments then would be able to catch when or even before fraudulent activities begin. Employees should do what they feel is right for their situation at hand. The disadvantage...

Words: 340 - Pages: 2

Sacchi a pelo | Effect of Electronic Communication on Interpersonal Communication | Exquisite Chinese handmade jade bowls